Multi objective new product development in bakery production under fuzzy demand parameters

This paper deals with the problem of multi objective new product development and its solution with an intelligent approach. The proposed approach uses fuzzy parameters for economic analysis and combines a multi-criteria decision making method to goal programming. In economic analysis, fuzzy life cycle costs and fuzzy life cycle pricing are considered with respect to demand changes during life cycle of new product alternatives. Fuzzy equivalent worth of each new product alternative is determined using fuzzy life cycle monetary input, and results are input to the multi-criteria analysis. The selected multi-criteria analysis tool is TOPSIS in the paper and some additional judgmental criteria are also considered to rank new product alternatives. The preference weights used to rank alternatives are then fed to a goal programming model which makes an ultimate selection of new product(s) to be produced in the manufacturing system under capacity, sales potential, and workforce balance constraints. The goal programming model has an objective of minimizing the weighted sum of positive deviation from target total cost and negative deviation from target total preference weights. The proposed approach is then implemented using real data of a continuous production system for the need of introducing new products into market.

[1]  Don Gunther,et al.  Quality Function Deployment - How to Make QFD Work for You , 2000 .

[2]  Dimitris Askounis,et al.  A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  S. Emre Alptekin,et al.  Product evaluation and development process using a fuzzy compromise-based goal programming approach , 2008, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[4]  Petri Suomala,et al.  The Life Cycle Dimension Of New Product Development Performance Measurement , 2004 .

[5]  Seyed Ahmad Yazdian,et al.  Vendor Selection Using a New Fuzzy Group TOPSIS Approach , 2009 .

[6]  Chin-Hung Liu,et al.  A fuzzy group decision-making model with risk-taking attitudes in quality function deployment , 2009, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[7]  Abdelwaheb Rebai,et al.  BBTOPSIS: a bag based technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution , 1993 .

[8]  Ming-Chyuan Lin,et al.  Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[9]  Irem Ozkarahan,et al.  COLLABORATIVE PRODUCTION-DISTRIBUTION PLANNING IN SUPPLY CHAIN: A FUZZY GOAL PROGRAMMING APPROACH , 2008 .

[10]  A. Çagri Tolga,et al.  Fuzzy multicriteria R&D project selection with a real options valuation model , 2008, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[11]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) , 2004 .

[12]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[13]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives , 2007, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[14]  Y. S. Rajan,et al.  New product development: challenges of globalisation , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[15]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[16]  Juite Wang,et al.  A possibilistic decision model for new product supply chain design , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[18]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study , 2000 .