Achieving Coordination in Prehension: Joint Freezing and Postural Contributions.

The focus of the present study was on the intersegmental relationships that emerge when both task and oganismic constraints are imposed upon the coordination system. Seven right-handed subjects were required to reach and grasp a cup (hand transport phase) and place it on a designated target (cup transport phase), using either their preferred or nonpreferred hand. The kinematics of the movement were examined as a function of task (grasping a full cup versus grasping an empty one) and organismic (preferred or nonpreferred hand) constraints. During the hand transport phase, a task constraint effect was revealed through an increase in the low-velocity phase for the full cup condition. This constraint coexisted with a decrease in angular motion of the shoulder and elbow joints, indicating subjects reduced the number of variables to be independently controlled in the final homing-in stage of the movement. Accompanying this decrease in angular change was an increase in the displacement of the trunk. During the cup transport phase, the trunk was shown to contribute significantly more to the movement in the full cup condition and for the left hand movements, thereby increasing the stability of the movement system. These findings are in agreement with Bernstein's (1967) notion of fixating parts of the body as an initial solution to a movement problem, and they lend support to the concept of a proximodistal organization of coordination.

[1]  B. Vereijken,et al.  Free(z)ing Degrees of Freedom in Skill Acquisition , 1992 .

[2]  R. Emmerik,et al.  The effects of practice on limb kinematics in a throwing task. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[3]  S. A. Wallace,et al.  Temporal constraints in the control of prehensile movement. , 1988, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Constraints on the Development of Coordination , 1986 .

[5]  P. N. Kugler,et al.  Search Strategies and the Acquisition of Coordination , 1989 .

[6]  A. Wing,et al.  The Contribution of the Thumb to Reaching Movements , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[8]  P Haggard,et al.  Task coordination in human prehension. , 1991, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  C Fraser,et al.  A case study of reaching by a user of a manually-operated artificial hand , 1981, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[10]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  A. Wing,et al.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[13]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  The influence of task and organismic constraints on intralimb and pen-point kinematics in a drawing task , 1990 .

[14]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[15]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  The acquisition of coordination: Preliminary analysis of learning to write , 1989 .

[16]  C L MacKenzie,et al.  Is object texture a constraint on human prehension?: kinematic evidence. , 1991, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  M. Jeannerod Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[18]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  The effects of object weight on the kinematics of prehension. , 1991, Journal of motor behavior.