EXPLORATION THROUGH DRAWINGS IN THE CONCEPTUAL STAGE OF PRODUCT DESIGN

This paper argues that sequences of exploratory drawings - constructed by designer's movements and decisions - trace systematic and logical paths from ideas to designs. This argument has three parts. First, sequences of exploratory sketches produced by product designers, against the same task specification, are analyzed in terms of the cognitive categories of reinterpretation, emergence and abstraction. Second, a computational model is outlined for the process of exploration through drawing and third the model is applied to elucidate the logic in the sequences of exploratory sketches examined earlier.

[1]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture , 1994 .

[2]  John S. Gero,et al.  Creativity, emergence and evolution in design , 1996, Knowl. Based Syst..

[3]  Peter van Sommers,et al.  Drawing and cognition: Frontmatter , 1984 .

[4]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design , 1994 .

[5]  Martin Stacey,et al.  Psychological challenges for the analysis of style , 2006, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[6]  James R. Rinderle,et al.  Models and abstractions in design , 1991 .

[7]  Ömer Akin,et al.  Variants in Design Cognition , 2001 .

[8]  W. Newstetter,et al.  Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education , 2001 .

[9]  Gyorgy Kepes,et al.  Language of Vision , 1944 .

[10]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[11]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Towards an ‘ideal’ approach for concept generation , 2003 .

[12]  Jay McCormack,et al.  Speaking the Buick Language: Capturing, Understanding, and Exploring Brand Identity With Shape Grammars , 2004 .

[13]  Merideth Leigh Gattis,et al.  Spatial schemas and abstract thought , 2001 .

[14]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Languages and semantics of grammatical discrete structures , 1999, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[15]  John S. Gero,et al.  Drawings and the design process , 1998 .

[16]  Terry Knight,et al.  Computing with Emergence , 2003 .

[17]  E. Edmonds,et al.  The cognitive basis of emergence: implications for design support , 1996 .

[18]  Iestyn Jowers,et al.  On curves and computation with shapes , 2004 .

[19]  J. Gero,et al.  UNEXPECTED DISCOVERIES : HOW DESIGNERS DISCOVER HIDDEN FEATURES IN SKETCHES , 1999 .

[20]  Jonathan Stephen Fish,et al.  Amplifying the Mind’s Eye: Sketching and Visual Cognition , 1990 .

[21]  Henri Christiaans,et al.  Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education , 2002 .

[22]  J. Hollerbach,et al.  Visual cognition and action , 1990 .

[23]  Donald A. Schön Designing: Rules, types and worlds , 1988 .

[24]  G. Stiny Introduction to Shape and Shape Grammars , 1980 .

[25]  Eugene S. Ferguson,et al.  Engineering and the Mind's Eye , 1994 .

[26]  Ellen Yi-Luen Do,et al.  Drawing as a Means to Design Reasoning , 1996 .

[27]  T. Knight Computing with Ambiguity , 2003 .

[28]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  What designers know , 2018, The Design Student’s Journey.

[29]  George Stiny,et al.  Shape: Talking about Seeing and Doing , 2006 .

[30]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Spatial schemas in depictions , 1999 .

[31]  V. Goel Sketches of thought , 1995 .

[32]  George Stiny,et al.  Shape Grammars and the Generative Specification of Painting and Sculpture , 1971, IFIP Congress.

[33]  R. Arnheim Art and Visual Perception, a Psychology of the Creative Eye , 1967 .

[34]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Constructive Perception: A Metacognitive Skill for Coordinating Perception and Conception , 2003 .

[35]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing , 1992 .

[36]  Branko Kolarevic,et al.  Designing with regulating lines and geometric relations , 1997 .

[37]  Paul Rodgers,et al.  Visible ideas:Information patterns of conceptual sketch activity , 1998 .

[38]  Iestyn Jowers,et al.  IMPROVING PRODUCT DESIGN VIA A SHAPE GRAMMAR TOOL , 2004 .