Building modern coexistence theory from the ground up: the role of community assembly

Modern coexistence theory (MCT) is one of the leading methods to understand species coexistence. It uses invasion growth rates – the average, per-capita growth rate of a rare species – to identify when and why species coexist. Despite significant advances in dissecting coexistence mechanisms when coexistence occurs, MCT relies on a “mutual invasibility” condition designed for two species communities, but poorly defined for species rich communities. Here, we review well-known issues with this component of MCT and propose a solution based on recent mathematical advances. We propose a clear framework for expanding MCT to species rich communities and for understanding invasion resistance as well as coexistence, especially for communities which could not be analyzed with MCT so far. Using two data-driven community models from the literature, we illustrate the utility of our framework and highlight the opportunities for bridging the fields of community assembly and species coexistence. Statement of authorship: Studied conceived jointly by JWS and SJS. JWS and SJS wrote the manuscript together. JWS wrote the python code and SJS wrote R code. Data accessibility: All computer code used in this manuscript will be made publicly available on figshare. Niche and fitness differences | Storage effect | Coexistence

[1]  A. Letten,et al.  Different measures of niche and fitness differences tell different tales , 2022, Oikos.

[2]  R. Germain,et al.  Coexistence in Ecology: A Mechanistic Perspective. Monographs in Population Biology. By Mark A. McPeek. Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press. $105.00 (hardcover); $45.00 (paper). x + 454 p.; ill.; index. ISBN: 9780691204864 (hc); 9780691204871 (pb); 9780691229225 (eb). 2022. , 2022, The Quarterly review of biology.

[3]  Lauren G. Shoemaker,et al.  Accounting for demographic uncertainty increases predictions for species coexistence: A case study with annual plants , 2022, Ecology letters.

[4]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Permanence via invasion graphs: incorporating community assembly into modern coexistence theory , 2022, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[5]  S. Ellner,et al.  Modeling phytoplankton-zooplankton interactions: opportunities for species richness and challenges for modern coexistence theory , 2022, bioRxiv.

[6]  Ó. Godoy,et al.  Mapping species niche and fitness differences for communities with multiple interaction types , 2021, Oikos.

[7]  S. Schreiber Temporally auto-correlated predator attacks structure ecological communities , 2021, bioRxiv.

[8]  T. Fukami,et al.  Untangling the complexity of priority effects in multispecies communities , 2021, bioRxiv.

[9]  R. Chisholm,et al.  Invasion growth rate and its relevance to persistence: a response to Technical Comment by Ellner et al. , 2020, Ecology letters.

[10]  J. Spaak,et al.  Effects of pigment richness and size variation on coexistence, richness and function in light‐limited phytoplankton , 2020, Journal of Ecology.

[11]  P. Chesson Species coexistence , 2020, Theoretical Ecology.

[12]  S. Schreiber,et al.  A classification of the dynamics of three-dimensional stochastic ecological systems , 2020, The Annals of Applied Probability.

[13]  S. Schreiber Positively and negatively autocorrelated environmental fluctuations have opposing effects on species coexistence , 2019, bioRxiv.

[14]  C. Carpentier,et al.  Species richness increases fitness differences, but does not affect niche differences. , 2019, Ecology letters.

[15]  C. Martorell,et al.  Fluctuation-independent niche differentiation and relative non-linearity drive coexistence in a species-rich grassland. , 2019, Ecology.

[16]  B. Gilbert,et al.  The Invasion Criterion: A Common Currency for Ecological Research. , 2019, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Christopher A. Johnson,et al.  Coexistence and competitive exclusion in mutualism. , 2019, Ecology.

[18]  Carlos A. Serván,et al.  Reconciling empirical interactions and species coexistence. , 2019, Ecology letters.

[19]  T. Fukami,et al.  Applying modern coexistence theory to priority effects , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  P. Venail,et al.  Size differences predict niche and relative fitness differences between phytoplankton species but not their coexistence , 2019, The ISME Journal.

[21]  Frederik De Laender,et al.  Intuitive and broadly applicable definitions of niche and fitness differences. , 2020, Ecology letters.

[22]  Giles Hooker,et al.  An expanded modern coexistence theory for empirical applications. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[23]  M. Benaïm,et al.  Persistence and extinction for stochastic ecological models with internal and external variables , 2018, Journal of mathematical biology.

[24]  P. Chesson Updates on mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity , 2018, Journal of Ecology.

[25]  Daniel B. Stouffer,et al.  Accurate predictions of coexistence in natural systems require the inclusion of facilitative interactions and environmental dependency , 2018, Journal of Ecology.

[26]  Simon Maccracken Stump,et al.  Chesson's coexistence theory , 2018 .

[27]  Joan M. Meiners,et al.  Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[28]  Manpreet K. Dhami,et al.  Species coexistence through simultaneous fluctuation-dependent mechanisms , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Brittany J. Teller,et al.  Weak interspecific interactions in a sagebrush steppe? Conflicting evidence from observations and experiments. , 2018, Ecology.

[30]  Rudolf P. Rohr,et al.  Towards the Integration of Niche and Network Theories. , 2018, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  A. Letten,et al.  Coexistence theory and the frequency-dependence of priority effects , 2018, bioRxiv.

[32]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Robust permanence for ecological equations with internal and external feedbacks , 2017, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[33]  Serguei Saavedra,et al.  A structural approach for understanding multispecies coexistence , 2017 .

