Study of Hip Fracture Risk using Tree Structured Survival Analysis

In this paper we studied the risk of hip fracture for post-menopausal women by classifying women into different subgroups based on their risk of hip fracture. The subgroups were generated such that all the women in a particular subgroup had relatively similar risk while women belonging to two different subgroups had rather different risks of hip fracture. We used the Tree Structured Survival Analysis (TSSA) method to generate the subgroups based upon the cross-sectional data from 7,665 women enrolled in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF). All of these women had forearm, os calcis, hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. Time to hip fracture since BMD measurement was also recorded for these women and was treated as the outcome variable. A random sample consisting of 75 % (training data set) of women from the 7,665 available was used to generate the prognostic subgroups while the other 25 % (validation data set) was used to validate the results. Based on the training data set, TSSA identified four subgroups for whom the risk of hip fracture for an average of 6.5 years of follow-up was 19 %, 9 %, 4 % and 1%. The rules to generate the subgroups were based on BMD of Ward’s triangle, BMD of the os calcis, and BMD of the femoral neck, and age. We reproduced these results using the validation data set, showing the usefulness of the classification rules in a clinical setting. In conclusion, TSSA provided a useful, powerful and reproducible procedure for identification of meaningful prognostic subgroups based upon an individual woman’s age and BMD measurements. J Miner Stoffwechs 2003; 10: 11– 16.

[1]  C. Cooper,et al.  Physical activity, muscle strength, and calcium intake in fracture of the proximal femur in Britain. , 1988, BMJ.

[2]  H K Genant,et al.  Current methods and recent advances in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. , 1993, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  Mark R. Segal,et al.  Regression Trees for Censored Data , 1988 .

[4]  J. Madans,et al.  Anthropometric Indicators and Hip Fracture , 1989, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[5]  J. Davis,et al.  Predicting vertebral deformity using bone densitometry at various skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound. , 1995, Bone.

[6]  Statistical Issues in the Evaluation of Markers of HIV Progression , 1995 .

[7]  B. Henderson,et al.  Menopausal estrogen therapy and hip fractures. , 1982, Annals of internal medicine.

[8]  J. R. Koehler,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. , 1996 .

[9]  C C Glüer,et al.  Comparisons of Noninvasive Bone Mineral Measurements in Assessing Age‐Related Loss, Fracture Discrimination, and Diagnostic Classification , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  C. Slemenda,et al.  Choosing between predictors of fractures , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  S. Cummings,et al.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures , 1993, The Lancet.

[12]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[13]  S. Cummings,et al.  Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  J L Kelsey,et al.  Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. The Northeast Hip Fracture Study Group. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  M R Segal,et al.  A comparison of estimated proportional hazards models and regression trees. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  C. Slemenda,et al.  Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[17]  D. Bloch,et al.  Predictors of survival in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). , 1991, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .