Crosstalk Induced Delay Analysis of Randomly Distributed Mixed CNT Bundle Interconnect

In this paper, a more realistic analytical model for randomly distributed mixed carbon nanotube (CNT) bundle (MCB) is presented for the analysis of crosstalk induced delay. Several researchers have proposed analytical models for interconnects based on single-walled CNT (SWCNT), multi-walled CNT (MWCNT) bundle and most interestingly, spatially arranged mixed CNTs. Although, bundled SWCNTs and MWCNTs are easily realizable, but, practically it is almost impossible to fabricate a MCB with precise arrangements of SWCNTs and MWCNTs. Motivated by these facts, this paper presents a corner placement algorithm for randomly distributed SWCNTs and MWCNTs of different diameters in a MCB. The performance of MCB is compared with that of conventional bundled SWCNT and bundled MWCNT at different coupled interconnect lengths and spacing. Encouragingly, for a fixed cross-sectional area, the overall crosstalk induced delay of MCB reduces by 65.03% and 23.54% in comparison to the bundles having either SWCNTs or MWCNTs with smaller diameters, respectively. However, in contradiction to most of the previously reported results, bundled MWCNTs with larger diameters outperform the randomly distributed MCBs in terms of crosstalk performance.

[1]  Madhu Menon,et al.  Various bonding configurations of transition-metal atoms on carbon nanotubes: Their effect on contact resistance , 2000 .

[2]  P. Avouris,et al.  Engineering Carbon Nanotubes and Nanotube Circuits Using Electrical Breakdown , 2001, Science.

[3]  P. Burke Luttinger liquid theory as a model of the gigahertz electrical properties of carbon nanotubes , 2002 .

[4]  S. Louie,et al.  Quantum conductance of multiwall carbon nanotubes , 2002 .

[5]  P. Avouris,et al.  Multishell conduction in multiwalled carbon nanotubes , 2002 .

[6]  D. Glattli,et al.  Determination of the intershell conductance in multiwalled carbon nanotubes. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[7]  A. Kawabata,et al.  Carbon nanotube vias for future LSI interconnects , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE 2004 International Interconnect Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8729).

[8]  Y. Li,et al.  Greedy algorithms for packing unequal circles into a rectangular container , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  J. Meindl,et al.  Compact physical models for multiwall carbon-nanotube interconnects , 2006, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[10]  A. Kawabata,et al.  Novel approach to fabricating carbon nanotube via interconnects using size-controlled catalyst nanoparticles , 2006, 2006 International Interconnect Technology Conference.

[11]  M. S. Sarto,et al.  Electromagnetic Analysis of Radio-Frequency Signal Propagation Along SWCN Bundles , 2006, 2006 Sixth IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology.

[12]  A. Kawabata,et al.  Electrical Properties of Carbon Nanotube Via Interconnects Fabricated by Novel Damascene Process , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conferencee.

[13]  A. Maffucci,et al.  A transmission line model for metallic carbon nanotube interconnects , 2008, Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl..

[14]  J. Meindl,et al.  Performance Modeling for Single- and Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes as Signal and Power Interconnects in Gigascale Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[15]  Q.H. Liu,et al.  Crosstalk Prediction of Single- and Double-Walled Carbon-Nanotube (SWCNT/DWCNT) Bundle Interconnects , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[16]  M. S. Sarto,et al.  Fast Transient Analysis of Next-Generation Interconnects Based on Carbon Nanotubes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[17]  M. S. Sarto,et al.  Single-Conductor Transmission-Line Model of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[18]  A. Srivastava,et al.  A model for carbon nanotube interconnects , 2010 .

[19]  D. Pavlidis,et al.  Pronounced field emission from vertically aligned carbon nanotube blocks and bundles , 2011 .

[20]  D. Das,et al.  Analysis of Crosstalk in Single- and Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Interconnects and Its Impact on Gate Oxide Reliability , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[21]  Brajesh Kumar Kaushik,et al.  Analysis of propagation delay in mixed carbon nanotube bundle as global VLSI interconnects , 2012, 2012 Asia Pacific Conference on Postgraduate Research in Microelectronics and Electronics.

[22]  S. K. Manhas,et al.  Analysis of mixed CNT bundle interconnects: Impact on delay and power dissipation , 2012, 2012 5th International Conference on Computers and Devices for Communication (CODEC).

[23]  S. K. Manhas,et al.  Analysis of crosstalk delay and power dissipation in mixed CNT bundle interconnects , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Communications, Devices and Intelligent Systems (CODIS).

[24]  N. D. Pandya,et al.  Dynamic crosstalk effect in mixed cnt bundle interconnects , 2012 .

[25]  S. Subash,et al.  A New Spatially Rearranged Bundle of Mixed Carbon Nanotubes as VLSI Interconnection , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[26]  Brajesh Kumar Kaushik,et al.  An Accurate FDTD Model for Crosstalk Analysis of CMOS-Gate-Driven Coupled RLC Interconnects , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[27]  Vobulapuram Ramesh Kumar,et al.  Graphene Based On-Chip Interconnects and TSVs : Prospects and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Nanotechnology Magazine.

[28]  Brajesh Kumar Kaushik,et al.  Delay and crosstalk reliability issues in mixed MWCNT bundle interconnects , 2014, Microelectron. Reliab..

[29]  Brajesh Kumar Kaushik,et al.  Analysis of Delay and Dynamic Crosstalk in Bundled Carbon Nanotube Interconnects , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[30]  Brajesh Kumar Kaushik,et al.  Crosstalk noise modeling of multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) interconnects using finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) technique , 2015, Microelectron. Reliab..