Integration of system-level optimization with concurrent engineering using parametric subsystem modeling

The introduction of concurrent design practices to the aerospace industry has greatly increased the efficiency and productivity of engineers during design sessions. Teams that are well-versed in such practices such as JPL’s Team X are able to thoroughly examine a trade space and develop a family of reliable point designs for a given mission in a matter of weeks compared to the months or years sometimes needed for traditional design. Simultaneously, advances in computing power have given rise to a host of potent numerical optimization methods capable of solving complex multidisciplinary optimization problems containing hundreds of variables, constraints, and governing equations. Unfortunately, such methods are tedious to set up and require significant amounts of time and processor power to execute, thus making them unsuitable for rapid concurrent engineering use. In some ways concurrent engineering and automated system-level optimization are often viewed as being mutually incompatible. It is therefore desirable to devise a system to allow concurrent engineering teams to take advantage of these powerful techniques without hindering the teams’ performance. This paper proposes such an integration by using parametric approximations of the subsystem models. These approximations are then linked to a system-level optimizer that is capable of reaching a solution more quickly than normally possible due to the reduced complexity of the approximations. The integration structure is described in detail and applied to a standard problem in aerospace engineering. Further, a comparison is made between this application and traditional concurrent engineering through an experimental trial with two groups each using a different method to solve the standard problem. Each method is evaluated in terms of optimizer accuracy, time to solution, and ease of use. The results suggest that system-level optimization, running as a background process during integrated concurrent engineering, is potentially advantageous as long as it is judiciously implemented from a mathematical and organizational perspective. Thesis Supervisor: Olivier L. de Weck Title: Assistant Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and of Engineering Systems

[1]  D. Miller,et al.  Development of the quantitative generalized information network analysis (GINA) methodology for satellite systems , 1999, 1999 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.99TH8403).

[2]  Sobieszczanski Jaroslaw,et al.  Advancement of Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS) , 2000 .

[3]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  Space Systems Flexibility Provided by On-Orbit Servicing: Part 2 , 2002 .

[4]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Collaborative optimization: an architecture for large-scale distributed design , 1996 .

[5]  J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Bilevel Integrated System Synthesis for Concurrent and Distributed Processing , 2002 .

[6]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Architecting a family of space tugs based on orbital transfer mission scenarios , 2003 .

[7]  Richard J. Balling,et al.  Collaborative optimization with disciplinary conceptual design , 1998 .

[8]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  New Methods for Rapid Architecture Selection and Conceptual Design , 2004 .

[9]  Sobieszczanski Jaroslaw,et al.  Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS) , 1998 .

[10]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Collaborative optimization using response surface estimation , 1998 .

[11]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Development of the Quantitative Generalized Information Network Analysis Methodology for Satellite Systems , 2001 .

[12]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1997 .

[13]  Howard B. Demuth,et al.  Neutral network toolbox for use with Matlab , 1995 .

[14]  Hugh McManus,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE ORBITAL TRANSFER VEHICLE TRADE SPACE , 2003 .

[15]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Implementation and Performance Issues in Collaborative Optimization , 1996 .

[16]  Richard J. Balling,et al.  Collaborative optimization with disciplinary conceptual design , 2000 .

[17]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Evaluating the Cost and Risk Impacts of Launch Choices , 2004 .

[18]  James F. Cox,et al.  Project Freebird: An orbital transfer vehicle , 1994 .

[19]  K. Schittkowski,et al.  NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING , 2022 .

[20]  J. Neyman.  Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability , 1951 .

[21]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration as Front End for Effective Space System Design , 2004 .

[22]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Bi-level integrated system synthesis with response surfaces , 1999 .

[23]  Gerald B. Folland,et al.  Other References , 1965, Comparative Education Review.

[24]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Supersonic Business Jet Design Through Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis , 1999 .

[25]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[26]  Robert A. Richards,et al.  Zeroth-order shape optimization utilizing a learning classifier system , 1996 .

[27]  D. Jackson,et al.  The theory of approximation , 1982 .

[28]  D. P. Thunnissen,et al.  Icemaker/sup TM/: an excel-based environment for collaborative design , 2003, 2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8652).

[29]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Collaborative optimization using response surface estimation , 1998 .

[30]  J. A. Aguilar,et al.  Scope vs. detail: the teams of the Concept Design Center , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[31]  Hugh McManus,et al.  Creating Advanced Architecture for Space Systems: Emergent Lessons from New Processes , 2004 .

[32]  Jaroslaw,et al.  AIAA 2002-5409 Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS) for Concurrent and Distributed Processing , 2022 .

[33]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .