Evidence for the development of concurrent processing in a sequential keypressing task

This paper describes an experiment that aimed at examining the effects of extended practice in a sequential keypressing task. More specifically, predictions of three execution model were tested. First, the classic subprogram-retrieval model (Sternberg et al., 1978) assumes that an action sequence is programmed entirely before sequence execution while later, during sequence execution, instructions for the individual units in the sequence are retrieved. It predicts that keypressing rate decreases with sequence length but specific effects of practice are not predicted. The second mechanism, concurrent processing, assumes that various forms of information processing become increasingly concurrent in the course of practice. More specifically, it is proposed that with practice motor programming and retrieval of individual motor units from a short-term motor buffer concur with actual keypressing which, however, may delay execution of individual actions. Finally, associative motor unitization asserts that sequence execution comes to rely to an increasing degree on the automatic spread of activation among representations of the individual sequence units so that keypressing rate increases with position in the sequence. These and other predictions were verified with a two-choice sequence production task. One sequence contained four, the other two keypresses. The main results are: (a) a reduction with practice of the difference between the times to initiate long and short sequences, (b) practice had a larger effect on final keypresses than on earlier keypresses, and (c) practice had a larger effect on the final keypress of the long than that of the short sequence. An interesting additional effect was the occurrence of a pronounced `warming-up? effect for all interkey intervals at the second and third day of practice. The results were taken as evidence for the development of concurrent programming and concurrent retrieval while little support was observed for associative motor utinization and subprogram-retrieval.

[1]  T. Carr,et al.  Automaticity in skill acquisition: Mechanisms for reducing interference in concurrent performance. , 1989 .

[2]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[3]  S. Portier,et al.  Practice and the dynamics of handwriting performance: evidence for a shift of motor programming load. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[5]  L. Shaffer.  Intention and performance. , 1976 .

[6]  A. Thomassen,et al.  Invariants in Handwriting: The Information Contained in a Motor Program , 1986 .

[7]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[8]  Hans-Leo Teulings,et al.  The Elementary Units of Programming in Handwriting , 1986 .

[9]  C. A. Terzuolo,et al.  Determinants and characteristics of motor patterns used for typing , 1980, Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Magill,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE EFFECT IN MOTOR SKILL ACQUISITION , 1990 .

[11]  D. Gentner.  Evidence Against a Central Control Model of Timing in Typing. , 1982 .

[12]  D A Rosenbaum,et al.  Scheduling and programming of rapid finger sequences: tests and elaborations of the hierarchical editor model. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  G. V. Galen,et al.  On the Simultaneous Processing of Words, Letters and Strokes in Handwriting: Evidence For a Mixed Linear and Parallel Model , 1986 .

[14]  J I Laszlo,et al.  Task complexity, accuracy, and reaction time. , 1977, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Programming in handwriting: Reaction time and movement time as a function of sequence length , 1983 .

[16]  I M Franks,et al.  Preprogramming vs. on-line control in simple movement sequences. , 1991, Acta psychologica.

[17]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Motor programming within a sequence of responses. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  David A. Rosenbaum,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and motor programming of manual response sequences , 1984 .

[19]  R. Pew.  Acquisition of hierarchical control over the temporal organization of a skill. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Levels of Motor Programming in Writing Familiar and Unfamiliar Symbols , 1988 .

[21]  M G Fischman,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Motor Behavior Influence of Extended Practice on Programming Time, Movement Time, and Transfer in Simple Target-striking Responses , 2022 .

[22]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[23]  Diana Eugenie Kornbrot.  Organisation of keying skills : the effect of motor complexity and number of units , 1989 .

[24]  Robert Gottsdanker,et al.  Studying reaction time with nonaging intervals: An effective procedure , 1986 .

[25]  C J Chamberlin,et al.  The memory representation of motor skills: a test of schema theory. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  D. G. MacKay.  The Problems of Flexibility, Fluency, and Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Skilled Behavior. , 1982 .

[27]  A. Thomassen,et al.  Preparation of partly precued handwriting movements: The size of movement units in handwriting , 1983 .

[28]  A Semjen,et al.  Distributed planning of movement sequences. , 1988, Journal of motor behavior.

[29]  S. Keele,et al.  The Structure of Motor Programs , 1976 .

[30]  F. M. Henry,et al.  Increased Response Latency for Complicated Movements and A “Memory Drum” Theory of Neuromotor Reaction , 1960 .

[31]  Wayne A. Wickelgran.  Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in (speech) behavior. , 1969 .

[32]  W. Verwey.  Effects of extended practice in a one-finger keypressing task. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[33]  D J Povel,et al.  Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[34]  D. Harrington,et al.  Programming sequences of hand postures. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[35]  Andras Semjen,et al.  Plan decoding and response timing during execution of movement sequences , 1992 .

[36]  C. I. Howarth,et al.  The Movement of the Hand towards a Target , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  Andras Semjen,et al.  The organization of rapid movement sequences as a function of sequence length , 1987 .

[38]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .