Enhancing Peer Interaction and Learning in the Classroom Through Reciprocal Questioning

A guided reciprocal peer-questioning procedure was used by college students for learning expository material presented in classroom lectures. Students worked individually, using investigator-provided generic questions to guide them in generating their own task-specific questions. Following this self-questioning phase, they worked in small cooperative groups, taking turns posing their questions to each other and answering each other’s questions. This procedure was designed to promote the kind of verbal interaction that has been found to benefit learning in small groups, namely, giving elaborated explanations. Results indicated that students using this guided reciprocal peer-questioning procedure asked more critical thinking (vs. recall) questions, gave more explanations (vs. low-level elaboration responses), and demonstrated higher achievement than students using a discussion approach (Experiment 1) or those using an unguided reciprocal peer-questioning approach (Experiment 2). Guided reciprocal peer-questioning appears to promote peer interaction and learning in cooperative groups by controlling the quality of questioning, which in turn shapes peer responses.

[1]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[2]  E. I. Sawin.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1. Committee of College and University Examiners, Benjamin S. Bloom , 1957 .

[3]  Frank L. Ryan,et al.  Exemplars for the new social studies;: Instructing in the elementary school , 1971 .

[4]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[5]  W. Doise,et al.  Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances , 1978 .

[6]  Gabriel Mugny,et al.  Individual and collective conflicts of centrations in cognitive development , 1979 .

[7]  Yaacov Schul,et al.  On the Cognitive Benefits of Teaching , 1980 .

[8]  John W. Thomas.  Agency and Achievement: Self-management and Self-regard , 1980 .

[9]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Psychology of How Novices Learn Computer Programming , 1981, CSUR.

[10]  N. Webb.  Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups. , 1982 .

[11]  Paul Light,et al.  Social Cognition: Studies of the Development of Understanding , 1982 .

[12]  N. Webb.  Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups , 1982 .

[13]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  The Relationship of Student Ability and Small-Group Interaction to Student Achievement , 1982 .

[14]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-monitoring activities , 1983 .

[15]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Microcomputer Learning in Small Groups: Cognitive Requirements and Group Processes. , 1984 .

[16]  F. C. Serafica.  Social-Cognitive Development in Context , 1984 .

[17]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  The Social Context of Instruction. Group Organization and Group Processes. [Papers Presented at a Conference Held at The Wisconsin Center for Education Research (Madison, May 1982).]. , 1987 .

[18]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[19]  Scott Lewis,et al.  Problem-Solving Strategies and Group Processes in Small Groups Learning Computer Programming , 1986 .

[20]  Stephen L. Benton,et al.  The relationship between information-processing ability and notetaking , 1988 .

[21]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Elaborative Interrogation Facilitates Acquisition of Confusing Facts. , 1988 .

[22]  N. Webb.  Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[23]  A. King.  Verbal Interaction and Problem-Solving within Computer-Assisted Cooperative Learning Groups , 1989 .

[24]  A. King.  Effects of self-questioning training on college students' comprehension of lectures , 1989 .

[25]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarowitz,et al.  Cooperation and helping in the classroom: A contextual approach , 1989 .

[26]  A. King.  Improving lecture comprehension: Effects of a metacognitive strategy , 1991 .