Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback

Abstract This paper explores the relationship between teacher feedback and student revision in two academic writing classes. The study adopts a case study approach and looks at all the feedback given to six students over a complete course. Using data from teacher think aloud protocols, teacher and student interviews and student texts, it examines the extent to which teachers focused on formal language concerns when they gave feedback and the use that students made of this feedback in their revisions. Findings suggest that despite the teachers’ beliefs and teaching approaches, language accuracy was a very important focus for their feedback. While most of the students engaged with this feedback when revising their drafts, the extent to which they used it varied among the case study subjects. Two case studies who made consistent and sustained use of form-focused feedback are discussed in greater detail to examine student engagement with form-focused feedback over a complete course.

[1]  Ilona Leki.  THE PREFERENCES OF ESL STUDENTS FOR ERROR CORRECTION IN COLLEGE-LEVEL WRITING CLASSES , 1991 .

[2]  Charlene Polio,et al.  “If I only had more time:” ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions , 1998 .

[3]  J. Hedgcock,et al.  Some Input on Input: Two Analyses of Student Response to Expert Feedback in L2 Writing , 1996 .

[4]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  SALIENCE OF FEEDBACK ON ERROR AND ITS EFFECT ON EFL WRITING QUALITY , 1986 .

[5]  J. Swales,et al.  ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work , 1988 .

[6]  Ann Raimes,et al.  Language Proficiency, Writing Ability, and Composing Strategies: A Study of ESL College Student Writers† , 1987 .

[7]  D. Ferris,et al.  Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications , 1997 .

[8]  P. Skehan.  语言学习认知法 = A cognitive approach to language learning , 1998 .

[9]  Cui Yan,et al.  Error Correction in Foreign Language Teaching , 2001 .

[10]  Fiona Hyland,et al.  The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers , 1998 .

[11]  John Truscott,et al.  Review Article The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes , 1996 .

[12]  D. Ferris.  Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms* , 1995 .

[13]  John F. Lalande.  Reducing Composition Errors: An Experiment , 1982 .

[14]  Harriet D. Semke.  Effects of the Red Pen , 1984 .

[15]  J. Truscott.  The Case for "The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes": A Response to Ferris , 1999 .

[16]  F. Hyland.  ESL writers and feedback: giving more autonomy to students , 2000 .

[17]  Vivian Zamel.  Responding to Student Writing , 1985 .

[18]  D. Ferris.  THE CASE FOR GRAMMAR CORRECTION IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: A RESPONSE TO TRUSCOTT (1996) , 1999 .

[19]  Dana R. Ferris,et al.  Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing , 2002 .

[20]  Dana R. Ferris,et al.  ERROR FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: HOW EXPLICIT DOES IT NEED TO BE? , 2001 .

[21]  Christine Goring. Kepner.  An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second‐Language Writing Skills , 1991 .

[22]  John S. Hedgcock,et al.  Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing , 1994 .

[23]  D. Ferris.  The Influence of Teacher Commentary on Student Revision , 1997 .