Regional scale cropland carbon budgets: Evaluating a geospatial agricultural modeling system using inventory data

Accurate quantification and clear understanding of regional scale cropland carbon (C) cycling is critical for designing effective policies and management practices that can contribute toward stabilizing atmospheric CO2 concentrations. However, extrapolating site-scale observations to regional scales represents a major challenge confronting the agricultural modeling community. This study introduces a novel geospatial agricultural modeling system (GAMS) exploring the integration of the mechanistic Environmental Policy Integrated Climate model, spatially-resolved data, surveyed management data, and supercomputing functions for cropland C budgets estimates. This modeling system creates spatially-explicit modeling units at a spatial resolution consistent with remotely-sensed crop identification and assigns cropping systems to each of them by geo-referencing surveyed crop management information at the county or state level. A parallel computing algorithm was also developed to facilitate the computationally intensive model runs and output post-processing and visualization. We evaluated GAMS against National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) reported crop yields and inventory estimated county-scale cropland C budgets averaged over 2000-2008. We observed good overall agreement, with spatial correlation of 0.89, 0.90, 0.41, and 0.87, for crop yields, Net Primary Production (NPP), Soil Organic C (SOC) change, and Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE), respectively. However, we also detected notable differences in the magnitude of NPP and NEE, as well as in the spatial pattern of SOC change. By performing crop-specific annual comparisons, we discuss possible explanations for the discrepancies between GAMS and the inventory method, such as data requirements, representation of agroecosystem processes, completeness and accuracy of crop management data, and accuracy of crop area representation. Based on these analyses, we further discuss strategies to improve GAMS by updating input data and by designing more efficient parallel computing capability to quantitatively assess errors associated with the simulation of C budget components. The modularized design of the GAMS makes it flexible to be updated and adapted for different agricultural models so long as they require similar input data, and to be linked with socio-economic models to understand the effectiveness and implications of diverse C management practices and policies. A novel geospatial cropland carbon modeling system based on a mechanistic agroecosystem model.Close agreement between modeled cropland carbon budgets and those estimated by the inventory method.Detailed assessment and discussion by individual crop species.Highly modularized framework facilitating adaptation for diverse purposes, such as socio-economic analysis.

[1]  Mahesh N. Rao,et al.  A GIS-based modeling approach for implementation of sustainable farm management practices , 2000, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Paul T. Dyke,et al.  EPIC: An operational model for evaluation of agricultural sustainability , 1991 .

[3]  W. Parton,et al.  A general model for soil organic matter dynamics: sensitivity to litter chemistry, texture and management. , 1994 .

[4]  Jimmy R. Williams,et al.  An integrative modeling framework to evaluate the productivity and sustainability of biofuel crop production systems , 2010 .

[5]  Jaehak Jeong,et al.  EPIC and APEX: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation , 2012 .

[6]  W. Visser AGRICULTURE , 1952 .

[7]  Kendrick Killian,et al.  Scale and uncertainty in modeled soil organic carbon stock changes for US croplands using a process‐based model , 2010 .

[8]  Jeffrey A. Nichols,et al.  Application note: HPC-EPIC for high resolution simulations of environmental and sustainability assessment , 2011 .

[9]  Jimy Dudhia,et al.  Regional Climate–Weather Research and Forecasting Model , 2012 .

[10]  James A. Larson,et al.  Estimating Regional Changes in Soil Carbon with High Spatial Resolution , 2008 .

[11]  Valentina Krysanova,et al.  Parameter and input data uncertainty estimation for the assessment of long-term soil organic carbon dynamics , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  Pete Smith,et al.  A comparison of carbon accounting tools for arable crops in the United Kingdom , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[13]  Joseph H. A. Guillaume,et al.  Characterising performance of environmental models , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  R. Cesar Izaurralde,et al.  Integrated assessment of Hadley Center (HadCM2) climate-change impacts on agricultural productivity and irrigation water supply in the conterminous United States: Part II. Regional agricultural production in 2030 and 2095 , 2003 .

[15]  Oliver Sus,et al.  A linked carbon cycle and crop developmental model: Description and evaluation against measurements of carbon fluxes and carbon stocks at several European agricultural sites , 2010 .

[16]  Lisandro Dalcin,et al.  Parallel distributed computing using Python , 2011 .

[17]  Randy L. Raper,et al.  Simulating Field-Scale Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics Using EPIC , 2007 .

[18]  Marc Aubinet,et al.  Carbon balance assessment of a Belgian winter wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.) , 2008 .

[19]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  Identifying representative crop rotation patterns and grassland loss in the US Western Corn Belt , 2014 .

[20]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  The contribution of future agricultural trends in the US midwest to global climate change mitigation. , 2014 .

[21]  John R. Williams,et al.  SENSITIVITY AND UNCERTAINTY ANALYSES OF CROP YIELDS AND SOIL ORGANIC CARBON SIMULATED WITH EPIC , 2005 .

