Page mode reading with simulated scotomas: A modest effect of interline spacing on reading speed

Crowding is thought to be one potent limiting factor of reading in peripheral vision. While several studies investigated how crowding between horizontally adjacent letters or words can influence eccentric reading, little attention has been paid to the influence of vertically adjacent lines of text. The goal of this study was to examine the dependence of page mode reading performance (speed and accuracy) on interline spacing. A gaze-contingent visual display was used to simulate a visual central scotoma while normally sighted observers read meaningful French sentences following MNREAD principles. The sensitivity of this new material to low-level factors was confirmed by showing strong effects of perceptual learning, print size and scotoma size on reading performance. In contrast, reading speed was only slightly modulated by interline spacing even for the largest range tested: a 26% gain for a 178% increase in spacing. This modest effect sharply contrasts with the dramatic influence of vertical word spacing found in a recent RSVP study. This discrepancy suggests either that vertical crowding is minimized when reading meaningful sentences, or that the interaction between crowding and other factors such as attention and/or visuo-motor control is dependent on the paradigm used to assess reading speed (page vs. RSVP mode).

[1]  T T McMahon,et al.  Fixation characteristics in macular disease. Relationship between saccadic frequency, sequencing, and reading rate. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[3]  Benjamin Rappaz,et al.  Processes involved in oculomotor adaptation to eccentric reading. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Eye movements and reading in macular disease: Further support for the shrinking perceptual span hypothesis , 2006, Vision Research.

[5]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Michael Stur,et al.  Scotoma size and reading speed in patients with subfoveal occult choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[7]  Ronald P. Carver,et al.  Reading Rate: A Review of Research and Theory , 1990 .

[8]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Printed cards for measuring low-vision reading speed , 1995, Vision Research.

[9]  U. Leonards,et al.  Simulation of artificial vision: I. Eccentric reading of isolated words, and perceptual learning , 2003, Vision Research.

[10]  E Peli,et al.  The Role of Context in Reading with Central Field Loss , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[12]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[13]  M. Eckstein,et al.  Optimal observer model of single-fixation oddity search predicts a shallow set-size function. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[14]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—II. Low vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[15]  D Whitaker,et al.  Relative roles of resolution and spatial interference in foveal and peripheral vision. , 1996, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[16]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Reading without saccadic eye movements , 1992, Vision Research.

[17]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XV: Font effects in normal and low vision. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  Peter J. Bex,et al.  Acuity, crowding, reading and fixation stability , 2007, Vision Research.

[20]  G. Legge,et al.  PSYCHOPHYSICS OF READING : IX . THE STABILITY OF EYE POSITION IN NORMAL AND LOW VISION , 2002 .

[21]  E. M. Fine.  Does Meaning Matter? The Impact of Word Knowledge on Lateral Masking , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[22]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[23]  E M Fine,et al.  Effects of cataract and scotoma on visual acuity: a simulation study. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[24]  GORDON E. LEGGE,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low- Vision Reading Test , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[25]  J. Findlay,et al.  The Relationship between Eye Movements and Spatial Attention , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[27]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[28]  Madison Bentley,et al.  Leading and legibility. , 1921 .

[29]  D. Pelli,et al.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[30]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Gary S Rubin,et al.  Reading with simulated scotomas: attending to the right is better than attending to the left , 1999, Vision Research.

[32]  B. Rappaz,et al.  Simulation of artificial vision: II. Eccentric reading of full-page text and the learning of this task , 2004, Vision Research.

[33]  Eric Castet,et al.  Dynamics of attentional deployment during saccadic programming. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[34]  S. Klein,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[35]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Reading Speed Benefits from Increased Vertical Word Spacing in Normal Peripheral Vision , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[36]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Letter-recognition and reading speed in peripheral vision benefit from perceptual learning , 2004, Vision Research.

[38]  D. Levi,et al.  The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea , 1992, Vision Research.

[39]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Capturing attention , 1981, Cognition.

[40]  Gary S Rubin,et al.  Vision rehabilitation for patients with age-related macular degeneration , 2001, Eye.

[41]  D S Loshin,et al.  Reading rates with artificial central scotomata with and without spatial remapping of print. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[42]  Katherine M. Armstrong,et al.  Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  Michael D Crossland,et al.  Preferred retinal locus development in patients with macular disease. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[44]  Susana T. L. Chung.  The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[45]  Donald G. Paterson,et al.  Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading. VIII. Space between lines or leading. , 1932 .

[46]  Alice F Healy,et al.  A blank look in reading: the effect of blank space on the identification of letters and words during reading. , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[47]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. , 1984 .

[48]  Michael D Crossland,et al.  Fixation stability and reading speed in patients with newly developed macular disease * , 2004, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[49]  Gary S Rubin,et al.  Reading with central field loss: number of letters masked is more important than the size of the mask in degrees , 1999, Vision Research.

[50]  George Sperling,et al.  The spatial distribution of visual attention , 2004, Vision Research.

[51]  J. M. Vanderplas,et al.  Some Factors Affecting Legibility of Printed Materials for Older Adults. , 1980 .

[52]  G. Rubin,et al.  Fixation patterns and reading rates in eyes with central scotomas from advanced atrophic age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt disease. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[53]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—V. The role of contrast in normal vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[54]  Edward Awh,et al.  Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? , 2007, Journal of vision.

[55]  Paul J. Beckmann,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading—XIV. The Page Navigation Problem in Using Magnifiers , 1996, Vision Research.

[56]  S. Whittaker,et al.  Scanning characters and reading with a central scotoma. , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[57]  A. Safran,et al.  Development of a viewing strategy during adaptation to an artificial central scotoma , 2004, Vision Research.