Are bryophyte communities different

AbstractIt has been suggested that bryophyte communities differ from those of higher plants, in that species coexistence is not limited by inter-specific competition. To test this hypothesis, bryophyte ‘lawns’ were-sampled at six locations in southern New Zealand. At each site, 625 quadrats, each ca 1 X 1cm, were arranged on a contiguous grid.Variance in quadrat richness was significantly less than expected on a random basis at four sites, with the same trend in a fifth, i.e. quadrat richness was relatively constant. Since a patch model was used to reduce the effects of micro-environmental variation and spatial autocorrelation, this suggests that competition was restricting coexistence. The degree of restriction was similar to that found previously in grass lawn communities.Species association was calculated on a patch basis, examining only small spatial-scale deviations from expectations. At four- sites this gave only negative associations. At the other two sites there were both positive and negative ass...

[1]  M. Sykes,et al.  Time and space in the community structure of a species-rich limestone grassland , 1995 .

[2]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Assembly Rules Demonstrated in a Saltmarsh Community , 1995 .

[3]  J. Wilson Null models for assembly rules: the Jack Horner effect is more insidious than the Narcissus effect , 1995 .

[4]  J. Wilson,et al.  Guilds and assembly rules in lawn communities , 1994 .

[5]  J. Wilson Who makes the assembly rules , 1994 .

[6]  S. Roxburgh,et al.  A demonstration of guild-based assembly rules for a plant community, and determination of intrinsic guilds , 1994 .

[7]  S. Roxburgh,et al.  Lawns have vertical stratification , 1993 .

[8]  H. Rydin Interspecific competition between Sphagnum mosses on a raised bog , 1993 .

[9]  S. Roxburgh,et al.  Limitation to plant species coexistence at a point: a study in a New Zealand lawn , 1992 .

[10]  J. Wilson,et al.  Fine-scale community structure of lawns , 1992 .

[11]  Paul C. Marino,et al.  Competition between mosses (Splachnaceae) in patchy habitats , 1991 .

[12]  J. Wilson,et al.  Does Vegetation Science exist , 1991 .

[13]  T. Schoener,et al.  Greater Resolution of Distributional Complementarities by Controlling for Habitat Affinities: A Study with Bahamian Lizards and Birds , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[14]  William G. Lee,et al.  A remnant New Zealand carr , 1991 .

[15]  J. Gentle,et al.  Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. , 1990 .

[16]  N. Slack Bryophytes and ecological niche theory , 1990 .

[17]  M. Sykes,et al.  The use of the Cole/Hurlbert C8 association coefficient in inverse ecological classification , 1990 .

[18]  C. Gimingham,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Bryophyte Interactions on a Dry Heathland , 1989 .

[19]  E. Pianka Guild structure in desert lizards , 1980 .

[20]  M. Watson Patterns of Habitat Occupation in Mosses-Relevance to Considerations of the Niche , 1980 .

[21]  D. Vitt,et al.  The dynamics of moss establishment: temporal responses to a moisture gradient , 1995 .

[22]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Community structure (niche limitation and guild proportionality) in relation to the effect of spatial scale, in a Nothofagus forest sampled with a circular transect , 1993 .

[23]  F. L. Twenhöven Competition between two Sphagnum species under different deposition levels , 1992 .

[24]  J. Wiens The Ecology of Bird Communities: Acknowledgments , 1989 .

[25]  A. Gentry,et al.  Changes in Plant Community Diversity and Floristic Composition on Environmental and Geographical Gradients , 1988 .

[26]  K. Mägdefrau Life-forms of Bryophytes , 1982 .

[27]  Stuart H. Hurlbert,et al.  A Coefficient of Interspecific Assciation , 1969 .