Quantification of the Modifications in the Dominant Frequency of Ventricular Fibrillation under Conditions of Ischemia and Reperfusion: An Experimental Study

The characteristics of ventricular fibrillatory signals vary as a function of the time elapsed from the onset of arrhythmia and the maneuvers used to maintain coronary perfusion. The dominant frequency (FrD) of the power spectrum of ventricular fibrillation (VF) is known to decrease after interrupting coronary perfusion, though the corresponding recovery process upon reestablishing coronary flow has not been quantified to date. With the aim of investigating the recovery of the FrD during reperfusion after a brief ischemic, period, 11 isolated and perfused rabbit heart preparations were used to analyze the signals obtained with three unipolar epicardial electrodes (E1‐E3) and a bipolar electrode immersed in the thermostatizfid organ bath (E4), following the electrical induction of VF. Recordings were made under conditions of maintained coronary perfusion (5 min), upon interrupting perfusion (15 mini, and after reperfusion (5 min), FrD was determined using Welch's method. The variations in FrD were quantified during both ischemia and reperfusion, based on an exponential model AFrD = A exp (‐t/C). During ischemia ΔFrD is the difference between FrD and the minimum value, while t is the time elapsed from the interruption of coronary perfusion. During reperfusion ΔFrD is the difference between the maximum value and FrD, while t is the time elapsed from the restoration of perfusion, A is one of the constants of the model, and C is the time constant. FrD exhibited respective initial values of 16.20 ± 1.67, 16.03 ± 1.38, and 16.03 ± 1.80 Hz in the epicardial leads, and 15.09 ±1.07 Hz in the bipolar lead within the bath. No significant variations were observed during maintained coronary perfusion. The fit of the FrD variations to the model during ischemia and reperfusion proved significant in nine experiments. The mean time constants C obtained on fitting to the model during ischemia were as follows: El =294.4 ± 75.6, E2 = 225.7 ± 48.5, E3 = 327.4 ± 79.7, and E4 = 298.7 ± 43.9 seconds. The mean values of C obtained during reperfusion, and the significance of the differences with respect to the ischemic period were: El = 57.5 ± 8.4 (P ± 0.01), E2 = 64.5 ± 11.2 (P0.01), E3 = 80.7 ± 13.3 (P < 0.01), and E4 = 74.9 ± 13.6 (P < 0.0001). The time course variations of the FrD of the VF power spectrum fit an exponential model during ischemia and reperfusion. The time constants of the model during reperfusion after a brief ischemic period are significantly shorter than those obtained during ischemia.

[1]  J Tranum-Jensen,et al.  The subendocardial border zone during acute ischemia of the rabbit heart: an electrophysiologic, metabolic, and morphologic correlative study. , 1986, Circulation.

[2]  A. Hernández,et al.  Relation between power spectrum time course during ventricular fibrillation and electromechanical dissociation. Effects of coronary perfusion and nifedipine. , 1986, European heart journal.

[3]  K. Arakawa,et al.  A fast fourier transform analysis of coronary reperfusion‐induced ventricular fibrillation and the modification by dibutyryl cyclic amp in a cat model , 1992, Clinical cardiology.

[4]  J. Spear,et al.  Electrophysiologic recovery in postischemic, stunned myocardium despite persistent systolic dysfunction. , 1993, American heart journal.

[5]  A. Murray,et al.  Analysis of the Body Surface ECG Measured in Independent Leads During Ventricular Fibrillation in Humans , 1995, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  A Murray,et al.  Changes in the surface electrocardiogram during the onset of spontaneous ventricular fibrillation in man. , 1994, European heart journal.

[7]  M R Franz,et al.  In vivo electrophysiological detection of myocardial ischemia through monophasic action potential recording. , 1991, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[8]  P. Wach,et al.  Effects of propafenone on the median frequency of ventricular fibrillation in Langendorff perfused guinea-pig hearts. , 1996, Cardiovascular research.

[9]  R. Jabr,et al.  Arrhythmia and delayed recovery of cardiac action potential during reperfusion after ischemia. Role of oxygen radical-induced no-reflow phenomenon. , 1995, Circulation research.

[10]  M. Lab,et al.  Mechanically induced changes in action potential duration and left ventricular segment length in acute regional ischaemia in the in situ porcine heart. , 1994, Cardiovascular research.

[11]  R. Coronel,et al.  T-Q, S-T segment mapping and hyperemia in reperfused pig heart with ischemic preconditioning. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[12]  W. Kernohan,et al.  Fourier analysis of ventricular fibrillation of varied aetiology. , 1990, European heart journal.

[13]  F. Chorro,et al.  Modifications in the evolution of the dominant frequency in ventricular fibrillation induced by amiodarone, diltiazem, and flecainide. An experimental study. , 1996, Journal of electrocardiology.

[14]  D. Durrer,et al.  The Effect of Acute Coronary Artery Occlusion on Subepicardial Transmembrane Potentials in the Intact Porcine Heart , 1977, Circulation.

[15]  S. Nattel,et al.  Mechanism of Selective Epicardial Activation Delay During Acute Myocardial Ischemia in Dogs , 1993, Circulation.

[16]  P. Penkoske,et al.  Disparate Electrophysiological Alterations Accompanying Dysrhythmia due to Coronary Occlusion and Reperfusion in the Cat , 1978, Circulation.

[17]  W. C. Randall,et al.  Electrophysiology of Coronary Reperfusion: A Mechanism for Reperfusion Arrhythmias , 1980, Circulation.

[18]  D. T. Kaplan,et al.  Repolarization Inhomogeneities in Ventricular Myocardium Change Dynamically With Abrupt Cycle Length Shortening , 1991, Circulation.

[19]  W. Cascio,et al.  The Ib phase of ventricular arrhythmias in ischemic in situ porcine heart is related to changes in cell-to-cell electrical coupling. Experimental Cardiology Group, University of North Carolina. , 1995, Circulation.

[20]  W. Kernohan,et al.  Pharmacological analysis of established ventricular fibrillation , 1990, British journal of pharmacology.

[21]  R. M. Heethaar,et al.  Signal analysis of ventricular fibrillation , 1979 .

[22]  A Welz,et al.  Frequency of ventricular fibrillation as a predictor of defibrillation success during cardiac surgery. , 1994, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[23]  A. Camm,et al.  Five-year follow-up of 101 elderly subjects by means of long-term ambulatory cardiac monitoring. , 1984, European heart journal.

[24]  H. Schmid-schönbein,et al.  Complex dynamic order in ventricular fibrillation. , 1994, Journal of electrocardiology.

[25]  R F Griffith,et al.  Median frequency--a new parameter for predicting defibrillation success rate. , 1991, Annals of emergency medicine.

[26]  A. Wilde,et al.  Changes in conduction velocity during acute ischemia in ventricular myocardium of the isolated porcine heart. , 1986, Circulation.