Interface Style and Training Task Difficulty as Determinants of Effective Computer‐Assisted Knowledge Transfer*

The transfer of expert knowledge to novices is one means of improving decision quality. Research needs to identify (1) the knowledge to be transferred to novices, and (2) the best method for transferring that knowledge. Studies that compare the judgment behavior of experienced and novice auditors address the first issue. The present study addresses the second issue in the context of using a computer-assisted training (CAT) program. CAT was selected for study because of evidence that it can both improve the effectiveness and reduce the costs of training. An experiment was conducted in which two factors were manipulated: (1) the design of the human-computer interface of the CAT program, and (2) the content of training tasks. The judgment of interest involved causal reasoning about the relationships between various internal control procedures and possible errors. The results indicate that alternative styles of interaction with a CAT program differ in terms of learning effectiveness. In addition, there was also evidence that training task content affected learning.

[1]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[2]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Elaborative inferences during reading: do they occur on-line? , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  J. Bransford,et al.  Differences in judgments of learning difficulty. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  Jane L. Butt.  Frequency Judgments In An Auditing-Related Task , 1988 .

[5]  B. Ross.  This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. , 1987 .

[6]  Robert Libby,et al.  Availability And The Generation Of Hypotheses In Analytical Review , 1985 .

[7]  Richard A. Carlson,et al.  Conscious Attention and Abstraction in Concept Learning , 1985 .

[8]  B. Ross.  Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  William J. Clancey,et al.  The Epistemology of a Rule-Based Expert System - A Framework for Explanation , 1981, Artif. Intell..

[10]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[11]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[12]  M. Björkman,et al.  Prediction and diagnosis: an experimental comparison. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[13]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Differences in the precision of self-generated elaborations. , 1982 .

[14]  W. Waller,et al.  The auditor and learning from experience: Some conjectures , 1984 .

[15]  H. Simon,et al.  Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  B. Adelson.  Problem solving and the development of abstract categories in programming languages , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[17]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Skill Acquisition: Compilation of Weak-Method Problem Solutions. , 1987 .

[18]  J. J. Franks,et al.  Learning From Explicit Versus Implicit Texts , 1982 .

[19]  J. Pearl,et al.  Causal and diagnostic inferences: A comparison of validity , 1981 .

[20]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  N. M. Morris,et al.  On Looking into the Black Box: Prospects and Limits in the Search for Mental Models , 1986 .

[22]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Generation and precision of elaboration: Effects on intentional and incidental learning. , 1987 .

[23]  Robert Libby,et al.  Expertise And Auditors Judgments Of Conjunctive Events , 1986 .

[24]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[26]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Elaborative encoding as an explanation of levels of processing , 1982 .

[27]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Discrimination of operator schemata in problem solving: Learning from examples , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Elaborative Interrogation Facilitates Acquisition of Confusing Facts. , 1988 .

[29]  Iris Vessey.  Expertise in Debugging Computer Programs: Situation-Based versus Model-Based Problem Solving , 1985, ICIS.

[30]  J. Hal Reneau,et al.  The Effects of Memory Structure on Using Rule‐Based Expert Systems for Training: A Framework and an Empirical Test* , 1990 .

[31]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-based College Teaching: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1980 .

[32]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[33]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies , 1989 .

[34]  Anita L. Kamouri.  Computer-Based Training: A Cognitive Framework for Evaluating Systems' Designs , 1984 .

[35]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Differences in approaches to learning: An overview. , 1982 .

[36]  W. Waller,et al.  AUDITORS' CAUSAL JUDGMENTS: EFFECTS OF FORWARD VS BACKWARD INFERENCE ON INFORMATION PROCESSING. , 1989 .

[37]  Kirk H. Smith,et al.  Training by Exploration: Facilitating the Transfer of Procedural Knowledge Through Analogical Reasoning , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[38]  L. R. Novick.  Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  J. Reitman,et al.  Knowledge organization and skill differences in computer programmers , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[41]  David D. Woods,et al.  Cognitive Technologies: The Design of Joint Human-Machine Cognitive Systems , 1986, AI Mag..

[42]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[43]  Karl E. Keick.  Cosmos vs. chaos: Sense and nonsense in electronic contexts , 1985 .

[44]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[45]  B. Adelson.  When Novices Surpass Experts: The Difficulty of a Task May Increase With Expertise , 1984 .