Randomized Clinical Trial of Lumbar Instrumented Fusion and Cognitive Intervention and Exercises in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Disc Degeneration

Study Design. Single blind randomized study. Objectives. To compare the effectiveness of lumbar instrumented fusion with cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Summary of Background Data. To the authors’ best knowledge, only one randomized study has evaluated the effectiveness of lumbar fusion. The Swedish Lumbar Spine Study reported that lumbar fusion was better than continuing physiotherapy and care by the family physician. Patients and Methods. Sixty-four patients aged 25–60 years with low back pain lasting longer than 1 year and evidence of disc degeneration at L4–L5 and/or L5–S1 at radiographic examination were randomized to either lumbar fusion with posterior transpedicular screws and postoperative physiotherapy, or cognitive intervention and exercises. The cognitive intervention consisted of a lecture to give the patient an understanding that ordinary physical activity would not harm the disc and a recommendation to use the back and bend it. This was reinforced by three daily physical exercise sessions for 3 weeks. The main outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index. Results. At the 1-year follow-up visit, 97% of the patients, including 6 patients who had either not attended treatment or changed groups, were examined. The Oswestry Disability Index was significantly reduced from 41 to 26 after surgery, compared with 42 to 30 after cognitive intervention and exercises. The mean difference between groups was 2.3 (−6.7 to 11.4) (P = 0.33). Improvements inback pain, use of analgesics, emotional distress, life satisfaction, and return to work were not different. Fear-avoidance beliefs and fingertip-floor distance were reduced more after nonoperative treatment, and lower limb pain was reduced more after surgery. The success rateaccording to an independent observer was 70% after surgery and 76% after cognitive intervention and exercises. The early complication rate in the surgical group was 18%. Conclusion. The main outcome measure showed equal improvement in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration randomized to cognitive intervention and exercises, or lumbar fusion.

[1]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[2]  J. Vlaeyen,et al.  Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art , 2000, Pain.

[3]  A. Indahl,et al.  Good Prognosis for Low Back Pain When Left Untampered: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 1995, Spine.

[4]  I. Holm,et al.  Measuring Self-Reported Functional Status and Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain by Postal Questionnaires: A Reliability Study , 2003, Spine.

[5]  D. Prolo,et al.  Toward Uniformity in Evaluating Results of Lumbar Spine Operations: A Paradigm Applied to Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions , 1986, Spine.

[6]  I. Holm,et al.  [Patients with chronic degenerative spinal disease--can conservative treatment reduce the waiting list for surgery?]. , 1999, Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening.

[7]  R. Deyo.  Acute low back pain: a new paradigm for management , 1996, BMJ.

[8]  R. Deyo,et al.  Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. , 1993, Spine.

[9]  J. Gibson,et al.  The Cochrane review of surgery for lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar spondylosis. , 1999, Spine.

[10]  Garry T. Allison,et al.  Evaluation of Specific Stabilizing Exercise in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain With Radiologic Diagnosis of Spondylolysis or Spondylolisthesis , 1997, Spine.

[11]  J. K. Webb,et al.  Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: A European view , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[12]  R. Deyo,et al.  An International Comparison of Back Surgery Rates , 1994, Spine.

[13]  E. Carragee,et al.  Activity restrictions after posterior lumbar discectomy. A prospective study of outcomes in 152 cases with no postoperative restrictions. , 1999, Spine.

[14]  E. Simmons,et al.  Interobserver variability in grading lumbar fusions. , 1997, Journal of spinal disorders.

[15]  J D Troup,et al.  Outline of a Fear-Avoidance Model of exaggerated pain perception--I. , 1983, Behaviour research and therapy.

[16]  J I Brevik,et al.  Arthroscopic surgery compared with supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome) , 1993, BMJ.

[17]  G. Waddell,et al.  A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability , 1993, Pain.

[18]  Anders Nordwall,et al.  Chronic Low Back Pain and Fusion: A Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Study From the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group , 2002, Spine.

[19]  E. Carragee,et al.  Provocative Discography in Patients After Limited Lumbar Discectomy: A Controlled, Randomized Study of Pain Response in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Subjects , 2000, Spine.

[20]  M. Laursen,et al.  Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement of Radiograph Interpretation With and Without Pedicle Screw Implants: The Need for a Detailed Classification System in Posterolateral Spinal Fusion , 2001, Spine.

[21]  D. Sackett,et al.  The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect , 1995, BMJ.

[22]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. , 2001, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[23]  O. Dalgard,et al.  The meaning and significance of caseness: the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview II , 1999, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[24]  A. Nordwall,et al.  2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar Fusion Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial From the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group , 2001, Spine.

[25]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Lumbar Fusion Results Related to Diagnosis , 1998, Spine.

[26]  J. Welsh,et al.  The rates of false-positive lumbar discography in select patients without low back symptoms. , 2000, Spine.

[27]  O. Dalgard,et al.  Prevalence, incidence and age at onset of psychiatric disorders in Norway , 1999, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[28]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Mobility, Strength, and Fitness After a Graded Activity Program for Patients with Subacute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Study with a Behavioral Therapy Approach , 1992, Spine.

[29]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  K Harms-Ringdahl,et al.  Ratings of Perceived Thigh and Back Exertion in Forest Workers During Repetitive Lifting Using Squat and Stoop Techniques , 1994, Spine.

[31]  A. Ljunggren,et al.  Arthroscopic surgery versus supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome): a prospective, randomized, controlled study in 125 patients with a 2 1/2-year follow-up. , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[32]  R. Buchbinder,et al.  2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Effects of a Media Campaign on Back Pain Beliefs and Its Potential Influence on Management of Low Back Pain in General Practice , 2001, Spine.

[33]  R. A. Davis,et al.  A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. , 1994, Journal of neurosurgery.

[34]  I. Holm,et al.  Trunk Muscle Strength, Cross-sectional Area, and Density in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Randomized to Lumbar Fusion or Cognitive Intervention and Exercises , 2004, Spine.

[35]  John P. Robinson,et al.  CHAPTER 3 – Measures of Subjective Well-Being , 1991 .

[36]  H. Strøm,et al.  Different versions of the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system and the defined daily dose – are drug utilisation data comparable? , 2000, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[37]  S. May.  Re: Exercise therapy for low back pain. A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back review Group. Spine 2000;25:2784--96. , 2001, Spine.

[38]  A. Brawanski,et al.  Does the choice of outcome scale influence prognostic factors for lumbar disc surgery? , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[39]  G. Wickström,et al.  Reproducibility of nine tests to measure spinal mobility and trunk muscle strength. , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[40]  J C Fairbank,et al.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. , 1980, Physiotherapy.

[41]  J. Katz,et al.  Lumbar Spinal Fusions: Surgical Rates, Costs, and Complications , 1995, Spine.

[42]  K. Palmer,et al.  Back pain in Britain: comparison of two prevalence surveys at an interval of 10 years , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[43]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[44]  E. Spangfort,et al.  The lumbar disc herniation. A computer-aided analysis of 2,504 operations. , 1972, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[45]  A. Keller,et al.  Reliability of the Isokinetic Trunk Extensor Test, Biering-Sørensen Test, and Åstrand Bicycle Test: Assessment of Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and Critical Difference in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Healthy Individuals , 2001, Spine.

[46]  R A Deyo,et al.  The importance of placebo effects in pain treatment and research. , 1994, JAMA.

[47]  E. Berger,et al.  Late postoperative results in 1000 work related lumbar spine conditions. , 2000, Surgical neurology.

[48]  B. Koes,et al.  Exercise Therapy for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Within the Framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group , 2000, Spine.

[49]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[50]  M. Roland,et al.  The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. , 2000, Spine.

[51]  T. Sand,et al.  Neck Pain in the General Population , 1994, Spine.

[52]  N. Semmer,et al.  The Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Work Perception, and Psychosocial Factors in Identifying Symptomatic Disc Herniations , 1995, Spine.

[53]  W. Assendelft,et al.  Behavioral Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Within the Framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group , 2000, Spine.

[54]  L. Covi,et al.  The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. , 1974, Behavioral science.

[55]  T. Bjerkedal,et al.  Socioeconomic Factors and Disability Retirement From Back Pain: A 1983–1993 Population-Based Prospective Study in Norway , 2000, Spine.

[56]  S. Eiskjær,et al.  1997 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: The Effect of Pedicle Screw Instrumentation on Functional Outcome and Fusion Rates in Posterolateral Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study , 1997, Spine.