Alignment to the Actions of a Robot

Alignment is a phenomenon observed in human conversation: Dialog partners’ behavior converges in many respects. Such alignment has been proposed to be automatic and the basis for communicating successfully. Recent research on human–computer dialog promotes a mediated communicative design account of alignment according to which the extent of alignment is influenced by interlocutors’ beliefs about each other. Our work aims at adding to these findings in two ways. (a) Our work investigates alignment of manual actions, instead of lexical choice. (b) Participants interact with the iCub humanoid robot, instead of an artificial computer dialog system. Our results confirm that alignment also takes place in the domain of actions. We were not able to replicate the results of the original study in general in this setting, but in accordance with its findings, participants with a high questionnaire score for emotional stability and participants who are familiar with robots align their actions more to a robot they believe to be basic than to one they believe to be advanced. Regarding alignment over the course of an interaction, the extent of alignment seems to remain constant, when participants believe the robot to be advanced, but it increases over time, when participants believe the robot to be a basic version.

[1]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  An Alignment-Capable Microplanner for Natural Language Generation , 2009, ENLG.

[2]  Jiang Hu,et al.  Adaptive language behavior in HCI: how expectations and beliefs about a system affect users' word choice , 2006, CHI.

[3]  Norihiro Hagita,et al.  Lexical entrainment in human-robot interaction: Can robots entrain human vocabulary? , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Beyond the Perception-Behavior Link: The Ubiquitous Utility and Motivational Moderators of Nonconscious Mimicry. , 2005 .

[5]  S. Garrod,et al.  Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination , 1987, Cognition.

[6]  O. John,et al.  Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German , 2007 .

[7]  Amanda Stent,et al.  Lexical and Syntactic Adaptation and Their Impact in Deployed Spoken Dialog Systems , 2009, NAACL.

[8]  Britta Wrede,et al.  A computational model of emotional alignment , 2011 .

[9]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Aquila: An open-source GPU-accelerated toolkit for cognitive and neuro-robotics research , 2011, The 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[12]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Aquila: An Open-Source GPU-Accelerated Toolkit for Cognitive Robotics Research , 2011 .

[13]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  The iCub humanoid robot: an open platform for research in embodied cognition , 2008, PerMIS.

[14]  Kerstin Fischer,et al.  Mindful tutors: Linguistic choice and action demonstration in speech to infants and a simulated robot , 2011 .

[15]  Gentiane Venture,et al.  The Familiar as a key-concept in regulating the social and affective dimensions of HRI , 2012, 2012 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2012).

[16]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Do beliefs about a robot's capabilities influence alignment to its actions? , 2013, 2013 IEEE Third Joint International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL).

[18]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Using Nonconscious Behavioral Mimicry to Create Affiliation and Rapport , 2003, Psychological science.

[19]  K. Rohlfing,et al.  People modify their tutoring behavior in robot-directed interaction for action learning , 2009, 2009 IEEE 8th International Conference on Development and Learning.

[20]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Gestural Alignment in Natural Dialogue , 2012, CogSci.

[21]  K. Rohlfing,et al.  Which “motionese” parameters change with children's age? Disentangling attention-getting from action-structuring modifications , 2022, Frontiers in Communication.

[22]  M. Pickering,et al.  The role of beliefs in lexical alignment: Evidence from dialogs with humans and computers , 2011, Cognition.

[23]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Prediction of Human Behavior in Human--Robot Interaction Using Psychological Scales for Anxiety and Negative Attitudes Toward Robots , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[24]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[25]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays : Evidence from written and spoken dialogue , 2008 .

[26]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Social resonance and embodied coordination in face-to-face conversation with artificial interlocutors , 2010, Speech Commun..

[27]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  Does Anthropomorphism Reduce Stress in HRI? , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[28]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980 .

[29]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Alignment as the Basis for Successful Communication , 2006 .

[30]  M. Pickering,et al.  Linguistic alignment between people and computers , 2010 .

[31]  Irene Kimbara.  On gestural mimicry , 2006 .

[32]  Joakim Gustafson,et al.  How do system questions influence lexical choices in user answers? , 1997, EUROSPEECH.

[33]  Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová,et al.  Children's adaptation in multi-session interaction with a humanoid robot , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[34]  Gentiane Venture,et al.  Social vs. Useful HRI: Experiencing the Familiar, Perceiving the Robot as a Sociable Partner and Responding to Its Actions , 2013, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[35]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Regulation and Entrainment in Human—Robot Interaction , 2000, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[36]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[37]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Concealing one's meaning from overhearers , 1987 .

[38]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[39]  R. Baaren,et al.  Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation , 2003 .