QTLs mapping for fruit size and shape in chromosomes 2 and 4 in pepper and a comparison of the pepper QTL map with that of tomato

Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping for fruit weight and shape in pepper (Capsicum spp.) was performed using C. chinense and C. frutescens introgression lines of chromosomes 2 and 4. In chromosome 2, a single major fruit-weight QTL, fw2.1, was detected in both populations that explained 62% of the trait variation. This QTL, as well as a fruit-shape QTL, fs2.1, which had a more minor effect, were localized to the tomato fruit-shape gene ovate. The cloned tomato fruit-weight QTL, fw2.2, did not play a major role in controlling fruit size variations in pepper. In chromosome 4, two fruit-weight QTLs, fw4.1 and fw4.2, were detected in the same genomic regions in both mapping populations. In addition, a single fruit-shape QTL was detected in each of the mapping populations that co-localized with one of the fruit-weight QTLs, suggesting pleiotropy or close linkage of the genes controlling size and shape. fw2.1 and fw4.2 represent major fruit-weight QTLs that are conserved in the three Capsicum species analyzed to date for fruit-size variations. Co-localization of the pepper QTLs with QTLs identified for similar traits in tomato suggests that the pepper and tomato QTLs are orthologous. Compared to fruit-shape QTLs, fruit-weight QTLs were more often conserved between pepper and tomato. This implies that different modes of selection were employed for these traits during domestication of the two Solanaceae species.

[1]  C. Elsik,et al.  Comparative Genomics of Plant Chromosomes , 2000, Plant Cell.

[2]  M. Daly,et al.  MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. , 1987, Genomics.

[3]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Identifying the loci responsible for natural variation in fruit size and shape in tomato , 1999, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[4]  E. Radwanski,et al.  Comparative genetics of disease resistance within the solanaceae. , 2000, Genetics.

[5]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Comparison of a set of allelic QTL-NILs for chromosome 4 of tomato: Deductions about natural variation and implications for germplasm utilization , 2001, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[6]  E. Fridman,et al.  Two tightly linked QTLs modify tomato sugar content via different physiological pathways , 2001, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[7]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Natural alleles at a tomato fruit size quantitative trait locus differ by heterochronic regulatory mutations , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  T. Rocheford,et al.  Dissection of Maize Kernel Composition and Starch Production by Candidate Gene Association , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[9]  I. Paran,et al.  Linkage of the A locus for the presence of anthocyanin and fs10.1, a major fruit-shape QTL in pepper , 2003, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[10]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Comparative fine mapping of fruit quality QTLs on chromosome 4 introgressions derived from two wild tomato species , 2004, Euphytica.

[11]  S. Tanksley.  The Genetic, Developmental, and Molecular Bases of Fruit Size and Shape Variation in Tomato , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[12]  M. Causse,et al.  Fine mapping of QTLs of chromosome 2 affecting the fruit architecture and composition of tomato , 2004, Molecular Breeding.

[13]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Dissecting the genetic pathway to extreme fruit size in tomato using a cross between the small-fruited wild species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium and L. esculentum var. Giant Heirloom. , 2001, Genetics.

[14]  R. Jansen,et al.  MapQTL 4.0: Software For The Calculation Of QTL Positions On Genetic Maps , 2000 .

[15]  S. Tanksley,et al.  A new class of regulatory genes underlying the cause of pear-shaped tomato fruit , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  T. C. Nesbitt,et al.  fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. , 2000, Science.

[17]  I. Paran,et al.  Mapping of yield-related QTLs in pepper in an interspecific cross of Capsicum annuum and C. frutescens , 2003, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[18]  J. Nelson.  QGENE: software for marker-based genomic analysis and breeding , 1997, Molecular Breeding.

[19]  T. Thorup,et al.  Candidate gene analysis of organ pigmentation loci in the Solanaceae. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  D. Zamir,et al.  An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. , 1995, Genetics.

[21]  G. Martin,et al.  High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. , 1992, Genetics.

[22]  K. Livingstone,et al.  Genome mapping in capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in the solanaceae. , 1999, Genetics.

[23]  S. Tanksley,et al.  A comparative genetic linkage map of eggplant (Solanum melongena) and its implications for genome evolution in the solanaceae. , 2002, Genetics.

[24]  I. Paran,et al.  fs3.1: a major fruit shape QTL conserved in Capsicum. , 2003, Genome.

[25]  R. Wijk,et al.  QTL mapping of fruit-related traits in pepper (Capsicum annuum) , 2001, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[26]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Conservation of gene function in the solanaceae as revealed by comparative mapping of domestication traits in eggplant. , 2002, Genetics.