Artificial intelligence guidance of advanced heart failure therapies: A systematic scoping review

Introduction Artificial intelligence can recognize complex patterns in large datasets. It is a promising technology to advance heart failure practice, as many decisions rely on expert opinions in the absence of high-quality data-driven evidence. Methods We searched Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed databases for articles containing “artificial intelligence,” “machine learning,” or “deep learning” and any of the phrases “heart transplantation,” “ventricular assist device,” or “cardiogenic shock” from inception until August 2022. We only included original research addressing post heart transplantation (HTx) or mechanical circulatory support (MCS) clinical care. Review and data extraction were performed in accordance with PRISMA-Scr guidelines. Results Of 584 unique publications detected, 31 met the inclusion criteria. The majority focused on outcome prediction post HTx (n = 13) and post durable MCS (n = 7), as well as post HTx and MCS management (n = 7, n = 3, respectively). One study addressed temporary mechanical circulatory support. Most studies advocated for rapid integration of AI into clinical practice, acknowledging potential improvements in management guidance and reliability of outcomes prediction. There was a notable paucity of external data validation and integration of multiple data modalities. Conclusion Our review showed mounting innovation in AI application in management of MCS and HTx, with the largest evidence showing improved mortality outcome prediction.

[1]  V. Muresan,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Based Intervention in Medical Infrastructure: A Review and Future Trends , 2023, Healthcare.

[2]  Enzo Ferrante,et al.  Addressing fairness in artificial intelligence for medical imaging , 2022, Nature Communications.

[3]  G. Sayer,et al.  Predictors of 1‐year outcome after cardiac re‐transplantation: Machine learning analysis , 2022, Clinical transplantation.

[4]  Lixiang Yan,et al.  Comparison of Four Machine Learning Techniques for Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay in Heart Transplantation Patients , 2022, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[5]  M. Drazner,et al.  Predicting Post-Heart Transplant Composite Renal Outcome Risk in Adults: A Machine Learning Decision Tool , 2022, Kidney international reports.

[6]  P. Heidenreich,et al.  Temporal shift and predictive performance of machine learning for heart transplant outcomes. , 2022, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[7]  Ming Y. Lu,et al.  Deep learning-enabled assessment of cardiac allograft rejection from endomyocardial biopsies , 2022, Nature Medicine.

[8]  Eric Wei,et al.  Whole transcriptome profiling of prospective endomyocardial biopsies reveals prognostic and diagnostic signatures of cardiac allograft rejection. , 2022, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[9]  M. Etemadi,et al.  Evaluation and Mitigation of Racial Bias in Clinical Machine Learning Models: Scoping Review , 2022, JMIR medical informatics.

[10]  J. Staessen,et al.  The novel proteomic signature for cardiac allograft vasculopathy , 2022, ESC heart failure.

[11]  D. Burkhoff,et al.  Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Myocardial Recovery in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device Support , 2021, Circulation. Heart failure.

[12]  Talal A. A. Abdullah,et al.  A Review of Interpretable ML in Healthcare: Taxonomy, Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions , 2021, Symmetry.

[13]  R. Greiner,et al.  An Introduction to Machine Learning Approaches for Biomedical Research , 2021, Frontiers in Medicine.

[14]  M. Drazner,et al.  Phenomapping a Novel Classification System for Patients With Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Devices. , 2021, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  J. Rossano,et al.  The fate of the failing Fontan circulation-No two are alike. , 2021, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[16]  A. Kesselheim,et al.  Mitigating bias in machine learning for medicine , 2021, Communications Medicine.

[17]  Heinrich Schima,et al.  Development of suction detection algorithms for a left ventricular assist device from patient data , 2021, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[18]  N. Dong,et al.  Prediction of 1-year mortality after heart transplantation using machine learning approaches: A single-center study from China. , 2021, International journal of cardiology.

[19]  A. Madabhushi,et al.  An automated computational image analysis pipeline for histological grading of cardiac allograft rejection , 2021, European heart journal.

[20]  T. Sandholm,et al.  Using machine learning to improve survival prediction after heart transplantation , 2021, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[21]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2021, BMJ.

[22]  B. Elger,et al.  Towards a pragmatist dealing with algorithmic bias in medical machine learning , 2021, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.

[23]  R. Padman,et al.  Using machine learning to improve risk prediction in durable left ventricular assist devices , 2021, PloS one.

