Exergy-based efficiency and renewability assessment of biofuel production.

This study presents an efficiency and renewability analysis of the production of three biofuels: rapeseed methyl ester (RME), soybean methyl ester (SME) and corn-based ethanol (EtOH). The overall production chains have been taken into account: not only the agricultural crop production and the industrial conversion into biofuel, but also production of the supply of agricultural resources (pesticides, fertilizers, fuel, seeding material) and industrial resources (energy and chemicals) to transform the crops into biofuel. Simultaneously, byproducts of the agricultural and industrial processes have been taken into account when resources have to be allocated to the biofuels. The technical analysis via the second law of thermodynamics revealed that corn-based EtOH results in the highest production rate with an exergetic fuel content of 68.8 GJ ha(-1) yr(-1), whereas the RME and SME results were limited to 47.5 and 16.4 GJ ha(-1) yr(-1). The allocated nonrenewable resource input to deliver these biofuels is significant: 16.5, 15.4, and 5.6 MJ ha(-1) yr(-1). This means that these biofuels, generally considered as renewable resources, embed a nonrenewable fraction of one-quarter for EtOH and even one-third for RME and SME. This type of analysis provides scientifically sound quantitative information that is necessarywith respect to the sustainability analysis of so-called renewable energy.

[1]  Jo P Dewulf,et al.  Quantitative assessment of solid waste treatment systems in the industrial ecology perspective by exergy analysis. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Göran Wall,et al.  Conditions and tools in the design of energy conversion and management systems of a sustainable society , 2002 .

[3]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Expanding exergy analysis to account for ecosystem products and services. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Assessment of the sustainability of technology by means of a thermodynamically based life cycle analysis , 2002, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[5]  P. Hansson,et al.  Energy- and exergy analysis of rape seed oil methyl ester (RME) production under Swedish conditions , 1999 .

[6]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Exergetic material input per unit of service (EMIPS) for the assessment of resource productivity of transport commodities , 2003 .

[7]  H. V. Bekkum,et al.  From fossil to green , 1999 .

[8]  Robert S. Boethling,et al.  Handbook of Property Estimation Methods for Chemicals : Environmental Health Sciences , 2000 .

[9]  J. Dewulf,et al.  Integrating industrial ecology principles into a set of environmental sustainability indicators for technology assessment. , 2005 .

[10]  John Sheehan,et al.  An Overview of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel Life Cycles , 2000 .

[11]  Y. Çengel,et al.  Thermodynamics : An Engineering Approach , 1989 .

[12]  H. J. Van Der Kooi,et al.  The sustainability of resource utilization , 2002 .

[13]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Analysis of sectoral energy and exergy use of Saudi Arabia , 2004 .

[14]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Illustrations towards quantifying the sustainability of technology , 2000 .

[15]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  A Comprehensive Energy and Economic Assessment of Biofuels: When “Green” Is Not Enough , 2001 .