On the origin of auxiliary do

Prevailing theories link the English periphrastic auxiliary verb do historically with Old and Middle English causative do. I argue that these and other accounts are inconsistent with modern dialect evidence and an analysis of the historical record suggested by that evidence. The primary source of periphrastic do was a habitual aspect marker which itself arose from the reinterpretation of bare object nominalizations as infinitive verbs. 1

[1]  David R. Dowty.  On the Semantic Content of the Notion of ‘Thematic Role’ , 1989 .

[2]  M. Wakelin,et al.  English Dialects: An Introduction , 1972 .

[3]  Angus Cameron,et al.  The Dictionary of Old English , 2012 .

[4]  On the origin and early development of the auxiliary do , 1938 .

[5]  M. Mithun.  The evolution of noun incorporation , 1984 .

[6]  W. Wurff.  Syntactic Variability, Borrowing, and Innovation , 1992 .

[7]  Jeffrey P. Williams.  The Development of Aspectual Markers in Anglo-Caribbean English , 1988 .

[8]  Sally Mcconnell-Ginet.  ADVERBS AND LOGICAL FORM: A LINGUISTICALLY REALISTIC THEORY , 1982 .

[9]  S. Wright.  ON THE STYLISTIC BASIS OF SYNTACTIC CHANGE , 1989 .

[10]  Marcia C. Linebarger,et al.  Negative polarity and grammatical representation , 1987 .

[11]  Renaat Declerck,et al.  The manifold interpretations of generic sentences , 1986 .

[12]  Ian Roberts,et al.  Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A Comparative History of English and French , 1993 .

[13]  Mícheál Ó Siadhail.  Modern Irish: Grammatical Structure and Dialectal Variation , 1990 .

[14]  John Harris.  Expanding the Superstrate: Habitual Aspect Markers in Atlantic Englishes , 1986 .

[15]  Laurel J. Brinton,et al.  Aspectuality and countability: a cross-categorial analogy , 1998, English Language and Linguistics.

[16]  Laurence R. Horn.  A Natural History of Negation , 1989 .

[17]  Ann Arbor,et al.  English as a World Language , 1982 .

[18]  A. Kroch.  Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change , 1989, Language Variation and Change.

[19]  Robert Dixon,et al.  A Grammar of Boumaa Fijian , 1977 .

[20]  J. Simpson,et al.  The Oxford English Dictionary , 1884 .

[21]  Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade,et al.  Towards a standard English, 1600-1800 , 1993 .

[22]  John Harris,et al.  Syntactic variation and dialect divergence , 1984, Journal of Linguistics.

[23]  T. Eythórsson.  Functional Categories, Cliticization, and Verb Movement in the Early Germanic Languages , 1996 .

[24]  Studies Presented to Robert B. Lees by His Students. Papers in Linguistics. , 1970 .

[25]  Francis Jeffry Pelletier,et al.  The Generic book , 1997 .

[26]  Semantic aspects of syntactic change , 1991 .

[27]  W. Preusler.  Keltischer Einfluß im Englischen. , 1938, Indogermanische Forschungen.

[28]  Raymond Hickey,et al.  Language History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on His 60th Birthday , 1999 .

[29]  P. Trudgill.  Dialects in contact , 1986 .

[30]  Terence Parsons,et al.  Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics , 1990 .

[31]  J. Fisiak.  Historical semantics, historical word-formation , 1985 .

[32]  R. Allen.  King Horn : an edition based on Cambridge University Library MS. Gg. 4.27(2) , 1984 .

[33]  Internal and external factors in syntactic change , 1992 .

[34]  Stephen J. Williams,et al.  A Welsh grammar , 1980 .

[35]  D. Evans.  A grammar of middle Welsh , 1964 .

[36]  Thomas b. Miller.  The old English version of Bede's Ecclesiastical history of the English people , 1892 .

[37]  John Braidwood,et al.  An Anglo-Irish Dialect of North Roscommon , 1958 .

[38]  David Denison,et al.  English historical syntax : verbal constructions , 1994 .

[39]  Damian G. Sohl,et al.  Ponapean-English Dictionary , 1979 .

[40]  Donka Minkova,et al.  The History of Final Vowels in English: The Sound of Muting , 1991 .

[41]  P. Chantraine.  La formation des noms en grec ancien , 1934 .

[42]  M. Rissanen.  Periphrastic Do in Affirmative Statements in Early American English , 1985 .

[43]  Bruce Mitchell,et al.  Old English Syntax , 1985 .

[44]  Deborah Schiffrin,et al.  Language change and variation , 1989 .

[45]  F. Morgan.  English dialect dictionary , 1944 .

[46]  R. Hinderling.  Studien zu den starken Verbalabstrakta des Germanischen , 1967 .

[47]  A. Ellegård.  The auxiliary do : the establishment and regulation of its use in English , 1955 .

[48]  Irma Taavitsainen,et al.  History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics , 1992 .

[49]  Lawrence D. Carrington,et al.  Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity , 1985 .

[50]  J. Rickford.  Social Contact and Linguistic Diffusion: Hiberno-English and New World Black English , 1986 .

[51]  The Rise of Auxiliary DO‐Verb Raising or Category‐Strengthening? , 1997 .

[52]  Frederik Theodoor Visser,et al.  An Historical Syntax of the English Language , 2002 .

[53]  Sylvia Adamson.  Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics : Cambridge, 6-9 April 1987 , 1990 .

[54]  Martyn F. Wakelin,et al.  The Southwest of England , 1986 .

[55]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  The Logic of Decision and Action , 1967 .

[56]  Juhani Klemola,et al.  Periphrastic DO in South-Western Dialects of British English: A Reassessment , 1994 .

[57]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[58]  C. Allen.  Middle English case loss and the ‘creolization’ hypothesis , 1997, English Language and Linguistics.

[59]  Randolph Quirk,et al.  Middle English dictionary , 1954 .

[60]  Merrill B. Hintikka,et al.  Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events , 1986 .

[61]  S. Thompson,et al.  The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar , 1984 .

[62]  John Holm,et al.  Pidgins and Creoles , 1991 .

[63]  Ian Roberts,et al.  Clause structure and language change , 1995 .

[64]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Properties, types and meaning , 1988 .

[65]  Jared S. Klein,et al.  Die Morphologie des urgermanischen Nomens , 1991 .

[66]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World , 1994 .

[67]  Dieter Kastovsky,et al.  Historical English syntax , 1991 .

[68]  Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al.  A History of English Syntax , 1971 .

[69]  Anthony S. Kroch,et al.  Function and grammar in the history of English , 1989 .

[70]  David R. Dowty.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in M , 1979 .

[71]  Joseph Wright,et al.  Old English Grammar , 1955 .

[72]  Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade,et al.  The Origin and Development of Periphrastic Auxiliary do: A Case of Destigmatisation , 1990 .

[73]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[74]  Samuel David Epstein,et al.  Studies in comparative Germanic syntax , 1995 .

[75]  Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade.  The Auxiliary Do in Eighteenth-Century English: A Sociohistorical Linguistic Approach , 1987 .

[76]  Damian G. Sohl,et al.  Ponapean Reference Grammar , 1981 .

[77]  Jay H. Jasanoff.  Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics , 1988 .