Designing for Complexity: Using Divisions and Hierarchy to Manage Complex Tasks

This paper studies the impact of task complexity and decomposability on the degree of organizational divisionalization and hierarchy within firms. Drawing upon the team theory and modularity literature, it argues that the degree of divisionalization is predicated not only on the extent of interdependence complexity among tasks but also on the extent to which those interdependent relationships are decomposable. As such, the feasibility and benefits of modularization in organizational design may be overstated when the underlying tasks are not decomposable. In addition, this paper argues that organizational hierarchy serves to mitigate the tension between complexity and decomposability by facilitating a higher degree of divisionalization. These arguments are tested using data on the business activities and organization structures of U.S. equipment manufacturers in 1993-2003. Results show that divisionalization increases with task complexity, suggesting that complex task systems encourage more division of managerial responsibilities. However, divisionalization decreases as task systems become less decomposable. Meanwhile, organizational hierarchy increases with task complexity, and it increases as task systems become less decomposable. These findings highlight the constraints firms face in designing modular organization structures and the role of hierarchy in coordinating complex task systems that are not fully decomposable.

[1]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[3]  Alfred Dupont Chandler,et al.  战略与结构 : 美国工商企业成长的若干篇章=strategy and structure : chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise , 1962 .

[4]  A. Zellner An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias , 1962 .

[5]  Zenon S. Zannetos,et al.  On the theory of divisional structures: some aspects of centralization and decentralization of contr , 1965 .

[6]  O. Williamson Hierarchical Control and Optimum Firm Size , 1967, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[8]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[9]  Donald Ervin Knuth,et al.  The Art of Computer Programming , 1968 .

[10]  P. Blau A FORMAL THEORY OF DIFFERENTIATION IN ORGANIZATIONS , 1970 .

[11]  J. Child,et al.  Technology, Size, and Organization Structure , 1972 .

[12]  D. L. Parnas,et al.  On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules , 1972, Software Pioneers.

[13]  R. Radner,et al.  Economic theory of teams , 1972 .

[14]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[15]  K. Arrow The limits of organization , 1974 .

[16]  R. Rumelt Strategy, structure, and economic performance , 1974 .

[17]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[18]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[19]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design , 1977 .

[20]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Strategy implementation : the role of structure and process , 1978 .

[21]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[22]  R Dewar,et al.  Size, technology, complexity, and structural differentiation: toward a theoretical synthesis. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[23]  Howard E. Aldrich Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[24]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[25]  R. Burton,et al.  A Computer Simulation Test of the M-Form Hypothesis , 1980 .

[26]  John W. Sutherland,et al.  A Quasi-Empirical Mapping of Optimal Scale of Enterprise , 1980 .

[27]  Peter H. Grinyer,et al.  Strategy, Structure, the Environment, and Financial Performance in 48 United Kingdom Companies , 1980 .

[28]  R. Rumelt,et al.  Diversification strategy and profitability , 1982 .

[29]  A. Lemelin,et al.  Relatedness in the Patterns of Interindustry Diversification , 1982 .

[30]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[31]  Daniel J. Brass Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[32]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change , 1984 .

[33]  N. Fligstein,et al.  The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979 , 1985 .

[34]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[35]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Multidivisional Structure and Performance: The Contingency of Diversification Strategy , 1987 .

[36]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Internal differentiation within multinational corporations , 1989 .

[37]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[38]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[39]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[40]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  A theory of hierarchies based on limited managerial attention , 1991 .

[41]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing New Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality (Революция в разработке продуктов: количественный скачок в скорости, эффективности и качестве) , 1992 .

[42]  Johannes M. Pennings,et al.  Structural contingency theory: A re-appraisal , 1992 .

[43]  D. Dougherty Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[44]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[45]  R. Radner The organization of decentralized information processing , 1993 .

[46]  John G. Matsusaka,et al.  Takeover Motives During the Conglomerate Merger Wave , 1993 .

[47]  James G. March,et al.  A primer on decision making : how decisions happen , 1994 .

[48]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[49]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface , 1995 .

[50]  Nicholas Argyres,et al.  Technology strategy, governance structure and interdivisional coordination , 1995 .

[51]  Ruth Milkman,et al.  Microsoft Secrets: How the World's Most Powerful Software Company Creates Technology, Shapes Markets, and Manages People , 1995 .

[52]  J. Robins,et al.  A resource‐based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance , 1995 .

[53]  Kirk Monteverde Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry , 1995 .

[54]  Arantxa Etxeverria The Origins of Order , 1993 .

