Lexical stress encoding in single word production estimated by event-related brain potentials

An event-related brain potentials (ERPs) experiment was carried out to investigate the time course of lexical stress encoding in language production. Native speakers of Dutch viewed a series of pictures corresponding to bisyllabic names which were either stressed on the first or on the second syllable and made go/no-go decisions on the lexical stress location of those picture names. Behavioral results replicated a pattern that was observed earlier, i.e. faster button-press latencies to initial as compared to final stress targets. The electrophysiological results indicated that participants could make a lexical stress decision significantly earlier when picture names had initial than when they had final stress. Moreover, the present data suggest the time course of lexical stress encoding during single word form formation in language production. When word length is corrected for, the temporal interval for lexical stress encoding specified by the current ERP results falls into the time window previously identified for phonological encoding in language production.

[1]  N. Schiller,et al.  The influence of semantic category membership on syntactic decisions: A study using event-related brain potentials , 2006, Brain Research.

[2]  Marie T. Banich,et al.  Mind, Brain, and Language : Multidisciplinary Perspectives , 2003 .

[3]  W. Walter,et al.  Contingent Negative Variation : An Electric Sign of Sensori-Motor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain , 1964, Nature.

[4]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  A Comparison of Lexeme and Speech Syllables in Dutch , 1996, J. Quant. Linguistics.

[5]  M. Kutas,et al.  An Electrophysiological Analysis of the Time Course of Conceptual and Syntactic Encoding during Tacit Picture Naming , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Monitoring metrical stress in polysyllabic words , 2006 .

[7]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[9]  Gösta Bruce,et al.  8. Wordstress in West-Germanic and North-Germanic languages , 1999 .

[10]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Metrical structure in planning the production of spoken words , 1998 .

[11]  A. Nambu,et al.  No-go activity in the frontal association cortex of human subjects , 1993, Neuroscience Research.

[12]  Mart Bles,et al.  Tracking the time course of phonological encoding in speech production: an event-related brain potential study. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  A. Crompton,et al.  Syllables and segments in speech production , 1981 .

[14]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  A. Meyer.  The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable , 1991 .

[16]  Hisae Gemba,et al.  Potential related to no-go reaction of go/no-go hand movement task with color discrimination in human , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[18]  E. Formisano,et al.  Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: An fMRI study employing overt speech , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[20]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  The retrieval of phonological forms in production: tests of predictions from a connectionist model , 1988 .

[21]  Clara C Levelt,et al.  Stress priming in picture naming: An SOA study , 2004, Brain and Language.

[22]  A. Meyer.  The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word ☆ , 1990 .

[23]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities , 2003, Phonetica.

[24]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[25]  Jane L Morgan,et al.  Syllable Monitoring in Internally and Externally Generated English Words , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[26]  M. Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiological estimates of semantic and syntactic information access during tacit picture naming and listening to words , 2001, Neuroscience Research.

[27]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Effects of syllable frequency in speech production , 2006, Cognition.

[28]  M. Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during implicit picture naming. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Linda Wheeldon,et al.  Phoneme monitoring in internal and external speech , 2002 .

[30]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Syllabification in Speech Production: Evaluation of WEAVER , 1997 .

[31]  E. Jodo,et al.  Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[33]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Twenty-first century psycholinguistics : four cornerstones , 2005 .

[34]  W. Levelt,et al.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.

[35]  A. Caramazza.  How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[36]  J. Ford,et al.  ERPs to response production and inhibition. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  W. Levelt,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form , 1994 .

[38]  W. Levelt,et al.  Monitoring the Time Course of Phonological Encoding , 1995 .

[39]  Frank H. Guenther,et al.  Neural control of speech movements , 2002 .

[40]  Niels O. Schiller,et al.  Verbal self-monitoring , 2005 .

[41]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[42]  R. Kager.  A Metrical Theory of Stress and Destressing in English and Dutch , 1989 .

[43]  M Turennout,et al.  Brain activity during speaking: from syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. , 1998, Science.

[44]  T. Münte,et al.  The influence of semantic and phonological factors on syntactic decisions: an event-related brain potential study. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[45]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  The preparation of syllables in speech production , 2004 .

[46]  G. Booij.  The Phonology of Dutch , 1995 .

[47]  M. Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during listening and naming , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Articulatory Phonology: A phonology for public language use , 2003 .