Compatibilization strategies for PLA biocomposites: a comparative study between extrusion-injection and dry blending-compression molding

ABSTRACT In this work, PLA biocomposites were prepared by two different processing methods to evaluate two coupling agents: maleic anhydride grafted PLA (MA-g-PLA) and glycidyl methacrylate grafted PLA (GMA-g-PLA). Coupling agents were directly incorporated during extrusion before injection molding and through fiber surface treatment before dry-blending (DB) and compression molding. The biocomposites morphology was more homogeneous and with fewer voids using both coupling agents due to a better adhesion. The processing method influenced the coupling efficiency and determined the biocomposites properties. Tensile strength decreased with the agave fibers incorporation to a larger extent in DB-compression molding (from 47 to 34 MPa) than in extrusion-injection (from 55 to 51 MPa) due to the high level of compaction and dispersion achieved with high shear rate. Tensile strength was improved with both surface treatments in DB-compressed samples, while in the extrusion-injected materials, this property increased up to 67 and 59 MPa with GMA-g-PLA and MA-g-PLA, being even higher than the neat PLA. However, the excess of the coupling agent could affect its stiffness. The hydrophobic coating deposited on the surface reduced fibers hydrophilicity, and water diffusivity decreased due to a more compact internal structure, resulting in water absorption lower than 15% in all cases. Graphical abstract

[1]  D. Rodrigue,et al.  Biodegradability and improved mechanical performance of polyhydroxyalkanoates/agave fiber biocomposites compatibilized by different strategies , 2020 .

[2]  A. A. Pérez-Fonseca,et al.  Accelerated Weathering of Polylactic Acid/Agave Fiber Biocomposites and the Effect of Fiber–Matrix Adhesion , 2020, Journal of Polymers and the Environment.

[3]  P. Longhurst,et al.  Fabrication of agave tequilana bagasse/PLA composite and preliminary mechanical properties assessment , 2020 .

[4]  L. Peponi,et al.  Fiber-matrix interface improvement via glycidyl methacrylate compatibilization for rotomolded poly(lactic acid)/agave fiber biocomposites , 2020 .

[5]  S. Barnabé,et al.  PLA/flax fiber bio-composites: effect of polyphenol-based surface treatment on interfacial adhesion and durability , 2020 .

[6]  M. E. González-López,et al.  Accelerated weathering of poly(lactic acid) and its biocomposites: A review , 2020 .

[7]  Qinglin Wu,et al.  Effects of Methylenediphenyl 4,4’-Diisocyanate and Maleic Anhydride as Coupling Agents on the Properties of Polylactic Acid/Polybutylene Succinate/Wood Flour Biocomposites by Reactive Extrusion , 2020, Materials.

[8]  Abhijit Sudamrao Getme,et al.  A Review: Bio-fiber’s as reinforcement in composites of polylactic acid (PLA) , 2020 .

[9]  V. Chaudhary,et al.  Static and dynamic mechanical properties of PLA bio-composite with hybrid reinforcement of flax and jute , 2020 .

[10]  Tshai Kim Yeow,et al.  Effect of coupling agent content on properties of composites made from polylactic acid and chrysanthemum waste , 2019, Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology.

[11]  Danying Zuo,et al.  Mechanical, Biodegradation and Morphological Properties of Sisal Fiber Reinforced Poly(Lactic Acid) Biocomposites , 2019, Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part B.

[12]  M. Rejab,et al.  Effect of Maleated Anhydride on Mechanical Properties of Rice Husk Filler Reinforced PLA Matrix Polymer Composite , 2019, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology.

[13]  Kazushi Yamada,et al.  Effect of surface treatment of cellulose fiber (CF) on durability of PLA/CF bio-composites. , 2019, Carbohydrate polymers.

[14]  Guravtar Singh Mann,et al.  Green composites: A review of processing technologies and recent applications , 2018, Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials.

