Model surgery technique for Le Fort I osteotomy--alteration in occlusal plane associated with upward transposition of posterior maxilla.

It is difficult to translate analytical values into accurate model surgery by traditional methods, especially when moving the posterior maxilla. This is because cephalometric radiographic analysis generated information on movement of the posterior nasal spine (PNS) can not be recreated in model surgery. Therefore, we propose a method that accurately reflects such analysis and simulation of movement using Quick Ceph 2000 (Orthodontic Processing Corporation, USA). This will allow the enrichment of model surgery prior to actual surgery in cases where upward movement of the posterior maxilla is involved. All patients who participated in this study had skeletal mandibular prognathism characterized by a small occlusal plane angle in respect to the S-N plane. Cephalometric radiographs were taken and analyzed with the Quick Ceph 2000. Pre- and post-surgical evaluations were performed using Sassouni arc analysis and Ricketts analysis. Prior to transposition, we then prepared an anterior occlusal bite record on a model mounted on an articulator. This bite was then used as a reference when the molar parts were to be transposed upwards. The use of a occlusal bite permitted an accurate translation of the preoperative computer simulation into model surgery, thus facilitating favorable surgical results.

[1]  L. Wolford,et al.  Occlusal plane alteration in orthognathic surgery-part I: Effects on function and esthetics. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  P. Buschang,et al.  Occlusal plane alteration in orthognathic surgery--Part II: Long-term stability of results. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  R M Ricketts,et al.  An overview of computerized cephalometrics. , 1972, American journal of orthodontics.

[4]  E Ellis,et al.  Accuracy of model surgery: evaluation of an old technique and introduction of a new one. , 1990, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[5]  A. Kameda,et al.  [Some elementary facts to be considered in studying of posteroanterior cephalogram]. , 1972, Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai zasshi = The journal of Japan Orthodontic Society.

[6]  M Harris,et al.  Model surgery for orthognathic planning. , 1990, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[7]  L. Wolford,et al.  Altered orthognathic surgical sequencing and a modified approach to model surgery. , 1994, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[8]  L. Wolford,et al.  Occlusal plane alteration in orthognathic surgery--Part I: Effects on function and esthetics. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  W. Evans,et al.  Surgical manipulation of the occlusal plane. , 1990, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[10]  V. Sassouni,et al.  A roentgenographic cephalometric analysis of cephalo-facio-dental relationships , 1955 .