Dose-intensive vinorelbine with concurrent granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE We evaluated weekly single-agent intravenous (IV) vinorelbine as salvage therapy for metastatic breast cancer. After the first five patients, all received elective growth factor support with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) in an attempt to maximize delivered dose-intensity (DDI). Objective tumor response, DDI, and toxicity were assessed, as well as time to progression (TTP) and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS This single-center nonrandomized trial enrolled 40 patients. Anthracycline exposure and subsequent progression were common to all patients, and 38 of 40 were paclitaxel-refractory. Vinorelbine was given initially at 30 mg/m2/wk, then at 35 mg/m2/wk in a phase I/II design, which involved first intermittent (6 days of 7) and then continuous (daily) administration of G-CSF at 5 micrograms/kg. RESULTS The maximum-tolerated starting dose was 35 mg/m2/wk with continuous G-CSF support. The mean DDI was 27.7 mg/m2/wk for all patients. There were two complete responses (CRs) and eight partial responses (PRs) in 40 assessable patients for an overall response rate of 25% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13% to 41%). The median TTP was 13 weeks and median survival time 33 weeks. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, with dose delay or reduction required in 14 of 27 patients entered at 35 mg/m2. Febrile neutropenia that required hospitalization was unusual (three of 40 patients, 8%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in nine patients (23%) and 26 patients (65%) required RBC transfusions for anemia. Seven patients (18%) had reversible grade 3/4 nonhematologic complications, primarily related to neurotoxicity. Grade > or = 3 mucositis was absent. CONCLUSION Concurrent administration of weekly vinoralbine and daily G-CSF is feasible and permits an increase in DDI for vinorelbine of 43% to 76% over that reported in series without growth factor support. The response rate, TTP, and survival data are encouraging for therapy given to heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Vinorelbine is not cross-resistant with paclitaxel and should be considered for further trials in the dose-intensified mode made possible by G-CSF, alone or combined with other agents.

[1]  V. Valero,et al.  Phase II trial of docetaxel: a new, highly effective antineoplastic agent in the management of patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  B. Weber,et al.  Intravenous vinorelbine as first-line and second-line therapy in advanced breast cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  L. Hutchins,et al.  Randomized comparison of vinorelbine and melphalan in anthracycline-refractory advanced breast cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  M. Christian,et al.  Paclitaxel activity in heavily pretreated breast cancer: a National Cancer Institute Treatment Referral Center trial. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Mitomycin C and Vinblastine in Advanced Refractory Breast Cancer , 1989, Tumori.

[6]  R. Holle,et al.  Experience of a German multicenter study group with ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer. , 1989, Seminars in oncology.

[7]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  A comparative randomized trial of vinca alkaloids in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma , 1985, Cancer.

[8]  J. Ingle,et al.  Evaluation of vinblastine administered by 5-day continuous infusion in women with advanced breast cancer. , 1984, Cancer treatment reports.

[9]  S. Brenner,et al.  Taxol-requiring mutant of Chinese hamster ovary cells with impaired mitotic spindle assembly , 1983, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  J. Fontana,et al.  Phase II study of vindesine in patients with advanced breast cancer. , 1982, Cancer treatment reports.

[11]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Vindesine in the treatment of refractory breast cancer: improvement in therapeutic index with continuous 5-day infusion. , 1981, Cancer treatment reports.

[12]  P. Schiff,et al.  Taxol stabilizes microtubules in mouse fibroblast cells. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.