[15]  D. Rodrigue,et al.  Polylactic acid–agave fiber biocomposites produced by rotational molding: A comparative study with compression molding , 2018 .

[16]  D. Rodrigue,et al.  Effect of Maleated PLA on the Properties of Rotomolded PLA-Agave Fiber Biocomposites , 2018, Journal of Polymers and the Environment.

[17]  D. Rodrigue,et al.  Effect of surface treatment on the physical and mechanical properties of injection molded poly(lactic acid)‐coir fiber biocomposites , 2018, Polymer Composites.

[18]  S. Bajwa,et al.  Compatibilization Improves Performance of Biodegradable Biopolymer Composites Without Affecting UV Weathering Characteristics , 2018, Journal of Polymers and the Environment.

[19]  Zhao Qin,et al.  Study on the Pre-Treatment, Physical and Chemical Properties of Ramie Fibers Reinforced Poly (Lactic Acid) (PLA) Biocomposite , 2018 .

[20]  K. Sheng,et al.  Improved properties of PLA biocomposites toughened with bamboo cellulose nanowhiskers through silane modification , 2018, Journal of Materials Science.

[21]  S. Bajwa,et al.  Compatibilization improves physico-mechanical properties of biodegradable biobased polymer composites , 2018 .

[22]  Shanshan Lv,et al.  Properties of grafted wood flour filled poly (lactic acid) composites by reactive extrusion , 2018 .

[23]  J. A. Silva-Guzmán,et al.  Polylactic acid functionalization with maleic anhydride and its use as coupling agent in natural fiber biocomposites: a review , 2018 .

[24]  S. Rugmai,et al.  Crystallization behavior studied by synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering of poly (lactic acid)/cellulose nanofibers composites , 2017 .

[25]  I. Singh,et al.  Processing of PLA/sisal fiber biocomposites using direct- and extrusion-injection molding , 2017 .

[26]  Hao Wang,et al.  Glycidyl methacrylate-compatibilized poly(lactic acid)/hemp hurd biocomposites: Processing, crystallization, and thermo-mechanical response , 2017 .

[27]  D. Rodrigue,et al.  Effect of fiber content and surface treatment on the mechanical properties of natural fiber composites produced by rotomolding , 2017 .

[28]  L. Jaramillo,et al.  Bio-based composites from agricultural wastes: Polylactic acid and bamboo Guadua angustifolia , 2016 .

[29]  S. Mohanty,et al.  Weathering and Biodegradation Study on Graft Copolymer Compatibilized Hybrid Bionanocomposites of Poly(Lactic Acid) , 2016, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

[30]  Shanshan Lv,et al.  Modification of wood flour/PLA composites by reactive extrusion with maleic anhydride , 2016 .

[31]  S. Mohanty,et al.  Effect of poly (lactic acid)‐graft‐glycidyl methacrylate as a compatibilizer on properties of poly (lactic acid)/banana fiber biocomposites , 2016 .

[32]  Y. Ruksakulpiwat,et al.  Glycidyl Methacrylate Grafted Polylactic Acid: Morphological Properties and Crystallization Behavior , 2015 .

[33]  D. Kurniawan,et al.  Towards improving mechanical properties of basalt fiber/polylactic acid composites by fiber surface treatments , 2015 .

[34]  Yan Li,et al.  Study on short ramie fiber/poly(lactic acid) composites compatibilized by maleic anhydride , 2014 .

[35]  Yunxuan Weng,et al.  Characterization of interfacial compatibility of polylactic acid and bamboo flour (PLA/BF) in biocomposites , 2014 .

[36]  M. Farsi Wood-plastic composites: influence of wood flour chemical modification on the mechanical performance , 2010 .

[37]  J. Müssig,et al.  Fibre matrix adhesion of natural fibres cotton, flax and hemp in polymeric matrices analyzed with the single fibre fragmentation test , 2008 .

[38]  K. G. Kibler,et al.  Langmuir-Type Model for Anomalous Moisture Diffusion In Composite Resins , 1978 .