Gene regulation in the 3D genome.

The spatial organization of the genome is essential for the precise control of gene expression. Recent advances in sequencing and imaging technologies allow us to explore the 3D genome and its relationship to gene regulation at an unprecedented scale. In this review, we provide an overview of lessons learned from studying the chromatin structure and their implications in communications between gene promoters and distal cis-regulatory elements, such as enhancers. We first review the current knowledge of general genome organization, followed by the importance of chromatin folding in gene regulation. Next, we proceed to a brief survey of the recently developed chromosome conformation capture technologies, as well as most widely adopted read-outs from such data. We then introduce two emerging models that offer explanations regarding how distal enhancers achieve transcriptional control of target genes in the 3D genome. Last, we discuss the promising prospects of leveraging knowledge in chromatin spatial organization for studying complex diseases and traits. General Features of Genome Structure To fit the entire genome of 2-m-long human DNA sequences, containing 3 billion nucleotides, in the nucleus of a diameter of 10 mm, DNA has to be packed and organized achieving 10 compaction. In vitro structure study of the chromatin showed that every 146 bp of DNA is wrapped around nucleosome (11 nm diameter), providing 5–6 compaction. At the next level, nucleosomes are compacted into the 30 nm chromatin fiber, achieving an additional 50 compaction (1). The chromatin is thought to be further compacted into fibers sized several nanometers. However, this hierarchical model of chromosome compaction was challenged by new findings of chromatin structure in nucleus using ChromEMT (2). Unlike in vitro, chromatin is a disorganized chain with diameter 5–24 nm in situ. Chromatin chains are flexible and compacted in different densities with various particle arrangements and conformations (2). Such observation suggests that chromatin fibers are organized at different local chromatin concentrations instead of being folded in a hierarchical order. It remains elusive how precisely such observed chromatin polymer structure determines DNA accessibilities and gene regulation. We learned chromosomes are organized in chromosome territories as the basic structure of genome organization by cell biology studies (3) (Fig. 1A). Chromosome territories are arranged in a somewhat nonrandom fashion so that small, gene-rich chromosomes tend to locate at the center of the nucleus (4). More recently, molecular approaches with chromatin conformation assays have revealed many insights regarding chromatin structure at different resolutions. For example, the first survey of genome-wide chromatin interaction, at 1 Mb resolution, showed that the genome is partitioned into compartments ‘A’ and ‘B’. ‘A’ is the open and actively transcribed regions and ‘B’ the compacted and repressed regions of the genome (5) (Fig. 1B). Later, several studies were conducted in an attempt to gain a better understanding of spatial organization of genomes by increasing data resolution with in-depth sequencing (6,7). Collective results from these Received: April 30, 2018. Revised: April 30, 2018. Accepted: April 30, 2018 VC The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com R228 Human Molecular Genetics, 2018, Vol. 27, No. R2 R228–R233 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy164 Advance Access Publication Date: 14 May 2018

[1]  Hans-Martin Herz Enhancer deregulation in cancer and other diseases , 2016, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[2]  Lee E. Edsall,et al.  A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome , 2012, Nature.

[3]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Mediator and Cohesin Connect Gene Expression and Chromatin Architecture , 2010, Nature.

[4]  Peter H. L. Krijger,et al.  Regulation of disease-associated gene expression in the 3D genome , 2016, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[5]  Jennifer E. Phillips-Cremins,et al.  Architectural Protein Subclasses Shape 3D Organization of Genomes during Lineage Commitment , 2013, Cell.

[6]  Judith B. Zaugg,et al.  Genetic Control of Chromatin States in Humans Involves Local and Distal Chromosomal Interactions , 2015, Cell.

[7]  Job Dekker,et al.  The 4 D nucleome project , 2017 .

[8]  Bing Ren,et al.  MAPPING OF LONG-RANGE CHROMATIN INTERACTIONS BY PROXIMITY LIGATION ASSISTED CHIP-SEQ , 2016 .

[9]  Nuno A. Fonseca,et al.  Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal , 2017, Nature.

[10]  A. Tanay,et al.  Probabilistic modeling of Hi-C contact maps eliminates systematic biases to characterize global chromosomal architecture , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[11]  Manolis Kellis,et al.  FTO Obesity Variant Circuitry and Adipocyte Browning in Humans. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Sébastien Phan,et al.  ChromEMT: Visualizing 3D chromatin structure and compaction in interphase and mitotic cells , 2017, Science.

[13]  J. Dekker,et al.  Capturing Chromosome Conformation , 2002, Science.

[14]  Len A. Pennacchio,et al.  Enhancer Variants Synergistically Drive Dysfunction of a Gene Regulatory Network In Hirschsprung Disease , 2016, Cell.

[15]  S. Mundlos,et al.  Breaking TADs: How Alterations of Chromatin Domains Result in Disease. , 2016, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[16]  D. Duboule,et al.  Topology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes , 2013, Nature.

[17]  B. Steensel,et al.  Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture–on-chip (4C) , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[18]  O. Delaneau,et al.  Population Variation and Genetic Control of Modular Chromatin Architecture in Humans , 2015, Cell.

[19]  Yan Li,et al.  A high-resolution map of three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells , 2013, Nature.

[20]  Jacob C. Ulirsch,et al.  Systematic Functional Dissection of Common Genetic Variation Affecting Red Blood Cell Traits , 2016, Cell.

[21]  E. Liu,et al.  An Oestrogen Receptor α-bound Human Chromatin Interactome , 2009, Nature.

[22]  I. Amit,et al.  Erez Lieberman-Aiden Principles of the Human Genome Comprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding , 2012 .

[23]  J. Sedat,et al.  Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre , 2012, Nature.

[24]  Shawn M. Gillespie,et al.  Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas , 2015, Nature.

[25]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Analysis methods for studying the 3D architecture of the genome , 2015, Genome Biology.

[26]  A. Tanay,et al.  Multiscale 3D Genome Rewiring during Mouse Neural Development , 2017, Cell.

[27]  Trieu Nguyen,et al.  Enhancer connectome in primary human cells reveals target genes of disease-associated DNA elements , 2017, bioRxiv.

[28]  Daning Lu,et al.  Chromosome conformation elucidates regulatory relationships in developing human brain , 2016, Nature.

[29]  J. Carroll,et al.  Pioneer transcription factors: establishing competence for gene expression. , 2011, Genes & development.

[30]  C. Nusbaum,et al.  Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. , 2006, Genome research.

[31]  S. Mundlos,et al.  Formation of new chromatin domains determines pathogenicity of genomic duplications , 2016, Nature.

[32]  Peter Teague,et al.  Differences in the Localization and Morphology of Chromosomes in the Human Nucleus , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  Jesse R. Dixon,et al.  Topological Domains in Mammalian Genomes Identified by Analysis of Chromatin Interactions , 2012, Nature.

[34]  Neva C. Durand,et al.  A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping , 2014, Cell.

[35]  Tom Maniatis,et al.  Transcriptional activation: A complex puzzle with few easy pieces , 1994, Cell.

[36]  R. Young,et al.  A Phase Separation Model for Transcriptional Control , 2017, Cell.

[37]  M. Groudine,et al.  Controlling the double helix , 2003, Nature.

[38]  Bing Ren,et al.  The Three-Dimensional Organization of Mammalian Genomes. , 2017, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[39]  Giacomo Cavalli,et al.  Organization and function of the 3 D genome , 2022 .

[40]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  HiChIP: efficient and sensitive analysis of protein-directed genome architecture , 2016, Nature Methods.

[41]  Daniel S. Day,et al.  Insulated Neighborhoods: Structural and Functional Units of Mammalian Gene Control , 2016, Cell.

[42]  Anthony D. Schmitt,et al.  A Compendium of Chromatin Contact Maps Reveals Spatially Active Regions in the Human Genome. , 2016, Cell reports.

[43]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  HiCRep: assessing the reproducibility of Hi-C data using a stratum-adjusted correlation coefficient , 2017, bioRxiv.

[44]  Ming Hu,et al.  HiCNorm: removing biases in Hi-C data via Poisson regression , 2012, Bioinform..

[45]  B. Ren,et al.  Genome organization and long-range regulation of gene expression by enhancers. , 2013, Current opinion in cell biology.

[46]  S. Bicciato,et al.  Comparison of computational methods for Hi-C data analysis , 2017, Nature Methods.

[47]  N. Cox,et al.  Obesity-associated variants within FTO form long-range functional connections with IRX3 , 2014, Nature.

[48]  Helen E. Parkinson,et al.  The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog) , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[49]  L. Mirny,et al.  Formation of Chromosoma l Domains by Loop Extrusion Graphical , 2016 .

[50]  B. Ren,et al.  The 3D genome in transcriptional regulation and pluripotency. , 2014, Cell stem cell.

[51]  C. Semple,et al.  When TADs go bad: chromatin structure and nuclear organisation in human disease , 2017, F1000Research.

[52]  Philip A. Ewels,et al.  Mapping long-range promoter contacts in human cells with high-resolution capture Hi-C , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[53]  Aiqing He,et al.  Genetic Regulation of Adipose Gene Expression and Cardio-Metabolic Traits. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.

[54]  Jie Huang,et al.  Discovery and refinement of genetic loci associated with cardiometabolic risk using dense imputation maps , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[55]  T. Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[56]  Josh Lawrimore,et al.  Enrichment of dynamic chromosomal crosslinks drive phase separation of the nucleolus , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[57]  C. Glass,et al.  The coregulator exchange in transcriptional functions of nuclear receptors. , 2000, Genes & development.

[58]  A. Visel,et al.  Disruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions , 2015, Cell.

[59]  Erik Splinter,et al.  Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locus. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[60]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes , 2015, Nature.

[61]  HUGIn: Hi-C Unifying Genomic Interrogator , 2017 .

[62]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Enhancer connectome in primary human cells identifies target genes of disease-associated DNA elements , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[63]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[64]  Jing Liang,et al.  Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation , 2015, Nature.

[65]  Anthony D. Schmitt,et al.  Genome-wide mapping and analysis of chromosome architecture , 2016, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[66]  James E. DiCarlo,et al.  RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9 , 2013, Science.

[67]  Giacomo Cavalli,et al.  Organization and function of the 3D genome , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[68]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  GenomeDISCO: A concordance score for chromosome conformation capture experiments using random walks on contact map graphs , 2017 .

[69]  Neva C. Durand,et al.  Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  L. Di,et al.  Active Chromatin Hub of the Mouse α-Globin Locus Forms in a Transcription Factory of Clustered Housekeeping Genes , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.