Expandable Pedicle Screw Trajectory in Cadaveric Lumbar Vertebra: An Evaluation Using Microcomputed Tomography

Study Design An in-vitro cadaver-based measurement using microcomputed tomography. Objectives To evaluate the safety of removal of expandable pedicle screws (EPSs) in human vertebral bodies after a long (6 mo) insertion time. Summary of Background Data Transpedicular fixation is commonly used for posterior fixation of the spine. Osteoporotic patients are in high risk of internal fixation failure. EPS is an available device for increasing transpedical fixation in the osteoporotic spine. However, it is unclear that how much the diameter of the expanding screw tip increases in the human vertebral body, and no reports have assessed the potential for fracture of the pedicle when the EPS is removed. Therefore, the safety of removal of EPS needs to be evaluated. Methods In this study, 6.50 mm EPSs were inserted into cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The maximum diameters of expansion, the maximum diameters of the EPS trajectories, and the diameters of the EPS trajectories in the pedicles were measured using microcomputed tomography imaging and 3-dimensional reconstruction. Regions of interest of the same size adjacent to the EPS in the pedicle and in the vertebral body were reconstructed and analyzed using the same thresholds (1000). Bone volume divided by total volume (BV/TV) in these regions of interest was determined. Results The maximum diameter of expansion of the EPSs in the vertebral body was 7.63 mm, a 17.38% increase from the original diameter. The maximum diameter of the EPS trajectory and the diameter of the EPS trajectory in the pedicle were 7.56 mm and 7.09 mm, respectively, increases of 16.31% and 9.08%. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). In the pedicle, there was a negative correlation between the diameter of the EPS trajectory and the BV/TV along the EPS trajectory (r=−0.88; P=0.002). In the vertebral body, a negative correlation occurred between the maximum expansion diameter of the EPS and vertebral BV/TV (r=−0.85; P=0.004). Conclusions The EPS could be reliably removed after expansion without fracturing the pedicle. Furthermore, the BV/TV had an important influence on the degree of expansion of EPS and whether or not pedicle fracture occurs.

[1]  A. Alanay,et al.  Minimal invasive short posterior instrumentation plus balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate for burst and severe compression lumbar fractures. , 2009, Spine.

[2]  B. Li,et al.  Micro-CT evaluation and histological analysis of screw-bone interface of expansive pedicle screw in osteoporotic sheep. , 2008, Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi.

[3]  C. Rubin,et al.  Evaluation of trabecular mechanical and microstructural properties in human calcaneal bone of advanced age using mechanical testing, microCT, and DXA. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  R. Vyas,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of Implant Removal for Patients With Recurrent Back Pain After a Failed Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery , 2007, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[5]  T. Sınmazçelik,et al.  Evaluation of Cyanoacrylate Augmentation of Transpedicular Screw Pullout Strength , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[6]  G. Andersson,et al.  Augmentation of Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength Using an Injectable Calcium Phosphate Cement as a Function of Injection Timing and Method , 2004, Spine.

[7]  D. Spengler,et al.  Evaluation of calcium sulfate paste for augmentation of lumbar pedicle screw pullout strength. , 2002, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[8]  B. Bai,et al.  Augmentation of Anterior Vertebral Body Screw Fixation by an Injectable, Biodegradable Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute , 2001, Spine.

[9]  S. Cook,et al.  Lumbosacral fixation using expandable pedicle screws. an alternative in reoperation and osteoporosis. , 2001, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[10]  E. Schneider,et al.  Comparison of the in vitro holding strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in a fully inserted setting and backed out 180 degrees. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[11]  S. Cook,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation and preliminary clinical experience with an expansive pedicle screw design. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[12]  K. Okuyama,et al.  Can insertional torque predict screw loosening and related failures? An in vivo study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion. , 2000, Spine.

[13]  R. Winter,et al.  Complications associated with pedicle screws. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  S. Yerby,et al.  Revision of Failed Pedicle Screws Using Hydroxyapatite Cement: A Biomechanical Analysis , 1998, Spine.

[15]  R. Ellenbogen,et al.  Revision Pedicle Screws: Bigger, Longer Shims‐What Is Best? , 1998, Spine.

[16]  J. Lotz,et al.  Carbonated Apatite Cement Augmentation of Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Lumbar Spine , 1997, Spine.

[17]  T. Washio,et al.  Structural Characteristics of the Pedicle and Its Role in Screw Stability , 1997, Spine.

[18]  N. Sharkey,et al.  Lumbar pedicle screw salvage: pullout testing of three different pedicle screw designs. , 1995, Journal of spinal disorders.

[19]  M. Krag,et al.  Repair of failed transpedicle screw fixation. A biomechanical study comparing polymethylmethacrylate, milled bone, and matchstick bone reconstruction. , 1994, Spine.

[20]  W. G. Thomas,et al.  Neurological deterioration after cement injection into a vertebral body. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  K. Murota,et al.  An Experimental Study on Transpedicular Screw Fixation in Relation to Osteoporosis of the Lumbar Spine , 1991, Spine.

[22]  D. E. Swartz,et al.  Importance of bone mineral density in instrumented spine fusions. , 1991, Spine.