Breast Cancer Risk and Progressive Histology in Serial Benign Biopsies

Background: More than 1 million women per year in the United States with benign breast biopsies are known to be at elevated risk for breast cancer (BC), with risk stratified on histologic categories of epithelial proliferation. Here we assessed women who had serial benign biopsies over time and how changes in the histologic classification affected BC risk. Methods: In the Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease Cohort of 13 466 women, 1414 women had multiple metachronous benign biopsies (10.5%). Both initial and subsequent biopsies were assessed histologically. BC risk for clinical and prognostic factors was assessed using subdistribution models to account for competing risks, and logistic regression/Wilcoxon/chi-square tests to assess covariates. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Breast cancer risk for women with serial biopsies, stratified by histologic category in the later biopsies, was similar to women with a single biopsy. We found that changes in histological category between initial and subsequent biopsy statistically significantly impacted BC risk. Women with nonproliferative initial findings and subsequent proliferative findings had an increased risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06 to 2.94, P = .03) compared with no change. Among women with proliferative disease without atypia at initial biopsy, risk decreased if later biopsy regressed to nonproliferative (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.25 to 0.98) and increased if later biopsy showed progression to atypical hyperplasia (HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 0.73 to 3.05) compared with no change (P = .04). Conclusions: We found that breast cancer risk increases in women with progressive epithelial proliferation over time and decreases in women whose biopsies show less proliferation. This finding has important implications for effective clinical management of the 100 000 women per year who have multiple benign breast biopsies.

[1]  R. Vierkant,et al.  Natural history of age-related lobular involution and impact on breast cancer risk , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[2]  C. Vachon,et al.  Breast Density and Benign Breast Disease: Risk Assessment to Identify Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  V Shane Pankratz,et al.  Model for individualized prediction of breast cancer risk after a benign breast biopsy. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  G. Colditz,et al.  Breast cancer risk associated with benign breast disease: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[5]  Mary Beth Terry,et al.  Changes in mammographic density over time in breast cancer cases and women at high risk for breast cancer , 2014, International journal of cancer.

[6]  Derek C. Radisky,et al.  Understanding the Premalignant Potential of Atypical Hyperplasia through Its Natural History: A Longitudinal Cohort Study , 2014, Cancer Prevention Research.

[7]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Breast cancer risk assessment across the risk continuum: genetic and nongenetic risk factors contributing to differential model performance , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[8]  Stephen R Grobmyer,et al.  Utilization of minimally invasive breast biopsy for the evaluation of suspicious breast lesions. , 2011, American journal of surgery.

[9]  Romayne A. Thompson,et al.  Age-related lobular involution and risk of breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  T. Sutcliffe,et al.  Chronic Conditions, Functional Limitations, and Special Health Care Needs of School-Aged Children Born With Extremely Low-Birth-Weight in the 1990s , 2005, JAMA.

[11]  Stephen W Duffy,et al.  A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors , 2004, Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice.

[12]  G. Colditz,et al.  Cumulative risk of breast cancer to age 70 years according to risk factor status: data from the Nurses' Health Study. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  Robert Gray,et al.  A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk , 1999 .

[14]  W D Plummer,et al.  Long-term risk of breast cancer in women with fibroadenoma. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  L. Brinton,et al.  Breast cancer risk associated with proliferative breast disease and atypical hyperplasia , 1993, Cancer.

[16]  P. Wingo,et al.  Histologic types of benign breast disease and the risk for breast cancer , 1992, Cancer.

[17]  M. Gail,et al.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  W. Dupont,et al.  Breast cancer risk associated with proliferative disease, age at first birth, and a family history of breast cancer. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  W. Dupont,et al.  Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast: A long-term follow-up study , 1986 .

[20]  W D Dupont,et al.  Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  L. Hartmann,et al.  Atypical hyperplasia of the breast--risk assessment and management options. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  M. Silverstein Where's the outrage? , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.