[22]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Modifying the Soil and Water Assessment Tool to simulate cropland carbon flux: model development and initial evaluation. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  Rüdiger Schaldach,et al.  Coupled simulation of regional land use change and soil carbon sequestration: A case study for the state of Hesse in Germany , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[24]  Jun Wang,et al.  IA-SDSS: A GIS-based land use decision support system with consideration of carbon sequestration , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[25]  SadeghiAli,et al.  Efficient multi-objective calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model with parallel computing software in Python , 2013 .

[26]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  Maintaining environmental quality while expanding biomass production: Sub-regional U.S. policy simulations , 2013 .

[27]  Yaxing Wei,et al.  Reconciling estimates of the contemporary North American carbon balance among terrestrial biosphere models, atmospheric inversions, and a new approach for estimating net ecosystem exchange from inventory‐based data , 2012 .

[28]  Junguo Liu,et al.  A GIS-based tool for modelling large-scale crop-water relations , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[29]  James W. Jones,et al.  Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change , 2013 .

[30]  Sushil Milak,et al.  EPIC modeling of soil organic carbon sequestration in croplands of Iowa. , 2008, Journal of environmental quality.

[31]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[32]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  North American Carbon Program (NACP) regional interim synthesis: Terrestrial biospheric model intercomparison , 2012 .

[33]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[34]  A. Thomson,et al.  Simulating long-term and residual effects of nitrogen fertilization on corn yields, soil carbon sequestration, and soil nitrogen dynamics. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.

[35]  Valentina Krysanova,et al.  Integrated assessment of cropland soil carbon sensitivity to recent and future climate in the Elbe River basin , 2008 .

[36]  Environmental Systems Renewable Fuel Standard: Potential Economic and Environmental Effects of U.S. Biofuel Policy , 2012 .

[37]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Efficient multi-objective calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model with parallel computing software in Python , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[38]  Anne Olhoff,et al.  The Emissions Gap Report 2013: A UNEP Synthesis Report , 2013 .

[39]  R. Lal,et al.  The potential of world cropland soils to sequester C and mitigate the greenhouse effect , 1999 .

[40]  Samuel Buis,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis measures the quality of parameter estimation: The case of soil parameters and a crop model , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[41]  T. A. Black,et al.  A model‐data intercomparison of CO2 exchange across North America: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis , 2010 .

[42]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest , 2013, Nature.

[43]  S. Ogle,et al.  Towards an integrated global framework to assess the impacts of land use and management change on soil carbon: current capability and future vision , 2012 .

[44]  Karen Updegraff,et al.  Estimating the uncertainty of modeled carbon sequestration: The GreenCertTM system , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[45]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Status of Automatic Calibration for Hydrologic Models: Comparison with Multilevel Expert Calibration , 1999 .

[46]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  Biomass supply from alternative cellulosic crops and crop residues: A spatially explicit bioeconomic modeling approach , 2011 .

[47]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using Genetic Algorithms and Bayesian Model Averaging , 2009 .

[48]  Jimmy R. Williams,et al.  Simulating soil C dynamics with EPIC: Model description and testing against long-term data , 2006 .

[49]  Roberto C. Izaurralde,et al.  Monitoring and Verifying Changes of Organic Carbon in Soil , 2001 .

[50]  A. Thomson,et al.  Climate Change Impacts for the Conterminous USA: An Integrated Assessment , 2005 .

[51]  V. Singh,et al.  The EPIC model. , 1995 .

[52]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[53]  K. Pearson VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents , 1895, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[54]  Craig C. Brandt,et al.  Regional uptake and release of crop carbon in the United States , 2011 .

[55]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  SWAT Ungauged: Hydrological Budget and Crop Yield Predictions in the Upper Mississippi River Basin , 2010 .

[56]  Roberto C. Izaurralde,et al.  Simulation study of soil organic matter dynamics as affected by land use and agricultural practices in semiarid Córdoba, Argentina , 2009 .

[57]  Daniel Cooley,et al.  Evaluating atmospheric CO2 inversions at multiple scales over a highly inventoried agricultural landscape , 2011, Global change biology.

[58]  C. Wirth,et al.  Reconciling Carbon-cycle Concepts, Terminology, and Methods , 2006, Ecosystems.

[59]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Cropland carbon fluxes in the United States: increasing geospatial resolution of inventory-based carbon accounting. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[60]  R. C. Izaurralde,et al.  Long-term modeling of soil C erosion and sequestration at the small watershed scale , 2007 .

[61]  A. Jakeman,et al.  How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall‐runoff model? , 1993 .

[62]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  Multi-scale geospatial agroecosystem modeling: a case study on the influence of soil data resolution on carbon budget estimates. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[63]  John M. Antle,et al.  Agriculture's role in greenhouse gas mitigation , 2007 .

[64]  Thomas A. Hennig,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2001, Digital Earth Moving.

[65]  Robert J. A. Jones,et al.  Will European soil‐monitoring networks be able to detect changes in topsoil organic carbon content? , 2008 .

[66]  John R. Williams,et al.  The EPIC crop growth model , 1989 .