Modeling a domain ontology for cultural heritage resources: A user-centered approach

The use of primary source materials is recognized as key to supporting history and social studies education. The extensive digitization of library, museum, and other cultural heritage collections represents an important teaching resource. Yet, searching and selecting digital primary sources appropriate for classroom use can be difficult and time-consuming. This study investigates the design requirements and the potential usefulness of a domain-specific ontology to facilitate access to, and use of, a collection of digital primary source materials developed by the Library of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. During a three-phase study, an ontology model was designed and evaluated with the involvement of social studies teachers. The findings revealed that the design of the ontology was appropriate to support the information needs of the teachers and was perceived as a potentially useful tool to enhance collection access. The primary contribution of this study is the introduction of an approach to ontology development that is user-centered and designed to facilitate access to digital cultural heritage materials. Such an approach should be considered on a case-by-case basis in relation to the size of the ontology being built, the nature of the knowledge domain, and the type of end users targeted. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Vladan Devedzic,et al.  Understanding ontological engineering , 2002, CACM.

[2]  Tony Gill,et al.  Building semantic bridges between museums, libraries and archives: The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model , 2004, First Monday.

[3]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[4]  Barbara P. Buttenfield,et al.  Colliding with the Real World: Heresies and Unexplored Questions about Audience, Economics, and Control of Digital Libraries , 2003 .

[5]  Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran,et al.  The Ontology of Tasks and Methods , 1997 .

[6]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  Identifying Barriers to Effective Subject Access in Library Catalogs , 1991 .

[7]  Douglas Herrmann,et al.  A Taxonomy of Part-Whole Relations , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Stuart James,et al.  Introduction to Vocabularies: Enhancing Access to Cultural Heritage Information , 2000 .

[9]  Karel Vredenburg,et al.  The state of user-centered design practice , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[10]  Jean Charlet,et al.  Methodological Principles for Structuring an "Ontology , 1995 .

[11]  Hur-Li Lee,et al.  Hierarchical navigation : An exploration of Yahoo! Directories , 2005 .

[12]  Carole D. Hafner,et al.  The State of the Art in Ontology Design: A Survey and Comparative Review , 1997, AI Mag..

[13]  Maria Cristina Pattuelli,et al.  Identity matters: Constructing social identities through ontology-based metadata , 2006, Dublin Core Conference.

[14]  Sarah L. Shreeves,et al.  Experiences of Educators Using a Portal of Aggregated Metadata , 2004, J. Digit. Inf..

[15]  Charles Reagan Wilson,et al.  Encyclopedia of Southern Culture , 1990 .

[16]  Birger Hjørland Semantics and Knowledge Organization. Presentation given in Riga, October 2006 , 2006 .

[17]  Eva Navas,et al.  Cultural Heritage and the Semantic Web , 2004, ESWS.

[18]  Riichiro Mizoguchi Tutorial on ontological engineering , 2009, New Generation Computing.

[19]  David Ellis,et al.  Ranganathan and the Net: using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web , 1999, Aslib Proc..

[20]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  A short study on the success of the Gene Ontology , 2004, J. Web Semant..

[21]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[22]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Knitting the Semantic Web , 2007 .

[23]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  Data Driven Ontology Evaluation , 2004, LREC.

[24]  Arne Sølvberg,et al.  Understanding quality in conceptual modeling , 1994, IEEE Software.

[25]  Carole D. Hafner,et al.  The State of the Art in Ontology Design: A Comparative Review , 1997 .

[26]  D. Grant Campbell,et al.  The ontological perspectives of the semantic Web and the Metadata Harvesting Protocol: Applications of metadata for improving Web search , 2001 .

[27]  Karen S. Fischer Critical Views of LCSH, 1990–2001: The Third Bibliographic Essay , 2005 .

[28]  Michael Gruninger,et al.  Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies , 1995, IJCAI 1995.

[29]  Fernandez Lopez,et al.  Overview Of Methodologies For Building Ontologies , 1999, IJCAI 1999.

[30]  Karen H. Calhoun,et al.  The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools: final report , 2006 .

[31]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Semantics and knowledge organization , 2007, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[32]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research: Implications for the design of digital libraries: Research Articles , 2005 .

[33]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  Making usable, useful, productivity-enhancing computer applications , 1991, CACM.

[34]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies: principles, methods and applications , 1996, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[35]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2003, Inf. Res..

[36]  Myke Gluck,et al.  Usability of Geospatial Metadata or Space‐Time Matters , 2005 .

[37]  York Sure,et al.  Semantic Web technologies for digital libraries , 2005 .

[38]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  The Role of Competency Questions in Enterprise Engineering , 1995 .

[39]  Diane I. Hillmann,et al.  Resource Description and Access (RDA) , 2009 .

[40]  Ola Halldén Teaching and Learning in History , 1994 .

[41]  Paul Mulholland,et al.  CIPHER: Enabling Communities of Interest to Promote Heritage of European Regions , 2002 .

