Measuring the rate of manual transcription error in outpatient point-of-care testing

Abstract Many point-of-care laboratory tests are manually entered into the electronic health record by ambulatory clinic staff, but the rate of manual transcription error for this testing is poorly characterized. Using a dataset arising from a duplicated workflow that created a set of paired interfaced and manually entered point-of-care glucose measurements, we found that 260 of 6930 (3.7%) manual entries were discrepant from their interfaced result. Thirty-seven of the 260 (14.2%) errors were discrepant by more than 20% and included potentially dangerous mistranscriptions. An additional 37 (14.2%) errors were due to inclusion of non-numeric characters. Staff-entered result flags deviated from the result flag generated in the laboratory information system in 5121 of 6930 (73.9%) pairs. These data demonstrate that clinically significant discrepancies for clinic-entered point of care results occurred at a rate of approximately 5 per 1000 results and they underline the importance of interfacing instruments when feasible.

[1]  Søren Overgaard,et al.  Quality of Data Entry Using Single Entry, Double Entry and Automated Forms Processing–An Example Based on a Study of Patient-Reported Outcomes , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Post-analytical errors with portable glucose meters in the hospital setting. , 2009, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[3]  V. Mohan,et al.  Accuracy of Laboratory Data Communication on ICU Daily Rounds Using an Electronic Health Record* , 2017, Critical care medicine.

[4]  D. Cox,et al.  Evaluating Clinical Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose , 1987, Diabetes Care.

[5]  Michael M. Wagner,et al.  Review: Accuracy of Data in Computer-based Patient Records , 1997, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  Alexis B. Carter,et al.  Patient misidentifications caused by errors in standard bar code technology. , 2010, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  A. Pennisi,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of transcribed computer-stored immunization data. , 1994, Pediatrics.

[8]  D. L. Rossmann,et al.  Data entry errors in an on-line operation. , 1981, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[9]  J. Kinsella,et al.  Variation in the transcription of laboratory data in an intensive care unit , 2004, Anaesthesia.

[10]  J. Coia,et al.  Use of bar code readers and programmable keypads to improve the speed and accuracy of manual data entry in the clinical microbiology laboratory: experience of two laboratories. , 1999, Journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  D. Woodrow,et al.  Types of error within a clinical laboratory. , 1969, The Journal of medical laboratory technology.

[12]  Matthew D. Krasowski,et al.  Implementation of Epic Beaker Clinical Pathology at an academic medical center , 2016, Journal of pathology informatics.

[13]  Woodrow Da,et al.  Types of error within a clinical laboratory. , 1969 .

[14]  J F Tuckerman,et al.  The clinical biochemistry laboratory computer system and result entry: validation of analytical results. , 1985, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[15]  A. Costello,et al.  Error rates in a clinical data repository: lessons from the transition to electronic data transfer—a descriptive study , 2013, BMJ Open.