Automated behavioural response assessment to a feeding event in two heritage chicken breeds

Abstract Video was recorded for three consecutive days for two pens each of two breeds of heritage chickens, Rhode Island Red (RIR) and Barred Plymouth Rock (BPR) (34 birds/pen), before and following a feeding event. The feeding event occurred when a technician entered the pen to refill the food trough at 08:00 daily. Changes in overall activity were assessed using a software-based automated quantitative method, and changes in mobility, resting, comfort and feeding behaviour were scored manually. With the software method, activity was determined for 30 min pre- and post-feeding event, and was defined as the percent pixel change of the total arena per 30 s (a change in one pixel indicated a change in the use of an area of ∼0.69 cm 2 ). Video recordings were also scan-sampled by a human observer every 30 s for 15 min pre- and post-feeding event, and behaviours were scored according to an ethogram. The ethogram data tended to support the findings of the automated analysis. Activity levels increased before and were at their highest following the feeding event. Breed differences were apparent, as BPR were more active but reduced activity faster than RIR. Resting, ground pecking and comfort behaviour were decreased post-feeding event for both breeds. Feather pecking was more prominent in RIR, but did not differ before or after the feeding event. In this study we have shown that an automated, software-based behavioural assessment method can be applied to chickens, and it is capable of detecting subtle changes in activity. In future, use of such an automated method has application in production systems in its ability to serve as an early warning system of health concerns by finding deviations from baseline activity.

[1]  J D Delius,et al.  Preening and Associated Comfort Behavior in Birds a , 1988, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  I. Estevez,et al.  Space use according to the distribution of resources and level of competition. , 2008, Poultry science.

[3]  T. Rodenburg,et al.  Use of dynamic and rewarding environmental enrichment to alleviate feather pecking in non-cage laying hens , 2014 .

[4]  E. Decuypere,et al.  Effect of fasting and feeding time on circadian rhythms of serum thyroid hormone concentrations, glucose, liver monodeiodinase activity and rectal temperature in growing chickens , 1984 .

[5]  H. Piepho,et al.  Genetic parameters for feather pecking and aggressive behavior in a large F2-cross of laying hens using generalized linear mixed models. , 2014, Poultry science.

[6]  B. Spruijt,et al.  Temporal and sequential structure of behavior and facility usage of laying hens in an enriched environment. , 2005, Poultry science.

[7]  R. C. Newberry.  Exploratory behaviour of young domestic fowl , 1999 .

[8]  M. Dawkins,et al.  Optical flow, flock behaviour and chicken welfare , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  I. Barr,et al.  A Novel Video Tracking Method to Evaluate the Effect of Influenza Infection and Antiviral Treatment on Ferret Activity , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  C. Nicol,et al.  A bespoke management package can reduce levels of injurious pecking in loose-housed laying hen flocks , 2013, Veterinary Record.

[11]  B. L. Nielsen,et al.  Effects of qualitative and quantitative feed restriction on the activity of broiler chickens , 2003 .

[12]  J. Diamond,et al.  METABOLIC AND DIGESTIVE RESPONSES TO ARTIFICIAL SELECTION IN CHICKENS , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  J. Hurnik,et al.  An ethogram of White Leghorn-type hens in battery cages. , 1990 .

[14]  George P. Chrousos,et al.  Mechanisms of stress: A dynamic overview of hormonal and behavioral homeostasis , 1992, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[15]  P. Jensen,et al.  Domestication effects on foraging strategies in fowl. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[16]  Cécile Cornou,et al.  Automatic detection of deviations in activity levels in groups of broiler chickens – A pilot study , 2011 .

[17]  M. Pagel,et al.  Peck orders and group size in laying hens: `futures contracts' for non-aggression , 1997, Behavioural Processes.

[18]  P. Hemsworth,et al.  Fear of humans and its relationships with productivity in laying hens at commercial farms. , 1992, British poultry science.

[19]  Janice M. Siegford,et al.  When continuous observations just won’t do: Developing accurate and efficient sampling strategies for the laying hen , 2014, Behavioural Processes.

[20]  L. Keeling.  Inter-bird distances and behavioural priorities in laying hens: the effect of spatial restriction , 1994 .

[21]  Marian Stamp Dawkins,et al.  Prediction of feather damage in laying hens using optical flows and Markov models , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[22]  J. Bergquist,et al.  Domestication effects on behavioural and hormonal responses to acute stress in chickens , 2014, Physiology & Behavior.

[23]  R. Montgomery,et al.  Moving GIS Research Indoors: Spatiotemporal Analysis of Agricultural Animals , 2014, PloS one.

[24]  Tyler B. Muhly,et al.  Effects of Wolves on Elk and Cattle Behaviors: Implications for Livestock Production and Wolf Conservation , 2010, PloS one.

[25]  P. N. Grigor,et al.  Low incidence of aggression in large flocks of laying hens , 1997 .

[26]  H.W. Cheng,et al.  Different behavioral and physiological responses in two genetic lines of laying hens after transportation. , 2008, Poultry science.