[42]  C. Maria Keet Introduction to part-whole relations : mereology , conceptual modelling and mathematical aspects ? , 2006 .

[43]  Howard Beck,et al.  Overview of Approach, Methodologies, Standards, and Tools for Ontologies , 2002 .

[44]  Karen S Calhoun,et al.  The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its Integration with Other Discovery Tools: Draft 2B , 2006 .

[45]  Mike Uschold,et al.  Building Ontologies: Towards a Unified Methodology , 1996 .

[46]  Mary Konkel On the Road... In the Field: Response to the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control , 2008 .

[47]  Elena Paslaru Bontas,et al.  Ontology Engineering Cost Estimation with ONTOCOM , 2006 .

[48]  Martin Hepp,et al.  Possible Ontologies: How Reality Constrains the Development of Relevant Ontologies , 2007, IEEE Internet Computing.

[49]  Mimi Recker,et al.  Understanding educator perceptions of "quality" in digital libraries , 2003, 2003 Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 2003. Proceedings..

[50]  M. S. Sridhar,et al.  Subject searching in the OPAC of a special library: problems and issues , 2004, OCLC Syst. Serv..

[51]  Wolfgang Nejdl,et al.  Advances of the Semantic Web for e-learning: expanding learning frontiers , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[52]  Richard T. Gill,et al.  Conceptual Graph Analysis: Knowledge Acquisition for Instructional System Design , 1993 .

[53]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data, Rev. ed. , 1993 .

[54]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[55]  Stephen L. Hupp,et al.  Historical Statistics of the United States , 1997 .

[56]  N. F. Noy,et al.  Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology , 2001 .

[57]  Mimi Recker,et al.  Discovery and Use of Online Learning Resources: Case Study Findings , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[58]  H. Sofia Pinto,et al.  Ontologies: How can They be Built? , 2004, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[59]  Donald O. Schneider,et al.  Expectations of Excellence: Curriculum Standards for Social Studies. Bulletin 89. , 1994 .

[60]  Eero Hyvönen,et al.  Semantic Portals for Cultural Heritage , 2009, Handbook on Ontologies.

[61]  Giancarlo Guizzardi,et al.  Representing and reasoning over a taxonomy of part-whole relations , 2008, Appl. Ontology.

[62]  Karen Coyle,et al.  Resource Description and Access (RDA): Cataloging Rules for the 20th Century , 2007 .

[63]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean , 2002, CACM.

[64]  Ray R. Larson,et al.  The decline of subject searching: Long-term trends and patterns of index use in an online catalog , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[65]  Allen Newell,et al.  The Knowledge Level , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[66]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[67]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Ontological Engineering: With Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web , 2004, Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing.

[68]  Sebastian Ryszard Kruk,et al.  Semantic Digital Libraries , 2009, Semantic Digital Libraries.

[69]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Scenarios and design cognition , 2002, Proceedings IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering.

[70]  W Ceusters,et al.  A Terminological and Ontological Analysis of the NCI Thesaurus , 2005, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[71]  Patricia Harpring,et al.  Cataloging Cultural Objects: A Guide to Describing Cultural Works and Their Images , 2006 .

[72]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  METHONTOLOGY: From Ontological Art Towards Ontological Engineering , 1997, AAAI 1997.

[73]  Jody DeRidder The Immediate Prospects for the Application of Ontologies in Digital Libraries , 2007 .

[74]  Christoph Tempich,et al.  Ontology Engineering: A Reality Check , 2006, OTM Conferences.

[75]  R. Hamilton,et al.  Internet Recruitment and E-Mail Interviews in Qualitative Studies , 2006, Qualitative health research.

[76]  Zahir Tari,et al.  On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2018 Conferences , 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[77]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  A collaborative approach to ontology design , 2002, CACM.

[78]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research: Implications for the design of digital libraries , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[79]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies: Where is their meeting point? , 2003, Data Knowl. Eng..

[80]  Schubert Foo,et al.  Ontology research and development. Part 1 - a review of ontology generation , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[81]  Barbara H. Kwasnik,et al.  The Role of Classification in Knowledge Representation and Discovery , 1999, Libr. Trends.

[82]  Sharon Oster A Review of the Definition and Measurement of Poverty: Volume I, Summary Review Paper; Volume II, Annotated Bibliography. The Measure of Poverty, Technical Paper III. , 1976 .

[83]  Eero Hyvönen,et al.  Creating and Using Geospatial Ontology Time Series in a Semantic Cultural Heritage Portal , 2008, ESWC.

[84]  Achille C. Varzi,et al.  Holes and Other Superficialities , 1994 .

[85]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[86]  Janice G. Schuster,et al.  Historical Statistics of the United States, Millennial Edition , 2007 .

[87]  Nicola Guarino UNDERSTANDING, BUILDING, AND USING ONTOLOGIES , 1997 .

[88]  Richard Deswarte,et al.  Applying the Semantic Web: The VICODI Experience in Creating Visual Contextualization for History , 2005, Lit. Linguistic Comput..