Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries

Abstract Objective: To assess the feasibility and impact of introducing the Ottawa ankle rules to a large number of physicians in a wide variety of hospital and community settings over a prolonged period of time. Design: Multicentre before and after controlled clinical trial. Setting: Emergency departments of eight teaching and community hospitals in Canadian communities (population 10000 to 3000000). Subjects: All 12777 adults (6288 control, 6489 intervention) seen with acute ankle injuries during two 12 month periods before and after the intervention. Intervention: More than 200 physicians of varying experience were taught to order radiography according to the Ottawa ankle rules. Main outcome measures: Referral for ankle and foot radiography. Results: There were significant reductions in use of ankle radiography at all eight hospitals and within a priori subgroups: for all hospitals combined 82.8% control v 60.9% intervention (P<0.001); for community hospitals 86.7% v 61.7%; (P<0.001); for teaching hospitals 77.9% v 59.9%; (P<0.001); for emergency physicians 82.1% v 61.6%; (P<0.001); for family physicians 84.3% v 60.1%; (P<0.001); and for housestaff 82.3% v 60.1%; (P<0.001). Compared with patients without fracture who had radiography during the intervention period those who had no radiography spent less time in the emergency department (54.0 v 86.9 minutes; P<0.001) and had lower medical charges ($70.20 v $161.60; P<0.001). There was no difference in the rate of fractures diagnosed after discharge from the emergency department (0.5 v 0.4%). Conclusions: Introduction of the Ottawa ankle rules proved to be feasible in a large variety of hospital and community settings. Use of the rules over a prolonged period of time by many physicians of varying experience led to a decrease in ankle radiography, waiting times, and costs without an increased rate of missed fractures. The multiphase methodological approach used to develop and implement these rules may be applied to other clinical problems.

[1]  Mark Reardon,et al.  Decision Rules for the Use of Radiography in Acute Ankle Injuries Refinement and Prospective Validation , 1993 .

[2]  I. Stiell,et al.  A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. , 1992, Annals of emergency medicine.

[3]  J. Svenson NEED FOR RADIOGRAPHS IN THE ACUTELY INJURED ANKLE , 1988, The Lancet.

[4]  S. Schappert National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1992 Emergency Department Summary. , 1997, Vital and health statistics. Series 13, Data from the National Health Survey.

[5]  L. Ryd,et al.  Isolated fracture of the lateral malleolus requires no treatment. 49 prospective cases of supination-eversion type II ankle fractures. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[6]  J. Eisenberg,et al.  Changing physicians' practices. , 1993, Tobacco control.

[7]  P Diehr,et al.  Prediction of Fracture in Patients with Acute MusculosKeletal Ankle Trauma , 1988, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[8]  I. Stiell,et al.  Interobserver agreement in the examination of acute ankle injury patients. , 1992, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[9]  D. Yates,et al.  Sprain or fracture? An analysis of 2000 ankle injuries. , 1986, Archives of emergency medicine.

[10]  S P Azen,et al.  OBTAINING CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE RISK RATIO IN COHORT STUDIES , 1978 .

[11]  Phyllis J. Kornguth,et al.  Protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need X-rays. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  A. Long Radiographic decision-making by the emergency physician. , 1985, Emergency medicine clinics of North America.

[13]  R. Stephens,et al.  Clinical trials and clinical practice , 1993, The Lancet.

[14]  A Laupacis,et al.  Initiating, conducting and maintaining guidelines development programs. , 1993, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[15]  R. Norris,et al.  Clinical trials and clinical practice , 1993, The Lancet.

[16]  S. C. Brooks,et al.  Inversion injuries of the ankle: clinical assessment and radiographic review. , 1981, British medical journal.

[17]  H. Sox,et al.  Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  T. Nesbitt Cost containment and the physician. , 1978, Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards.

[19]  J. Y. Thomson,et al.  Can more efficient use be made of x ray examinations in the accident and emergency department? , 1987, British medical journal.

[20]  D. E. Rogers,et al.  Medical technology -- a different view of the contentious debate over costs. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  W. Clarke,et al.  The ankle injury--indications for the selective use of X-rays. , 1983, Injury.

[22]  A R Feinstein,et al.  The 'chagrin factor' and qualitative decision analysis. , 1985, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  A. Montague,et al.  Clinical assessment of apparently sprained ankle and detection of fracture. , 1985, Injury.

[24]  I. Stiell,et al.  Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation. , 1993, JAMA.

[25]  A. M. Clarfield Standards, guidelines and clinical policies. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[26]  S. Lloyd Selective radiographic assessment of acute ankle injuries in the emergency department: barriers to implementation. , 1986, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[27]  I. Stiell,et al.  Use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: physicians' attitudes and practice. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[28]  M. G. Matthews,et al.  Guidelines for selective radiological assessment of inversion ankle injuries , 1986, British medical journal.

[29]  G. Anderson,et al.  Implementing practice guidelines. , 1993, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[30]  I. Stiell A study to develop clinical decision rules for the emergency department use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. , 1991 .

[31]  I. Stiell,et al.  Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules. , 1994, JAMA.

[32]  B. Ashworth,et al.  Death from interventionist radiology: a cautionary tale , 1986 .

[33]  Incidence of minor fractures in twisting injuries of the ankle. , 1974, Injury.