Coupled fast and slow feedbacks lead to continual evolution: A general modeling approach

The Red Queen Hypothesis, which suggests that continual evolution can result from solely biotic interactions, has been studied in macroevolutionary and microevolutionary contexts. While the latter has been effective in describing examples in which evolution does not cease, describing which properties lead to continual evolution or to stasis remains a major challenge. In many contexts it is unclear which assumptions are necessary for continual evolution, and whether described behavior is robust under perturbations. Our aim here is to prove continual evolution under minimal conditions and in a general framework, thus automatically obtaining robustness. We show that the combination of a fast positive and a slow negative feedback causes continual evolution with a single evolving trait, provided the ecological timescale is sufficiently separated from the timescales of mutations and negative feedback. Our approach and results form a next step towards a deeper understanding of the evolutionary dynamics resulting from biotic interactions.

[1]  Paul Marrow,et al.  The coevolution of predator—prey interactions : ESSS and Red Queen dynamics , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  P. Abrams The Evolution of Predator-Prey Interactions: Theory and Evidence , 2000 .

[3]  Tracey Chapman,et al.  Running with the Red Queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Anton Crombach,et al.  Evolution of Evolvability in Gene Regulatory Networks , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  F Dercole,et al.  Coevolution of slow–fast populations: evolutionary sliding, evolutionary pseudo-equilibria and complex Red Queen dynamics , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  N. Stenseth,et al.  COEVOLUTION IN ECOSYSTEMS: RED QUEEN EVOLUTION OR STASIS? , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  J. D. van der Laan,et al.  Predator—prey coevolution: interactions across different timescales , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Frank J. Bruggeman,et al.  Evolutionary pressures on microbial metabolic strategies in the chemostat , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[9]  S. Ellner,et al.  Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator–prey system , 2003, Nature.

[10]  Martijn Egas,et al.  Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics of Ecological Stoichiometry in Plankton Communities , 2018, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Benjamin H. Good,et al.  The Dynamics of Molecular Evolution Over 60,000 Generations , 2017, Nature.

[12]  Jan Martin Nordbotten,et al.  Asymmetric ecological conditions favor Red-Queen type of continued evolution over stasis , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Jülich Evolutionary Cycling in Predator – Prey Interactions : Population Dynamics and the Red Queen , 1994 .

[14]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  On evolution under asymmetric competition , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.

[15]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  Evolution towards oscillation or stability in a predator–prey system , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Éva Kisdi,et al.  Red Queen Evolution by Cycles of Evolutionary Branching and Extinction , 2000 .

[17]  Anton Crombach,et al.  Chromosome rearrangements and the evolution of genome structuring and adaptability. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  Paul Marrow,et al.  Evolutionary Instability in Predator-prey Systems , 1993 .

[19]  Michael J. Wiser,et al.  Long-Term Dynamics of Adaptation in Asexual Populations , 2013, Science.

[20]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A new evolutionary law , 1973 .

[21]  L. H. Liow,et al.  Red Queen: from populations to taxa and communities. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  Nils Chr. Stenseth,et al.  The role of biotic forces in driving macroevolution: beyond the Red Queen , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution : A Derivation from Stochastic Ecological Processes , 1996 .

[24]  Artem Kaznatcheev Computational Complexity as an Ultimate Constraint on Evolution , 2019, Genetics.

[25]  Geerat J. Vermeij,et al.  Reining in the Red Queen: the dynamics of adaptation and extinction reexamined , 2013, Paleobiology.

[26]  Alexander I Khibnik,et al.  Three mechanisms of Red Queen dynamics , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  G. Vermeij Unsuccessful Predation and Evolution , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[28]  T. Quinn,et al.  Eco-evolutionary dynamics in Pacific salmon , 2011, Heredity.

[29]  Meike T. Wortel,et al.  Eco-evolutionary Red Queen dynamics regulate biodiversity in a metabolite-driven microbial system , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[30]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Diversity and Coevolutionary Dynamics in High-Dimensional Phenotype Spaces* , 2017, The American Naturalist.