Communicating and Controlling Strategy: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard

This paper reports evidence on the effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) as a strategy communication and management‐control device. This study first reviews communication and management control literatures that identify attributes of effective communication and control of strategy. Second, the study offers a model of communication and control applicable to the BSC. The study then analyzes empirical interview and archival data to model the use and assess the communication and control effectiveness of the BSC. The study includes data from multiple divisions of a large, international manufacturing company. Data are from BSC designers, administrators, and North American managers whose divisions are objects of the BSC. The study accumulates evidence regarding the challenges of designing and implementing the BSC faced by even a large, well‐funded company. These findings may be general‐izable to other companies adopting or considering adopting the BSC as a strategic and management control device. Data in...

[1]  Kelvin F. Cross,et al.  Measure Up!: Yardsticks for Continuous Improvement , 1991 .

[2]  Thomas Ahrens,et al.  Accounting and Organizations: Realizing the Richness of Field Research , 1998 .

[3]  R. Kaplan,et al.  PUTTING THE BALANCED SCORECARD TO WORK , 1993 .

[4]  Hanne Nørreklit.  The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard: A Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions , 2000 .

[5]  Ad Kleingeld,et al.  Multilevel design of performance measurement systems: enhancing strategic dialogue throughout the organization☆ , 1999 .

[6]  George Foster,et al.  Manufacturing overhead cost driver analysis , 1990 .

[7]  R. Barker,et al.  The Role of Communication in Creating and Maintaining a Learning Organization: Preconditions, Indicators, and Disciplines , 1998 .

[8]  A. Coffey,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: Technologies and Representations , 1996 .

[9]  K. E. Hughes.  The Value Relevance of Nonfinancial Measures of Air Pollution in the Electric Utility Industry , 2000 .

[10]  Mary L. Tucker,et al.  Organizational Communication: Development of Internal Strategic Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[11]  G. Meyer,et al.  Communicated Knowledge: A Learning Foundation , 2011 .

[12]  Sujatha Perera,et al.  Customer-focused manufacturing strategy and the use of operations-based non-financial performance measures: A research note , 1997 .

[13]  John P. Kotter,et al.  Why Transformation Efforts Fail , 1996 .

[14]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Judging probable cause. , 1986 .

[15]  E. Ziegel,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard , 1998 .

[16]  B. Lev,et al.  Value-Relevance of Nonfinancial Information: The Wireless Communications Industry , 1996 .

[17]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Estimation And Market Valuation Of Environmental Liabilities Relating To Superfund Sites , 1994 .

[18]  Antonio Davila,et al.  Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy: Text and Cases , 1999 .

[19]  William M. Cready.  Information Value and Investor Wealth: The Case of Earnings Announcements , 1988 .

[20]  David J. H. Watson,et al.  Transfer pricing: a behavioural context , 1975 .

[21]  Francine C. Mc Kenzie,et al.  Avoiding Performance Measurement Traps: , 1998 .

[22]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[23]  D. Larcker,et al.  Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications , 1998 .

[24]  D. Larcker,et al.  Quality strategy, strategic control systems, and organizational performance , 1997 .

[25]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation , 1984 .

[26]  R. Grant.  The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[27]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy , 1996 .

[28]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The strategy-focused organization , 2000 .

[29]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  An empirical analysis of manufacturing overhead cost drivers , 1995 .

[30]  R. Banker,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of an Incentive Plan that Includes Nonfinancial Performance Measures , 2000 .

[31]  H. Thomas Johnson,et al.  Relevance Regained: From Top-down Control to Bottom-up Empowerment , 1992 .

[32]  M. Abernethy,et al.  Management control systems in research and development organizations: The role of accounting, behavior and personnel controls , 1997 .

[33]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[34]  Anne M. Lillis,et al.  A framework for the analysis of interview data from multiple field research sites , 1999 .

[35]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard and Observability , 1979 .

[36]  David Ulrich,et al.  Organizational Capability: Competing from the Inside Out , 1990 .

[37]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[38]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[39]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Technical and Strategic Human Resource Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance , 1997 .

[40]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[41]  Thomas H. Johnson,et al.  Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting , 1987 .

[42]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  A field study of the impact of a performance-based incentive plan , 1996 .

[43]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Sensitivity, Precision, and Linear Aggregation of Signals for Performance Evaluation , 1989 .

[44]  Eric Flamholtz,et al.  The process of measurement in managerial accounting: A psycho-technical systems perspective , 1980 .

[45]  Richard A. Riley,et al.  Using Nonfinancial Information to Predict Financial Performance: The Case of the U.S. Airline Industry , 1999 .

[46]  Michael Goodman.  Corporate Communications For Executives , 1998 .

[47]  Wai Fong Chua,et al.  Doing Field Research: Practice and Meta-Theory in Counterpoint , 1998 .

[48]  Peter C. Brewer.  National culture and activity-based costing systems: a note , 1998 .

[49]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[50]  V. Govindarajan.  Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluation: An empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as an intervening variable☆ , 1984 .

[51]  Nigel Fielding,et al.  ‘Qualitative Data Analysis: Representations of a Technology: A Comment on Coffey, Holbrook and Atkinson’ , 1996 .

[52]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Linking control systems to business unit strategy: impact on performance , 1985 .

[53]  Anthony A. Atkinson,et al.  Standards for Field Research in Management Accounting , 1998 .

[54]  Kenneth A. Merchant,et al.  Rewarding results : motivating profit center managers , 1989 .

[55]  Steven E. Salterio,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Common and Unique Performance Measures , 2000 .

[56]  Robert F. Lusch,et al.  Outcome effect, controllability and performance evaluation of managers: some field evidence from multi-outlet businesses , 2000 .

[57]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[58]  D. Larcker,et al.  Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction , 1998 .

[59]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Analyzing the underlying dimensions of firm profitability , 1993 .

[60]  Ramji Balakrishnan,et al.  New directions in management accounting research , 1997 .