Viability of 3h grown bacterial micro-colonies after direct Raman identification.

Clinical diagnostics in routine microbiology still mostly relies on bacterial growth, a time-consuming process that prevents test results to be used directly as key decision-making elements for therapeutic decisions. There is some evidence that Raman micro-spectroscopy provides clinically relevant information from a limited amount of bacterial cells, thus holding the promise of reduced growth times and accelerated result delivery. Indeed, bacterial identification at the species level directly from micro-colonies at an early time of growth (6h) directly on their growth medium has been demonstrated. However, such analysis is suspected to be partly destructive and could prevent the further growth of the colony needed for other tests, e.g. antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). In the present study, we evaluated the effect of the powerful laser excitation used for Raman identification on micro-colonies probed after very short growth times. We show here, using envelope integrity markers (Syto 9 and Propidium Iodide) directly on ultra-small micro-colonies of a few tens of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus epidermidis cells (3h growth time), that only the cells that are directly impacted by the laser lose their membrane integrity. Growth kinetics experiments show that the non-probed surrounding cells are sometimes also affected but that the micro-colonies keep their ability to grow, resulting in normal aspect and size of colonies after 15h of growth. Thus, Raman spectroscopy could be used for very early (<3h) identification of grown micro-organisms without impairing further antibiotics susceptibility characterization steps.

[1]  K. Schuster,et al.  Single-cell analysis of bacteria by Raman microscopy: spectral information on the chemical composition of cells and on the heterogeneity in a culture. , 2000, Journal of microbiological methods.

[2]  P. Lebaron,et al.  Use of fluorescent probes to assess physiological functions of bacteria at single-cell level. , 2000, Microbes and infection.

[3]  Siamak Dadras,et al.  Different Photoresponses of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to 514, 532, and 633 nm Low Level Lasers In Vitro , 2006, Current Microbiology.

[4]  Olivier Gal,et al.  Direct identification of clinically relevant bacterial and yeast microcolonies and macrocolonies on solid culture media by Raman spectroscopy , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  M. Pommepuy,et al.  Visible light damage to Escherichia coli in seawater: oxidative stress hypothesis. , 1994, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[6]  Z. Zalevsky,et al.  Direct laser light enhancement of susceptibility of bacteria to gentamicin antibiotic , 2011 .

[7]  D. Naumann,et al.  Classification and Identification of Enterococci: a Comparative Phenotypic, Genotypic, and Vibrational Spectroscopic Study , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  S. Stocks Mechanism and use of the commercially available viability stain, BacLight , 2004, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[9]  H M Davey,et al.  Red but not dead? Membranes of stressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae are permeable to propidium iodide. , 2011, Environmental microbiology.

[10]  J. Popp,et al.  Vibrational spectroscopy—A powerful tool for the rapid identification of microbial cells at the single‐cell level , 2009, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[11]  D. Naumann,et al.  Prospective Study of the Performance of Vibrational Spectroscopies for Rapid Identification of Bacterial and Fungal Pathogens Recovered from Blood Cultures , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[12]  H. Bruining,et al.  Raman spectroscopic method for identification of clinically relevant microorganisms growing on solid culture medium. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  Osnat Feuerstein,et al.  Phototoxic Effect of Visible Light on Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum: An In Vitro Study¶,† , 2004, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[14]  P. Gemperline,et al.  Identification of single bacterial cells in aqueous solution using confocal laser tweezers Raman spectroscopy. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  Susann Müller,et al.  Viability states of bacteria—Specific mechanisms of selected probes , 2010, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[16]  Ota Samek,et al.  Raman spectroscopy for rapid discrimination of Staphylococcus epidermidis clones related to medical device-associated infections , 2008 .

[17]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[18]  H. Edwards,et al.  Fourier transform Raman spectroscopy of bacterial cell walls , 1994 .

[19]  B. Lendl,et al.  Multidimensional information on the chemical composition of single bacterial cells by confocal Raman microspectroscopy. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[20]  H. Hoffman,et al.  Synchrony of Division in Clonal Microcolonies of Escherichia coli , 1965, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  S. Günther,et al.  Limits of propidium iodide as a cell viability indicator for environmental bacteria , 2007, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[22]  Kees Maquelin,et al.  Rapid epidemiological analysis of Acinetobacter strains by Raman spectroscopy. , 2006, Journal of microbiological methods.

[23]  H. Bruining,et al.  Rapid Identification of Candida Species by Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.