The effect of macromolecular crowding on chaperonin-mediated protein folding.

The cylindrical chaperonin GroEL and its cofactor GroES mediate ATP-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Recent studies in vitro demonstrated that GroES binding to GroEL causes the displacement of unfolded polypeptide into the central volume of the GroEL cavity for folding in a sequestrated environment. Resulting native protein leaves GroEL upon GroES release, whereas incompletely folded polypeptide can be recaptured for structural rearrangement followed by another folding trial. Additionally, each cycle of GroES binding and dissociation is associated with the release of nonnative polypeptide into the bulk solution. Here we show that this loss of substrate from GroEL is prevented when the folding reaction is carried out in the presence of macromolecular crowding agents, such as Ficoll and dextran, or in a dense cytosolic solution. Thus, the release of nonnative polypeptide is not an essential feature of the productive chaperonin mechanism. Our results argue that conditions of excluded volume, thought to prevail in the bacterial cytosol, increase the capacity of the chaperonin to retain nonnative polypeptide throughout successive reaction cycles. We propose that the leakiness of the chaperonin system under physiological conditions is adjusted such that E. coli proteins are likely to complete folding without partitioning between different GroEL complexes. Polypeptides that are unable to fold on GroEL eventually will be transferred to other chaperones or the degradation machinery.

[1]  Neil A. Ranson,et al.  Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL–GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy , 1994, Nature.

[2]  A. Fersht,et al.  Toward a mechanism for GroEL.GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and -pulsed folding and annealing cage. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  S. Zimmerman,et al.  Estimation of macromolecule concentrations and excluded volume effects for the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonln GroEL at 2.8 Å , 1994, Nature.

[5]  S. B. Horowitz THE PERMEABILITY OF THE AMPHIBIAN OOCYTE NUCLEUS, IN SITU , 1972, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  F. Hartl,et al.  Binding of defined regions of a polypeptide to GroEL and its implications for chaperonin-mediated protein folding , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[7]  R. Ellis,et al.  Molecular chaperones: proteins essential for the biogenesis of some macromolecular structures. , 1989, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[8]  A. Clarke Molecular chaperones in protein folding and translocation. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[9]  W. Fenton,et al.  GroEL, GroES, and ATP-dependent folding and spontaneous assembly of ornithine transcarbamylase. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[10]  A. Minton,et al.  Macromolecular crowding: biochemical, biophysical, and physiological consequences. , 1993, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[11]  Yechezkel Kashi,et al.  GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms , 1994, Cell.

[12]  J. Weissman,et al.  Mechanism of GroEL action: Productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under groes , 1995, Cell.

[13]  J. Deisenhofer,et al.  The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution , 1996, Nature.

[14]  F. Hartl Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding , 1996, Nature.

[15]  K. Luby-Phelps,et al.  Physical properties of cytoplasm. , 1994, Current opinion in cell biology.

[16]  A. Colman,et al.  A highly efficient, cell-free translation/translocation system prepared from Xenopus eggs. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  F. Hartl,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of groEL through a 'molten globule'-like intermediate , 1991, Nature.

[18]  F. Hartl,et al.  Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL‐mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[19]  P. Høj,et al.  Generation of a stable folding intermediate which can be rescued by the chaperonins GroEL and GroES , 1994, FEBS letters.

[20]  J. Weissman,et al.  Release of both native and non-native proteins from a cis-only GroEL ternary complex , 1996, Nature.

[21]  Gage Martin Pass the Butter … , 1996, Science.

[22]  S. B. Horowitz,et al.  THE NUCLEAR PERMEABILITY, INTRACELLULAR DISTRIBUTION, AND DIFFUSION OF INULIN IN THE AMPHIBIAN OOCYTE , 1974, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  A. Minton,et al.  Holobiochemistry: the effect of local environment upon the equilibria and rates of biochemical reactions. , 1990, The International journal of biochemistry.

[24]  M. M. Bradford A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. , 1976, Analytical biochemistry.

[25]  F. Hartl,et al.  Protein folding in the cell: competing models of chaperonin function , 1996, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[26]  L. Stryer,et al.  Range of messenger action of calcium ion and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. , 1992, Science.

[27]  A. Fersht,et al.  Refolding of barnase in the presence of GroE. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  D. Taylor,et al.  Hindered diffusion of inert tracer particles in the cytoplasm of mouse 3T3 cells. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  A. Fulton,et al.  How crowded is the cytoplasm? , 1982, Cell.

[30]  S. Kowalczykowski,et al.  Enhancement of recA protein-promoted DNA strand exchange activity by volume-occupying agents. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[31]  A. Fersht,et al.  The folding of GroEL-bound barnase as a model for chaperonin-mediated protein folding. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. , 1994, Science.

[33]  J. Weissman,et al.  Characterization of the Active Intermediate of a GroEL–GroES-Mediated Protein Folding Reaction , 1996, Cell.

[34]  M. Klymkowsky,et al.  Morphogenesis and the cytoskeleton: studies of the Xenopus embryo. , 1994, Developmental biology.

[35]  S. Mande,et al.  Structure of the Heat Shock Protein Chaperonin-10 of Mycobacterium leprae , 1996, Science.

[36]  F. Hartl,et al.  Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL–GroES chaperonin complex , 1996, Nature.