[34]  S. Schreiber,et al.  When rarity has costs: coexistence under positive frequency-dependence and environmental stochasticity , 2017, bioRxiv.

[35]  Tadashi Fukami,et al.  Linking modern coexistence theory and contemporary niche theory , 2017 .

[36]  Alexandru Hening,et al.  Coexistence and extinction for stochastic Kolmogorov systems , 2017, The Annals of Applied Probability.

[37]  Swati Patel,et al.  Robust permanence for ecological equations with internal and external feedbacks , 2016, Journal of mathematical biology.

[38]  B. Gilbert,et al.  Species coexistence: macroevolutionary relationships and the contingency of historical interactions , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Sebastian J. Schreiber,et al.  Robust Permanence for Ecological Maps , 2016, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[40]  Peter B. Adler,et al.  Large niche differences emerge at the recruitment stage to stabilize grassland coexistence , 2015 .

[41]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor , 2015 .

[42]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Plant functional traits and the multidimensional nature of species coexistence , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Phylogenetic relatedness and the determinants of competitive outcomes. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[44]  Oscar Godoy,et al.  Phenology effects on invasion success: insights from coupling field experiments to coexistence theory. , 2014, Ecology.

[45]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Experimental evidence that evolutionary relatedness does not affect the ecological mechanisms of coexistence in freshwater green algae. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[46]  J. HilleRisLambers,et al.  Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory , 2012 .

[47]  Annette Ostling,et al.  Community robustness and limiting similarity in periodic environments , 2012, Theoretical Ecology.

[48]  Junjie Wei,et al.  Dynamics and pattern formation in a diffusive predator–prey system with strong Allee effect in prey , 2011 .

[49]  E. Mordecai Pathogen impacts on plant communities: unifying theory, concepts, and empirical work , 2011 .

[50]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  A competitive network theory of species diversity , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Sebastian J. Schreiber,et al.  Robust permanence for interacting structured populations , 2010, 1005.4146.

[52]  Peter Chesson,et al.  The interaction between predation and competition , 2008, Nature.

[53]  Sebastian J Schreiber,et al.  Persistence despite perturbations for interacting populations. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[54]  Sebastian J. Schreiber,et al.  From simple rules to cycling in community assembly , 2004 .

[55]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Quantifying and testing coexistence mechanisms arising from recruitment fluctuations. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[56]  Jonathan M. Chase Community assembly: when should history matter? , 2003, Oecologia.

[57]  Philip H. Warren,et al.  MAPPING THE ASSEMBLY OF PROTIST COMMUNITIES IN MICROCOSMS , 2003 .

[58]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[59]  Sebastian J. Schreiber,et al.  Criteria for Cr Robust Permanence , 2000 .

[60]  M. Krupa Robust heteroclinic cycles , 1997 .

[61]  Richard Law,et al.  PERMANENCE AND THE ASSEMBLY OF ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 1996 .

[62]  Werner Brannath,et al.  Heteroclinic networks on the tetrahedron , 1994 .

[63]  P. Chesson Multispecies Competition in Variable Environments , 1994 .

[64]  Jerry C. Blackford,et al.  Self-assembling food webs : a global viewpoint of coexistence of species in Lotka-Volterra communities , 1992 .

[65]  Z. Teng,et al.  Persistence in dynamical systems , 1990 .

[66]  Peter Chesson,et al.  MacArthur's consumer-resource model , 1990 .

[67]  G. Wolkowicz,et al.  Successful invasion of a food web in a chemostat. , 1989, Mathematical biosciences.

[68]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Invasibility and stochastic boundedness in monotonic competition models , 1989 .

[69]  P. Holmes,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , 1983, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[70]  Peter Chesson,et al.  The stabilizing effect of a random environment , 1982 .

[71]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  A general cooperation theorem for hypercycles , 1981 .

[72]  Michael Turelli,et al.  Niche overlap and invasion of competitors in random environments I. Models without demographic stochasticity , 1981 .

[73]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Competition for Space and the Structure of Ecological Communities , 1978 .

[74]  M. Turelli,et al.  Does environmental variability limit niche overlap? , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[75]  R. May,et al.  Nonlinear Aspects of Competition Between Three Species , 1975 .

[76]  D. Janzen Herbivores and the Number of Tree Species in Tropical Forests , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[77]  R. Macarthur Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. , 1970, Theoretical population biology.

[78]  John Vandermeer,et al.  The Competitive Structure of Communities: An Experimental Approach with Protozoa , 1969 .

[79]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[80]  R. Paine Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[81]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[82]  S. Schreiber Coexistence for species sharing a predator , 2004 .

[83]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[84]  John H. Lawton,et al.  The Ecological Consequences of Shared Natural Enemies , 1994 .

[85]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Heteroclinic cycles in ecological differential equations , 1994 .

[86]  T. Fagerström,et al.  Competition and coexistence in plant , 1994 .

[87]  D. Sines Towards integration. , 1990, Nursing.

[88]  P. Schuster,et al.  Permanence and Uninvadability for Deterministic Population Models , 1984 .

[89]  David Tilman,et al.  Phytoplankton Community Ecology: The Role of Limiting Nutrients , 1982 .

[90]  R. McGehee,et al.  Some mathematical problems concerning the ecological principle of competitive exclusion , 1977 .