A combination line transect and capture-recapture sampling model for multiple observers in aerial surveys

We present a robust sampling methodology to estimate population size using line transect and capture-recapture procedures for aerial surveys. Aerial surveys usually underestimate population density due to animals being missed. A combination of capture-recapture and line transect sampling methods with multiple observers allows violation of the assumption that all animals on the centreline are sighted from the air. We illustrate our method with an example of inanimate objects which shows evidence of failure of the assumption that all objects on the centreline have probability 1 of being detected. A simulation study is implemented to evaluate the performance of three variations of the Lincoln-Petersen estimator: the overall estimator, the stratified estimator, and the general stratified estimator based on the combined likelihood proposed in this paper. The stratified Lincoln-Petersen estimator based on the combined likelihood is found to be generally superior to the other estimators.

[1]  K. Pollock.  A Family of Density Estimators for Line-Transect Sampling , 1978 .

[2]  J. Nichols,et al.  Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments , 1992 .

[3]  Stephen T. Buckland,et al.  Fitting Density Functions with Polynomials , 1992 .

[4]  Lyman L. McDonald,et al.  Size Bias in Line Transect Sampling , 1987 .

[5]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations , 1983 .

[6]  T. Styš.  An extension of the maximum principle , 1988 .

[7]  M. Otto,et al.  Size Bias in Line Transect Sampling: A Field Test , 1990 .

[8]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Line transect estimation of bird population density using a Fourier series , 1981 .

[9]  B. Efron.  The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[10]  D. Borchers,et al.  Mark-Recapture Models for Line Transect Surveys , 1998 .

[11]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Distance Sampling-Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. , 1994 .

[12]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  Visibility bias in aerial surveys a review of estimation procedures , 1987 .

[13]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Estimation of Density from Line Transect Sampling of Biological Populations. , 1982 .

[14]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Robust estimation from line transect data , 1979 .

[15]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Wildlife Monographs: Estimation of Density from Line Transect Sampling of Biological Populations , 1981 .

[16]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Horvitz-Thompson Estimators for Double-Platform Line Transect Surveys , 1998 .

[17]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation for the Double-Count Method With Independent Observers , 1996 .

[18]  Gary C. White,et al.  Numerical estimation of survival rates from band-recovery and biotelemetry data , 1983 .

[19]  D. G. Chapman.  Some properties of the hypergeometric distribution with applications to zoölogical somple censuses , 1951 .

[20]  D. Rasch,et al.  Seber, G.A.F.: The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters. Griffin, London 1973, 1. Aufl. XII, 506 S., 34 Abb., 116 Tab., £ 12,— , 1974 .

[21]  Stephen T. Buckland,et al.  A robust line transect method , 1992 .

[22]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations , 1980 .

[23]  T. Quinn.  Line transect estimators for schooling populations , 1985 .

[24]  G. Seber.  The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters , 1974 .

[25]  J. Horwood,et al.  International Whaling Commission/International Decade of Cetacean Research (IWC/IDCR) Southern Minke Whale assessment cruise, 1978–79 , 1980, Polar Record.

[26]  D. R. Anderson,et al.  Correction of bias in belt transect studies of immotile objects , 1970 .

[27]  R. Lanctot,et al.  A line transect model for aerial surveys , 1991 .

[28]  Line Transect Sampling with Unknown Probability of Detection Along the Transect , 1989 .