DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION PROCEDURE FOR MICROSCOPIC SIMULATION MODELS

Microscopic traffic simulation models have been widely accepted and applied in transportation engineering and planning practice for the past decades because simulation is cost-effective, safe, and fast. To achieve high fidelity and credibility for a traffic simulation model, calibration and validation are of utmost importance. Most calibration efforts reported in the literature have focused on the informal practice with a specific simulation model, but seldom did they propose a systematic procedure or guideline for simulation model calibration and validation. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a procedure for microscopic simulation model calibration and validation. Three widely used microscopic traffic simulation models, VISSIM, PARAMICS, and CORSIM, were selected for model review and practice of model calibration and validation. The validity of the proposed procedure was evaluated and demonstrated via two case studies including an actuated signalized intersection and a 5-mile freeway segment with a lane-closure work zone. The simulation results were compared against the field data to determine the performance of the calibrated models. The proposed procedure yielded acceptable results for all applications, thus confirming that it was effective for the different networks and simulation models used in the study. Although the calibrated parameters generated the performance measures that were representative of the field conditions, the simulation results of the default parameters were significantly different from the field data.

[1]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[2]  A. Williams A Stochastic Transportation Problem , 1963 .

[3]  Ilsoo Yun,et al.  Optimization of Time-of-Day Breakpoints for Better Traffic Signal Control , 2004 .

[4]  John T Harvey,et al.  Application of Genetic Algorithm in Asphalt Pavement Design , 2004 .

[5]  Harilaos N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  A microscopic traffic simulator for evaluation of dynamic traffic management systems , 1996 .

[6]  Yunlong Zhang,et al.  Systematic Validation of a Microscopic Traffic Simulation Program , 2004 .

[7]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[8]  Henry X. Liu,et al.  A calibration procedure for microscopic traffic simulation , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[9]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Guidelines for Calibration of Microsimulation Models: Framework and Applications , 2004 .

[10]  David Beasley,et al.  An overview of genetic algorithms: Part 1 , 1993 .

[11]  Tarek Hegazy,et al.  Bridge Deck Management System with Integrated Life-Cycle Cost Optimization , 2004 .

[12]  B. Hellinga REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CALIBRATION OF TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODELS , 1998 .

[13]  R Wiedemann,et al.  MODELLING OF RTI-ELEMENTS ON MULTI-LANE ROADS , 1991 .

[14]  Nagui M. Rouphail,et al.  STATISTICALLY-BASED VALIDATION OF COMPUTER SIMULATION MODELS IN TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT , 2002 .

[15]  H. Mahmassani,et al.  GLOBAL MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION PROCEDURE FOR MULTINOMIAL PROBIT (MNP) MODEL PARAMETERS , 2000 .

[16]  Xin Jin,et al.  CALIBRATION OF FRESIM FOR SINGAPORE EXPRESSWAY USING GENETIC ALGORITHM , 1998 .

[17]  R T Milam,et al.  RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES FOR THE CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODELS , 2000 .

[18]  Byungkyu Park,et al.  MICROSCOPIC SIMULATION MODEL CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION : A CASE STUDY OF VISSIM FOR A COORDINATED ACTUATED SIGNAL SYSTEM , 2003 .

[19]  Ali Haghani,et al.  Integrated Approach for Emergency Medical Service Location and Assignment Problem , 2004 .