Is Action Design Research Indeed Necessary? Analysis and Synergies Between Action Research and Design Science Research

Action research is one of the research methods that seeks to develop scientific knowledge while simultaneously acting to solve real problems. Design science and design science research are approaches that address problem-solving oriented researches, converging in this aspect with the objectives of action research. A significant part of the literature discusses action research and design science research separately. However, there are some early discussions regarding the similarities and the differences between these research methods. The objective of this study is to deepen an analysis that distinguishes action research, design science and design science research as research methods considering their convergences and divergences. This leads to the discussion of the need for a third method: action design research. This study was conducted based on a configurative systematic literature review. The analysis and the synthesis of literature took into account themes and content analyses. Some results could be observed. First, there is a significant number of similarities among these research methods; second, there are complementary and positive synergies in their use; and third, the concepts of artifact and classes of problems seem to contribute both to the proposition and to the evaluation of the results obtained by action research. Finally, it was possible to establish a set of possibilities for the use of action research and design science research in a combined manner. The limitations of this study have a theoretical nature. There is a need for a comparative analysis of the use of action research and design science research and the use of action research under the paradigm of design science.

[1]  Nigan Bayazit,et al.  Investigating Design: A Review of Forty Years of Design Research , 2004, Design Issues.

[2]  D. Coghlan,et al.  Action research for operations management , 2002 .

[3]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Operations Management as a Problem-Solving Discipline , 2006 .

[4]  Adriano Proença,et al.  Design Science Research: método de pesquisa para a engenharia de produção , 2013 .

[5]  J. Aken.  Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[6]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[7]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Bridging Practice and Theory: A Design Science Approach , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[8]  Catherine T. Amelink,et al.  Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education , 2009 .

[9]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Collaborative design research: Lessons from continuous auditing , 2013, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Mark Bilandzic,et al.  Towards Participatory Action Design Research: Adapting Action Research and Design Science Research Methods for Urban Informatics , 2011, J. Community Informatics.

[11]  Paul Veerkamp,et al.  Modeling Design Process , 1990, AI Mag..

[12]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[13]  Mortimer J. Adler,et al.  How to Read a Book , 1940 .

[14]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research , 2008 .

[15]  Philip Powell,et al.  Furthering Distributed Participative Design , 2009, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research , 2005, ICIS.

[17]  David Coghlan,et al.  Roles, Politics, and Ethics in Action Research Design , 2005 .

[18]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Bridging Worlds: Information Systems Development Through Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2012, Systemic Practice and Action Research.

[19]  Jacqueline Fendt,et al.  Relevance and creativity through design-driven action research: Introducing pragmatic adequacy , 2011 .

[20]  Erik Stubkjær,et al.  Design research for cadastral systems , 2011, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[21]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Action research and design science research - Seemingly similar but decisively dissimilar , 2009, ECIS.

[22]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[23]  John R. Venable,et al.  The role of theory and theorising in Design Science research , 2006 .

[24]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Three Cycle View of Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Robert M. O'Keefe,et al.  The action research vs design science debate: reflections from an intervention in eGovernment , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[26]  P. Järvinen.  Action Research is Similar to Design Science , 2007 .

[27]  Fernando Ferreira-Santos,et al.  Revisão Sistemática da Literatura , 2016 .

[28]  P. Checkland,et al.  Action Research: Its Nature and Validity , 1998 .

[29]  D. Gough,et al.  An Introduction to Systematic Reviews , 2017 .

[30]  Paul Veerkamp,et al.  Modeling design processes , 1990 .

[31]  Claudia Löbbecke,et al.  Diversity in Collaborative Information Systems (IS) Research Methods: Academic Breadth or 'Re-Inventing the Wheel'? , 2007, AMCIS.

[32]  Paulo Augusto Cauchick Miguel,et al.  A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research , 2015 .

[33]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[34]  Nj Manson,et al.  Is operations research really research , 2006 .

[35]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  The emergence of design research in information systems in North America , 2008 .

[36]  Linda L. Dawson,et al.  Laptops on Trolleys: Lessons from a Mobile-Wireless Hospital Ward , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[37]  Ann Light,et al.  Participant-Making: bridging the gulf between community knowledge and academic research , 2011, J. Community Informatics.

[38]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  The Design Theory Nexus , 2008, MIS Q..

[39]  John E. Glass,et al.  Review: David Coghlan & Teresa Brannick (2001). Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization , 2002 .

[40]  Boris Otto,et al.  Towards a maturity model for corporate data quality management , 2009, SAC '09.

[41]  Daniel Pacheco Lacerda,et al.  Design Science Research: A Method for Science and Technology Advancement , 2014 .

[42]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[43]  Daniel Firpo,et al.  The Use of Facebook in an Introductory MIS Course: Social Constructivist Learning Environment* , 2012 .

[44]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Action research, emancipation and design thinking , 2004 .