[55]  Geoffrey Rothwell,et al.  Organizational Structure and Expected Output at Nuclear Power Plants , 1996 .

[56]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[57]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[58]  Sea Jin Chang,et al.  AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE ON DIVERSIFICATION AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING: ENTRY, EXIT, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE DURING 1981–89 , 1996 .

[59]  Nicholas Argyres CAPABILITIES, TECHNOLOGICAL DIVERSIFICATION AND DIVISIONALIZATION , 1996 .

[60]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  The disaggregation of corporations: Selective intervention, high powered incentives and molecular units , 1997 .

[61]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[62]  Timothy Van Zandt,et al.  Real-Time Hierarchical Resource Allocation , 1997 .

[63]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Competing By Design , 1997 .

[64]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Competing by design: the power of organizational architecture , 1998 .

[65]  Moshe Farjoun,et al.  The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness in diversification , 1998 .

[66]  Rick Yan SHORT-TERM RESULTS: THE LITMUS TEST FOR SUCCESS IN CHINA , 1998 .

[67]  Luigi Zingales,et al.  The Firm as a Dedicated Hierarchy: A Theory of the Origin and Growth of Firms , 1998 .

[68]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Volume 1 , 1999 .

[69]  M. Mazumdar,et al.  Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes , 1999 .

[70]  Joseph P. H. Fan,et al.  The Measurement of Relatedness: An Application to Corporate Diversification , 2000 .

[71]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[72]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  When business is a confidence game. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[73]  Nile W. Hatch,et al.  Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2001 .

[74]  L. Donaldson The Contingency Theory of Organizations , 2001 .

[75]  Timothy J. Sturgeon,et al.  Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization , 2002 .

[76]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[77]  Milton Harris,et al.  Organization Design , 2000, Manag. Sci..

[78]  R. Langlois Modularity in technology and organization , 2002 .

[79]  Antoinette Schoar,et al.  Effects of Corporate Diversification on Productivity , 2002 .

[80]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[81]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  Division of labor, organizational coordination and market mechanisms in collective problem-solving , 2005 .

[82]  Douglas J. Miller,et al.  An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm , 2003 .

[83]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Bounded Rationality and the Search for Organizational Architecture: An Evolutionary Perspective on the Design of Organizations and Their Evolvability , 2004 .

[84]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[85]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[86]  Belen Villalonga,et al.  Diversification Discount or Premium? New Evidence from the Business Information Tracking Series , 2004 .

[87]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[88]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  Identity and the Economics of Organizations , 2005 .

[89]  Leon Danon,et al.  Comparing community structure identification , 2005, cond-mat/0505245.

[90]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks , 2005, Nature.

[91]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Organizing to Strategize in the Face of Interactions: Preventing Premature Lock-in , 2006 .

[92]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Between "Knowledge" and "the Economy": Notes on the Scientific Study of Designs , 2006 .

[93]  Julie Wulf,et al.  The Flattening Firm: Evidence from Panel Data on the Changing Nature of Corporate Hierarchies , 2003, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[94]  Arie Y. Lewin,et al.  Interdependency, Competition, and the Distribution of Firm and Industry Profits , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[95]  W. Scott,et al.  Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives , 2006 .

[96]  G. Hoetker Do Modular Products Lead to Modular Organizations , 2006 .

[97]  Jacques Crémer,et al.  Language and the Theory of the Firm , 2007 .

[98]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  WHEN EXPLORATION BACKFIRES: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF MULTILEVEL ORGANIZATIONAL SEARCH , 2006 .

[99]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Organizations and Markets , 2009 .

[100]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Modularity, Transactions, and the Boundaries of Firms: A Synthesis , 2007 .

[101]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implications for Exploration , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[102]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms , 2007 .

[103]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  In Search of the Biological Significance of Modular Structures in Protein Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[104]  Sai Yayavaram,et al.  Decomposability in Knowledge Structures and Its Impact on the Usefulness of Inventions and Knowledge-base Malleability , 2008 .

[105]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The Dual Role of Modularity: Innovation and Imitation , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[106]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Choice Interactions and Business Strategy , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[107]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  A Big World Inside Small-World Networks , 2009, PloS one.

[108]  Ali Hortaçsu,et al.  Why do Firms Own Production Chains? , 2009 .

[109]  Nicholas Argyres,et al.  Innovation, Modularity, and Vertical Deintegration: Evidence from the Early U.S. Auto Industry , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[110]  Yue Maggie Zhou Synergy, Coordination Costs and Diversification Choices , 2010 .

[111]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  What is Strategy , 2012 .

[112]  M. Lavoie,et al.  Theory of the firm , 2014 .