Description of nine nutrient loss models: capabilities and suitability based on their characteristics.

In EUROHARP, an EC Framework V project, which started in 2002 with 21 partners in 17 countries across Europe, a detailed intercomparison of contemporary catchment-scale modelling approaches was undertaken to characterise the relative importance of point and diffuse pollution of nutrients in surface freshwater systems. The study focused on the scientific evaluation of different modelling approaches, which were validated on three core catchments (the Ouse, UK; the Vansjo-Hobøl, Norway; and the Enza, Italy), and the application of each tool to three additional, randomly chosen catchments across Europe. The tools involved differ profoundly in their complexity, level of process representation and data requirements. The tools include simple loading models, statistical, conceptual and empirical model approaches, and physics-based (mechanistic) models. The results of a scientific intercomparison of the characteristics of these different model approaches are described. This includes an analysis of potential strengths and weaknesses of the nutrient models.

[1]  O. Schoumans,et al.  Review and Literature Evaluation of Quantification Tools for the Assessment of Nutrient Losses at Catchment Scale , 2003 .

[2]  Maja Brandt,et al.  Modelling nitrogen transport and retention in the catchments of southern Sweden , 1998 .

[3]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[4]  Piet Groenendijk,et al.  Prediction of nitrogen and phosphorus leaching to groundwater and surface waters; process descriptions of the animo4.0 model , 2005 .

[5]  B. Arheimer,et al.  Nitrogen concentrations simulated with HBV-N: New response function and calibration strategy , 2001 .

[6]  S. Anthony,et al.  Nitrogen and phosphorus retention in surface waters: an inter-comparison of predictions by catchment models of different complexity. , 2009, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[7]  V. Singh,et al.  Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology , 1995 .

[8]  B Grizzetti,et al.  Ensemble modelling of nutrient loads and nutrient load partitioning in 17 European catchments. , 2009, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[9]  N. Caraco,et al.  HUMAN IMPACT ON NITRATE EXPORT : AN ANALYSIS USING MAJOR WORLD RIVERS , 1999 .

[10]  Nitrogen source apportionment : a comparison between a dynamic and a statistical model , 1999 .

[11]  Markus Hoffmann,et al.  SOILNDB: a decision support tool for assessing nitrogen leaching losses from arable land , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  S. Anthony,et al.  Evaluation of diffuse pollution model applications in EUROHARP catchments with limited data. , 2009, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[13]  Per Stålnacke,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF RIVERINE LOADS OF POLLUTANTS , 1996 .

[14]  Steven G. Anthony,et al.  MAGPIE: A modelling framework for evaluating nitrate losses at national and catchment scales , 2000 .

[15]  S. Anthony,et al.  Evaluation of the difference of eight model applications to assess diffuse annual nutrient losses from agricultural land. , 2009, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[16]  Subannual models for catchment management: evaluating model performance on three European catchments. , 2009, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.