Putting behavior on hold decreases reward value of need-instrumental objects outside of awareness

We examined whether cues that put impulsive behavior towards rewarding objects on hold reduces the value of the rewarding objects outside of conscious awareness. We manipulated the reward value of water by making participants thirsty, or not. Next, a bottle of water was subliminally presented in a go/no-go task, and paired with either go cues or no-go cues (putting behavior on hold). Subsequently, as a measure of reward value of water, participants estimated the size of water objects. Results showed that repeatedly withholding behavior towards water reduced the perceived size of water objects, but only when participants were made thirsty. These results suggest that withholding impulsive behavior towards objects that serve basic needs nonconsciously reduces reward value of these objects. Implications for nonconscious behavior regulation are briefly discussed.

[1]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. , 2000 .

[2]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[3]  Harm Veling,et al.  When approach motivation and behavioral inhibition collide: Behavior regulation through stimulus devaluation , 2018 .

[4]  H. Aarts,et al.  PerCePtion in the serviCe of goAl Pursuit: motivAtion to AttAin goAls enhAnCes the PerCeived size of goAl-instrumentAl oBjeCts , 2008 .

[5]  W. Stroebe,et al.  The allure of forbidden food: On the role of attention in self-regulation , 2008 .

[6]  D. Proffitt.  Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[7]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower. , 1999, Psychological review.

[8]  Emily Balcetis,et al.  See what you want to see: motivational influences on visual perception. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  P. Gollwitzer.  Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[10]  H. Aarts,et al.  On the emergence of deprivation-reducing behaviors: Subliminal priming of behavior representations turns deprivation into motivation , 2008 .

[11]  S. Channon,et al.  The effect of short-term fasting on processing of food cues in normal subjects. , 1990 .

[12]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  Impulse and Constraint: Perspectives From Personality Psychology, Convergence With Theory in Other Areas, and Potential for Integration , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[13]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Affective Influences of Selective Attention , 2006 .

[14]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  The Devaluation Effect: Activating a Need Devalues Unrelated Objects , 2003 .

[15]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulle- Tin Chen, Bargh / Consequences of Automatic Evaluation Immediate Behavioral Predispositions to Approach or Avoid the Stimulus , 2022 .

[16]  J. Bruner,et al.  Value and need as organizing factors in perception. , 1947, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[17]  A. Markman,et al.  The Devaluation Effect : Activating a Need Devalues Unrelated Choice Options , 2002 .

[18]  J. Bruner.  On perceptual readiness. , 1957, Psychological review.

[19]  Gordon B. Moskowitz,et al.  Preconscious effects of temporary goals on attention , 2002 .

[20]  John A Bargh,et al.  Liking is for doing: the effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  K. Vohs,et al.  The Strength Model of Self-Control , 2007, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[22]  Ruud Custers,et al.  The nonconscious cessation of goal pursuit: when goals and negative affect are coactivated. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  H. Aarts,et al.  On the psychology of drinking: being thirsty and perceptually ready. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[24]  S. Yantis,et al.  Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.