Emergency department utilization by patients with gynecologic cancer in the United States

Introduction Payment reform will give oncologists increasing responsibility for how patients with cancer meet unexpected care needs. Objective To differentiate how patients with gynecologic cancers use emergency care, and to assess the characteristics associated with potentially avoidable treat-and-release visits. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, a stratified sample of visits in United States hospital-based emergency departments, from 2010 to 2014. Visits by patients with a diagnosis of gynecologic cancer were selected. Sample weights were applied to calculate national estimates of care patterns and trends. Associations with treat-and-release disposition were assessed with weighted logistic regression. Results In the study period, patients with gynecologic cancer made an estimated 370 104 annual emergency department visits (95% CI 351 997 to 388 211). A total of 50.2% of patients were treated and released, 48% were admitted, 1.6% were transferred, and 0.1% died. These visits corresponded to over US$1.27 billion in annual charges, with an average charge of US$3428 per visit (95% CI 3348 to 3509). Driven by growing treat-and-release utilization, annual visits increased, while admission rates fell over time. Patients with cervical cancer represented the plurality (36%) of visits; they were relatively younger, of lower socioeconomic status, and had fewer co-morbidities. Models for treat-and-release disposition did not vary significantly across different cancer populations. In the all-cancer model, increased odds of treat-and-release disposition was associated with cervical cancer diagnosis, younger age, lesser Elixhauser co-morbidity, Medicare coverage (OR=1.19; p<0.001), Medicaid coverage (OR=1.25; p<0.001), uninsured status (OR=1.70; p<0.001), and weekend visits. Visits in the northeast, at urban hospitals, and in winter months showed decreased odds of treat-and-release disposition. Discussion Patients with gynecologic cancers have been using the emergency department at increasing rates, primarily driven by treat-and-release visits that did not result in admission or death. Patients with cervical cancer have higher rates of treat-and-release utilization and may over-use emergency department care.

[1]  A. Haggerty,et al.  Treat-and-Release Emergency Department Utilization by Patients With Gynecologic Cancers. , 2019, Journal of oncology practice.

[2]  L. Richardson,et al.  Trends in Emergency Department Visits and Admission Rates Among US Acute Care Hospitals , 2018, JAMA internal medicine.

[3]  S. Schleicher,et al.  Alternative payment and care‐delivery models in oncology: A systematic review , 2018, Cancer.

[4]  Jason D. Wright,et al.  Society of Gynecologic Oncology Future of Physician Payment Reform Task Force report: The Endometrial Cancer Alternative Payment Model (ECAP). , 2018, Gynecologic oncology.

[5]  L. Schuchter,et al.  Best Practices for Reducing Unplanned Acute Care for Patients With Cancer. , 2018, Journal of oncology practice.

[6]  Howard R. Underwood,et al.  Comparing Utilization and Costs of Care in Freestanding Emergency Departments, Hospital Emergency Departments, and Urgent Care Centers , 2017, Annals of emergency medicine.

[7]  D. Kyriacou,et al.  Trends in Adult Cancer–Related Emergency Department Utilization: An Analysis of Data From the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[8]  D. Seaberg,et al.  Patient Navigation for Patients Frequently Visiting the Emergency Department: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2017, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[9]  L. Havrilesky,et al.  Development of an alternative payment model (APM) for endometrial cancer: Opportunities to reduce cost and improve quality , 2017 .

[10]  C. Cross-Barnet,et al.  Innovative Oncology Care Models Improve End-Of-Life Quality, Reduce Utilization And Spending. , 2017, Health affairs.

[11]  Z. Obermeyer,et al.  The Emergency Care of Patients With Cancer: Setting the Research Agenda. , 2016, Annals of emergency medicine.

[12]  Hannah Hamavid,et al.  Assessing the Complex and Evolving Relationship between Charges and Payments in US Hospitals: 1996 – 2012 , 2016, PloS one.

[13]  J. Weese,et al.  Implementation of treatment pathways in a large integrated health care system , 2016 .

[14]  E. Bruera,et al.  Avoidable and unavoidable visits to the emergency department among patients with advanced cancer receiving outpatient palliative care. , 2015, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[15]  N. Rathlev,et al.  The Affordable Care Act and emergency care. , 2014, American journal of public health.

[16]  E. Kreys,et al.  Impact of cancer supportive care pathways compliance on emergency department visits and hospitalizations. , 2014, Journal of oncology practice.

[17]  Katherine Baicker,et al.  Medicaid Increases Emergency-Department Use: Evidence from Oregon's Health Insurance Experiment , 2014, Science.

[18]  Mark Hachey,et al.  Cancer Survivors in the United States: Prevalence across the Survivorship Trajectory and Implications for Care , 2013, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[19]  Jesse M. Pines,et al.  National Trends in Emergency Department Use, Care Patterns, and Quality of Care of Older Adults in the United States , 2013, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[20]  M. Harrison,et al.  Emergency department visits for symptoms experienced by oncology patients: a systematic review , 2012, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[21]  Ralph Gonzales,et al.  Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997-2007. , 2010, JAMA.

[22]  R. Mutter,et al.  Emergency department care in the United States: a profile of national data sources. , 2010, Annals of emergency medicine.

[23]  V. N. Slee,et al.  The International Classification of Diseases: ninth revision (ICD-9) , 1978, Annals of internal medicine.

[24]  A. Holland,et al.  Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit , 2013 .

[25]  K. George ACOG COMMITTEE OPINION , 2022 .