Motion sickness in public road transport: the effect of driver, route and vehicle.

Relationships between vehicle motion and passenger sickness have been investigated in a survey of 3256 passengers travelling on 56 mainland UK bus or coach journeys. Vehicle motion was measured throughout all journeys, yielding over 110 h of six-axis coach motion data from five types of coach and 17 different drivers. Overall, 28.4% of passengers reported feelings of illness, 12.8% reported nausea and 1.7% reported vomiting during coach travel. Passenger nausea and illness ratings increased with increased exposure to lateral coach motion at low frequencies (< 0.5 Hz). Motion in other axes correlated less well with sickness, although there were some intercorrelations between the motions in the different axes. Sickness levels among passengers were greater with drivers who drove to produce higher average magnitudes of fore-and-aft and lateral vehicle motion. Nausea occurrence was greater on routes classified as being predominantly cross-country where magnitudes of lateral vehicle motion were significantly higher. Lateral motion and motion sickness increased from the front to the rear of each vehicle. No significant differences in sickness were found between the five different vehicle types used in the study. The applicability of a motion sickness dose model to these data is discussed.

[1]  C. Oman A heuristic mathematical model for the dynamics of sensory conflict and motion sickness. , 1982, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[2]  J F Golding,et al.  The effects of motion direction, body axis, and posture on motion sickness induced by low frequency linear oscillation. , 1995, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[3]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Handbook of Human Vibration , 1990 .

[4]  C. Oman,et al.  Motion sickness: a synthesis and evaluation of the sensory conflict theory. , 1990, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[5]  S. J. Alexander,et al.  Wesleyan University Studies of Motion Sickness: VI. Prediction of Sickness on a Vertical Accelerator by Means of a Motion Sickness History Questionnaire , 1945 .

[6]  M J Griffin,et al.  Motion sickness in public road transport: passenger behavior and susceptibility. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[7]  Michael E. McCauley,et al.  MOTION SICKNESS INCIDENCE: EXPLORATORY STUDIES OF HABITUATION, PITCH AND ROLL, AND THE REFINEMENT OF A MATHEMATICAL MODEL , 1976 .

[8]  Golding Jf,et al.  Effect of frequency of horizontal linear oscillation on motion sickness and somatogravic illusion. , 1996 .

[9]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF SHIP MOTION , 1980 .

[10]  S Krafczyk,et al.  [Visual prevention from motion sickness in cars]. , 1982, Archiv fur Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.

[11]  M J Griffin,et al.  Prediction of the incidence of motion sickness from the magnitude, frequency, and duration of vertical oscillation. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for grading the severity of acute motion sickness. , 1968, Aerospace medicine.

[13]  M. J. Griffin,et al.  5 – Whole-body Vibration and Health , 1990 .

[14]  Rodger J. Koppa,et al.  Driver Inputs during Emergency or Extreme Vehicle Maneuvers , 1976 .

[15]  R. Lubow,et al.  Why is the driver rarely motion sick? The role of controllability in motion sickness. , 1991, Ergonomics.