Analysis of the interaction between the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT and its substrates actin and tubulin.

Two mechanisms have thus far been characterized for the assistance by chaperonins of the folding of other proteins. The first and best described is that of the prokaryotic chaperonin GroEL, which interacts with a large spectrum of proteins. GroEL uses a nonspecific mechanism by which any conformation of practically any unfolded polypeptide interacts with it through exposed, hydrophobic residues. ATP binding liberates the substrate in the GroEL cavity where it is given a chance to fold. A second mechanism has been described for the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT, which interacts mainly with the cytoskeletal proteins actin and tubulin. Cryoelectron microscopy and biochemical studies have revealed that both of these proteins interact with CCT in quasi-native, defined conformations. Here we have performed a detailed study of the docking of the actin and tubulin molecules extracted from their corresponding CCT:substrate complexes obtained from cryoelectron microscopy and image processing to localize certain regions in actin and tubulin that are involved in the interaction with CCT. These regions of actin and tubulin, which are not present in their prokaryotic counterparts FtsA and FtsZ, are involved in the polymerization of the two cytoskeletal proteins. These findings suggest coevolution of CCT with actin and tubulin in order to counteract the folding problems associated with the generation in these two cytoskeletal protein families of new domains involved in their polymerization.

[1]  K. Willison,et al.  Mutational screen identifies critical amino acid residues of beta-actin mediating interaction between its folding intermediates and eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonin CCT. , 2001, Journal of structural biology.

[2]  H. Saibil,et al.  Domain rotations between open, closed and bullet-shaped forms of the thermosome, an archaeal chaperonin. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  J. Carrascosa,et al.  Reversible interaction of beta-actin along the channel of the TCP-1 cytoplasmic chaperonin. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[4]  The chaperonin containing t-complex polypeptide 1 (TCP-1). Multisubunit machinery assisting in protein folding and assembly in the eukaryotic cytosol. , 1995, European journal of biochemistry.

[5]  A Leith,et al.  SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[6]  Michael Radermacher,et al.  3D reconstruction of the ATP-bound form of CCT reveals the asymmetric folding conformation of a type II chaperonin , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[7]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Situs: A package for docking crystal structures into low-resolution maps from electron microscopy. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[8]  E. Bi,et al.  FtsZ ring structure associated with division in Escherichia coli , 1991, Nature.

[9]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[10]  E. Pugh,et al.  Double cones as a basis for a new type of polarization vision in vertebrates , 1991, Nature.

[11]  E. Nogales,et al.  High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule , 1999, Cell.

[12]  Julie Grantham,et al.  Eukaryotic type II chaperonin CCT interacts with actin through specific subunits , 1999, Nature.

[13]  C. Dobson,et al.  MtGimC, a novel archaeal chaperone related to the eukaryotic chaperonin cofactor GimC/prefoldin , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[14]  S W Englander,et al.  Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding. , 1999, Science.

[15]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL , 1999, Nature.

[16]  W. Tap,et al.  Quasi-native Chaperonin-bound Intermediates in Facilitated Protein Folding (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  N. Cowan,et al.  Facilitated folding of actins and tubulins occurs via a nucleotide-dependent interaction between cytoplasmic chaperonin and distinctive folding intermediates , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[18]  Andrzej Joachimiak,et al.  THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF THE BACTERIAL CHAPERONIN GROEL AT 2.8 ANGSTROMS , 1995 .

[19]  Robert Huber,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Thermosome, the Archaeal Chaperonin and Homolog of CCT , 1998, Cell.

[20]  J Vandekerckhove,et al.  Eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonin contains t-complex polypeptide 1 and seven related subunits. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  K. Willison,et al.  Elucidation of the subunit orientation in CCT (chaperonin containing TCP1) from the subunit composition of CCT micro‐complexes , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[22]  A. Fersht,et al.  A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  X. Chen,et al.  Two yeast genes with similarity to TCP-1 are required for microtubule and actin function in vivo. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  W. Baumeister,et al.  Conformational rearrangements of an archaeal chaperonin upon ATPase cycling , 2000, Current Biology.

[25]  P. Sigler,et al.  The Crystal Structure of a GroEL/Peptide Complex Plasticity as a Basis for Substrate Diversity , 1999, Cell.

[26]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Atomic structure of the actin: DNase I complex , 1990, Nature.

[27]  Partial Occlusion of Both Cavities of the Eukaryotic Chaperonin with Antibody Has No Effect upon the Rates of β-Actin or α-Tubulin Folding* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  J. Weissman,et al.  Mechanism of GroEL action: Productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under groes , 1995, Cell.

[29]  D. Drubin,et al.  A yeast TCP-1-like protein is required for actin function in vivo. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  W. Baumeister,et al.  Structure of the Substrate Binding Domain of the Thermosome, an Archaeal Group II Chaperonin , 1997, Cell.

[31]  L. Amos,et al.  Tubulin‐like protofilaments in Ca2+‐induced FtsZ sheets , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[32]  K. Furtak,et al.  Multivalent Binding of Nonnative Substrate Proteins by the Chaperonin GroEL , 2000, Cell.

[33]  A. Joachimiak,et al.  Three conformations of an archaeal chaperonin, TF55 from Sulfolobus shibatae. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  Jan Löwe,et al.  Crystal structure of the cell division protein FtsA from Thermotoga maritima , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[35]  R. Ellis Chaperonins: Introductory Perspective , 1996 .

[36]  J Martín-Benito,et al.  Eukaryotic chaperonin CCT stabilizes actin and tubulin folding intermediates in open quasi‐native conformations , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[37]  E. Nogales Structural insights into microtubule function. , 2000, Annual review of biochemistry.

[38]  F. Hartl,et al.  Protein folding: Versatility of the cytosolic chaperonin TRiC/CCT , 2000, Current Biology.

[39]  G. Farr,et al.  Evidence that beta-tubulin induces a conformation change in the cytosolic chaperonin which stabilizes binding: implications for the mechanism of action. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[40]  K. Willison,et al.  Partial occlusion of both cavities of the eukaryotic chaperonin with antibody has no effect upon the rates of beta-actin or alpha-tubulin folding. , 2000, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[41]  K. Willison,et al.  Individual Subunits of the Eukaryotic Cytosolic Chaperonin Mediate Interactions with Binding Sites Located on Subdomains of β-Actin* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Identification of six Tcp-1-related genes encoding divergent subunits of the TCP-1-containing chaperonin , 1994, Current Biology.

[43]  J M Carazo,et al.  3D reconstruction in electron microscopy using ART with smooth spherically symmetric volume elements (blobs). , 1998, Ultramicroscopy.

[44]  E. Bi,et al.  FtsZ ring formation in fts mutants , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[45]  J. Vandekerckhove,et al.  The cytosolic class II chaperonin CCT recognizes delineated hydrophobic sequences in its target proteins. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[46]  C. Sander,et al.  Database of homology‐derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment , 1991, Proteins.

[47]  H. Erickson The FtsZ protofilament and attachment of ZipA--structural constraints on the FtsZ power stroke. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[48]  W. Baumeister,et al.  Group II chaperonins: new TRiC(k)s and turns of a protein folding machine. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[49]  J. Deisenhofer,et al.  The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution , 1996, Nature.

[50]  K. Willison,et al.  Defining the eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonin-binding sites in human tubulins. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  E. Nogales,et al.  Tubulin and FtsZ form a distinct family of GTPases , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[52]  J. Carrascosa,et al.  Conformational changes in the GroEL oligomer during the functional cycle. , 1997, Journal of structural biology.

[53]  Wolfgang Baumeister,et al.  Group II chaperonin in an open conformation examined by electron tomography , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[54]  N. Cowan,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated folding of vertebrate actin-related protein and gamma-tubulin , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[55]  Helen R Saibil,et al.  The Chaperonin ATPase Cycle: Mechanism of Allosteric Switching and Movements of Substrate-Binding Domains in GroEL , 1996, Cell.

[56]  C Sander,et al.  Mapping the Protein Universe , 1996, Science.

[57]  K. Willison,et al.  Point mutations in a hinge linking the small and large domains of beta-actin result in trapped folding intermediates bound to cytosolic chaperonin CCT. , 2001, Journal of structural biology.

[58]  L. Szekely,et al.  Epstein-Barr virus-encoded nuclear protein EBNA-3 interacts with the epsilon-subunit of the T-complex protein 1 chaperonin complex. , 1999, Journal of human virology.

[59]  A. Horwich,et al.  The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex , 1997, Nature.

[60]  Kenneth H. Downing,et al.  Structure of the αβ tubulin dimer by electron crystallography , 1998, Nature.

[61]  R. Doolittle The origins and evolution of eukaryotic proteins. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[62]  K. Willison,et al.  Cystosolic chaperonin subunits have a conserved ATPase domain but diverged polypeptide-binding domains. , 1994, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[63]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[64]  The chaperonin containing t-complex polypeptide 1 (TCP-1). Multisubunit machinery assisting in protein folding and assembly in the eukaryotic cytosol. , 1995 .

[65]  W. Tap,et al.  Specificity in chaperonin-mediated protein folding , 1995, Nature.

[66]  H. Saibil,et al.  Molecular chaperones and folding catalysts , 1999 .

[67]  L. Amos,et al.  Crystal structure of the bacterial cell-division protein FtsZ , 1998, Nature.

[68]  W. Welch,et al.  Prefoldin–Nascent Chain Complexes in the Folding of Cytoskeletal Proteins , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[69]  F. Hartl,et al.  Principles of protein folding in the cellular environment. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[70]  Y. Kashi,et al.  Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release , 1994, Nature.

[71]  J. Vandekerckhove,et al.  Prefoldin, a Chaperone that Delivers Unfolded Proteins to Cytosolic Chaperonin , 1998, Cell.

[72]  W. Doolittle,et al.  Origin and evolution of eukaryotic chaperonins: phylogenetic evidence for ancient duplications in CCT genes. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[73]  Bernd Bukau,et al.  The Hsp70 and Hsp60 Chaperone Machines , 1998, Cell.

[74]  G. Farr,et al.  Newly-synthesized beta-tubulin demonstrates domain-specific interactions with the cytosolic chaperonin. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[75]  A. Horwich,et al.  The Hsp 70 and Hsp 60 Review Chaperone Machines , 1998 .

[76]  B. Barrell,et al.  Primary structure and function of a second essential member of the heterooligomeric TCP1 chaperonin complex of yeast, TCP1 beta. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[77]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Atomic model of the actin filament , 1990, Nature.