Growth of Paramecium bursaria as Influenced by the Presence of Algal Symbionts

SYMBIOTIC associations are widely distributed throughout the plant and animal kingdoms (Caullery, 1950; Buchner, 1953; Fuller, 1958), but to date relatively little is known about the detailed nature of the interactions between symbiotic partners. It is apparent, however, that symbiotic complexes frequently possess properties, not characteristic of either partner alone, that may at least partially free the co-operating organisms from competition with related free-living forms. The hereditary endosymbiotic complex of Paramecium bursaria-Chlorella sp. affords exceptionally favorable material for extending our knowledge of hostsymbiont relationships to a physiological and biochemical level. A single paramecium normally harbors several hundred algae that are transmitted to both daughter cells at division and retained during conjugation. Since the two organisms may be dissociated, cultured separately, and reassociated in the original or novel combinations (Pringsheim, 1928; Siegel and Karakashian, 1959; Siegel, 1960), their metabolism may be investigated singly as well as in symbiotic association. Moreover, the fact that P. bursaria, syngen 1, has been studied genetically (Jennings and Opitz, 1944; Siegel and Larison, 1960) suggests that genetic analyses of infection specificity are feasible. In order to exploit the ParameciumChlorella system for biochemical and genetic analysis, it is necessary to know the behavior of specific strains in a controlled environment. Unfortunately, previous workers (Le Dantec, 1892; Oehler, 1922; Pringsheim, 1928) did not quantify their observations nor were they able to verify their findings in the absence of for-

[1]  J. Lederberg Cell genetics and hereditary symbiosis. , 1952, Physiological reviews.

[2]  P. Buchner Endosymbiose der tiere mit pflanzlichen mikroorganismen , 1953 .

[3]  L. Muscatine,et al.  DIRECT EVIDENCE FOR THE TRANSFER OF MATERIALS FROM SYMBIOTIC ALGAE TO THE TISSUES OF A COELENTERATE. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  J. B. Loefer Bacteria-free culture of Paramecium bursaria and concentration of the medium as a factor in growth , 1936 .

[5]  R. W. Siegel,et al.  THE GENIC CONTROL OF MATING TYPES IN PARAMECIUM BURSARIA. , 1960, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  T. M. Sonneborn Methods in the general biology and genetics of paramecium aurelia , 1950 .

[7]  H. Jennings,et al.  Genetics of Paramecium Bursaria. IV. a Fourth Variety from Russia. Lethal Crosses with an American Variety. , 1944, Genetics.

[8]  J. Preer,et al.  Cytological observations on the cytoplasmic factor "kappa" in Paramecium aurelia. , 1953, Experimental cell research.

[9]  Harold C. Bold,et al.  The Morphology of Chlamydomonas chlamydogama, Sp. Nov. , 1949 .

[10]  G. Beale,et al.  Structure of the mate-killer (mu) particles in Paramecium aurelia, stock 540. , 1960, Journal of general microbiology.

[11]  T. M. Sonneborn Kappa and Related Particles in Paramecium1 , 1959 .

[12]  C. Hood THE ZOÖCHLORELLÆ OF FRONTONIA LEUCAS , 1927 .

[13]  E. Altenburg The "Viroid" Theory in Relation to Plasmagenes, Viruses, Cancer and Plastids , 1946, The American Naturalist.

[14]  R. W. Siegel Hereditary endosymbiosis in Paramecium bursaria. , 1960, Experimental cell research.