[24]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  Predicting post-operative right ventricular failure using video-based deep learning , 2021, Nature Communications.

[25]  S. Miyagawa,et al.  Prediction of aortic valve regurgitation after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation using artificial intelligence trained on acoustic spectra , 2021, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[26]  P. Marquet,et al.  Tacrolimus Exposure Prediction Using Machine Learning , 2020, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[27]  Alessandro Blasimme,et al.  Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective , 2020, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[28]  R. Padman,et al.  Machine Learning Approaches to Analyzing Adverse Events Following Durable LVAD Implantation. , 2020, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[29]  Avishek Choudhury,et al.  Use of machine learning in geriatric clinical care for chronic diseases: a systematic literature review , 2020, JAMIA open.

[30]  H. Ishwaran,et al.  Heart Transplantation: An In-Depth Survival Analysis. , 2020, JACC. Heart failure.

[31]  S. Prasad,et al.  Predicting Survival after Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation using Machine Learning. , 2020, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[32]  R. Arsanjani,et al.  Machine learning helps predict long-term mortality and graft failure in patients undergoing heart transplant , 2020, General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[33]  Zain U. Hussain,et al.  Industry ties and evidence in public comments on the FDA framework for modifications to artificial intelligence/machine learning-based medical devices: a cross sectional study , 2019, BMJ Open.

[34]  Xia Hu,et al.  Techniques for interpretable machine learning , 2018, Commun. ACM.

[35]  M. Senni,et al.  Usefulness of regional right ventricular and right atrial strain for prediction of early and late right ventricular failure following a left ventricular assist device implant: A machine learning approach , 2019, The International journal of artificial organs.

[36]  Aaron S Kesselheim,et al.  Lifecycle Regulation of Artificial Intelligence- and Machine Learning-Based Software Devices in Medicine. , 2019, JAMA.

[37]  Mustafa Suleyman,et al.  Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence , 2019, BMC Medicine.

[38]  J. Wilkinson,et al.  Leveraging big data to advance knowledge in pediatric heart failure and heart transplantation. , 2019, Translational pediatrics.

[39]  Megan McCullough,et al.  Predictive Abilities of Machine Learning Techniques May Be Limited by Dataset Characteristics: Insights From the UNOS Database. , 2019, Journal of cardiac failure.

[40]  G. H. Ha,et al.  Global Evolution of Research in Artificial Intelligence in Health and Medicine: A Bibliometric Study , 2019, Journal of clinical medicine.

[41]  Cynthia Rudin,et al.  Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead , 2018, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[42]  C. Gniady,et al.  InDetector – Automatic detection of infected driveline regions , 2018, Smart Health.

[43]  Zhi Chen,et al.  Quantitative 3D Analysis of Coronary Wall Morphology in Heart Transplant Patients: OCT‐Assessed Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Progression , 2018, Medical Image Anal..

[44]  Amir H. Payberah,et al.  Predicting the risk of emergency admission with machine learning: Development and validation using linked electronic health records , 2018, PLoS medicine.

[45]  J. McGowan,et al.  PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation , 2018, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[46]  Danilo Bzdok,et al.  Points of Significance: Statistics versus machine learning , 2018, Nature Methods.

[47]  P. Nugues,et al.  Improving prediction of heart transplantation outcome using deep learning techniques , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[48]  Yorgos Goletsis,et al.  Prediction of time dependent survival in HF patients after VAD implantation using pre- and post-operative data , 2016, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[49]  Mattias Ohlsson,et al.  The International Heart Transplant Survival Algorithm (IHTSA): A New Model to Improve Organ Sharing and Survival , 2015, PloS one.

[50]  G. Collins,et al.  External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[51]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps , 2013, ICLR.

[52]  S. Russell,et al.  Creation of a quantitative recipient risk index for mortality prediction after cardiac transplantation (IMPACT). , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[53]  Dursun Delen,et al.  A machine learning-based approach to prognostic analysis of thoracic transplantations , 2010, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[54]  Dursun Delen,et al.  Predicting the graft survival for heart-lung transplantation patients: An integrated data mining methodology , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[55]  G. Laufer,et al.  Prediction of cyclosporine blood levels in heart transplantation patients using a pharmacokinetic model identified by evolutionary algorithms. , 2005, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[56]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.