Entropy of the Multi-Channel EEG Recordings Identifies the Distributed Signatures of Negative, Neutral and Positive Affect in Whole-Brain Variability

Individuals’ ability to express their subjective experiences in terms of such attributes as pleasant/unpleasant or positive/negative feelings forms a fundamental property of their affect and emotion. However, neuroscientific findings on the underlying neural substrates of the affect appear to be inconclusive with some reporting the presence of distinct and independent brain systems and others identifying flexible and distributed brain regions. A common theme among these studies is the focus on the change in brain activation. As a result, they do not take into account the findings that indicate the brain activation and its information content does not necessarily modulate and that the stimuli with equivalent sensory and behavioural processing demands may not necessarily result in differential brain activation. In this article, we take a different stance on the analysis of the differential effect of the negative, neutral and positive affect on the brain functioning in which we look into the whole-brain variability: that is the change in the brain information processing measured in multiple distributed regions. For this purpose, we compute the entropy of individuals’ muti-channel EEG recordings who watched movie clips with differing affect. Our results suggest that the whole-brain variability significantly differentiates between the negative, neutral and positive affect. They also indicate that although some brain regions contribute more to such differences, it is the whole-brain variational pattern that results in their significantly above chance level prediction. These results imply that although the underlying brain substrates for negative, neutral and positive affect exhibit quantitatively differing degrees of variability, their differences are rather subtly encoded in the whole-brain variational patterns that are distributed across its entire activity.

[1]  C. L. M.,et al.  Outlines of Psychology , 1891, Nature.

[2]  C. Osgood The nature and measurement of meaning. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[4]  L. Pinneo On noise in the nervous system. , 1966, Psychological review.

[5]  S. Laughlin A Simple Coding Procedure Enhances a Neuron's Information Capacity , 1981, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[6]  H. Eysenck,et al.  A revised version of the Psychoticism scale. , 1985 .

[7]  D. Watson,et al.  Toward a consensual structure of mood. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Jonathan D. Cryer,et al.  Time Series Analysis , 1986 .

[9]  Tang,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/f Noise , 2011 .

[10]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[11]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations , 1992 .

[12]  P. Phillips,et al.  Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? , 1992 .

[13]  R. Larsen,et al.  Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. , 1992 .

[14]  P. Philippot Inducing and assessing differentiated emotion-feeling states in the laboratory. , 1993, Cognition & emotion.

[15]  M. Lewis The emergence of human emotions. , 1993 .

[16]  William Bialek,et al.  Entropy and Information in Neural Spike Trains , 1996, cond-mat/9603127.

[17]  L. Györfi,et al.  Nonparametric entropy estimation. An overview , 1997 .

[18]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Time-Related Changes in Neural Systems Underlying Attention and Arousal During the Performance of an Auditory Vigilance Task , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  D. P. Russell,et al.  Functional Clustering: Identifying Strongly Interactive Brain Regions in Neuroimaging Data , 1998, NeuroImage.

[20]  J. Russell,et al.  Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. , 1998 .

[21]  J. Russell,et al.  A Role for the Human Amygdala in Recognizing Emotional Arousal From Unpleasant Stimuli , 1999 .

[22]  K. Hadri Testing The Null Hypothesis Of Stationarity Against The Alternative Of A Unit Root In Panel Data With Serially Correlated Errors , 1999 .

[23]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Information theory and neural coding , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  James M. Carroll,et al.  On the Psychometric Principles of Affect , 1999 .

[25]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. , 1999 .

[26]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[27]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[28]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Meta-analysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. , 2001, Emotion.

[31]  David D. Cox,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[32]  K. Luan Phan,et al.  Valence, gender, and lateralization of functional brain anatomy in emotion: a meta-analysis of findings from neuroimaging , 2003, NeuroImage.

[33]  A. Lawrence,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of emotions: A meta-analysis , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[34]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Neural correlates of categories and concepts , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[35]  A. P. R Smith,et al.  fMRI correlates of the episodic retrieval of emotional contexts , 2004, NeuroImage.

[36]  R. Mar The neuropsychology of narrative: story comprehension, story production and their interrelation , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  E. Rolls,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology , 2004, Progress in Neurobiology.

[38]  S. Corkin,et al.  Two routes to emotional memory: distinct neural processes for valence and arousal. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Learning to Decode Cognitive States from Brain Images , 2004, Machine Learning.

[40]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Neuronal variability: noise or part of the signal? , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  N‐back working memory paradigm: A meta‐analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[42]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Segregated neural representation of distinct emotion dimensions in the prefrontal cortex—an fMRI study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[43]  R. Passingham,et al.  Reading Hidden Intentions in the Human Brain , 2007, Current Biology.

[44]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  The perception of facial expressions in newborns , 2007, The European journal of developmental psychology.

[45]  John M Beggs,et al.  The criticality hypothesis: how local cortical networks might optimize information processing , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[46]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural correlates of processing valence and arousal in affective words. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  A. Faisal,et al.  Noise in the nervous system , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[48]  D. Heeger,et al.  A Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows in Human Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  M. Sams,et al.  Inter-Subject Synchronization of Prefrontal Cortex Hemodynamic Activity During Natural Viewing , 2008, The open neuroimaging journal.

[50]  Tom Michael Mitchell,et al.  Predicting Human Brain Activity Associated with the Meanings of Nouns , 2008, Science.

[51]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  Functional grouping and cortical–subcortical interactions in emotion: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies , 2008, NeuroImage.

[52]  R. Quiroga,et al.  Extracting information from neuronal populations: information theory and decoding approaches , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[53]  J. Russell,et al.  The neurophysiological bases of emotion: An fMRI study of the affective circumplex using emotion‐denoting words , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[54]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Affect as a Psychological Primitive. , 2009, Advances in experimental social psychology.

[55]  Karl J. Friston The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[56]  Catherine J. Norris,et al.  The current status of research on the structure of evaluative space , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[57]  Stefano Fusi,et al.  Emotion, cognition, and mental state representation in amygdala and prefrontal cortex. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[58]  S. Hamann,et al.  Neuroimaging Support for Discrete Neural Correlates of Basic Emotions: A Voxel-based Meta-analysis , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  C. Grady,et al.  The Importance of Being Variable , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  C. Honey,et al.  Topographic Mapping of a Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows Using a Narrated Story , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  Woodrow L. Shew,et al.  Information Capacity and Transmission Are Maximized in Balanced Cortical Networks with Neuronal Avalanches , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[62]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Relating brain signal variability to knowledge representation , 2012, NeuroImage.

[63]  Jing Wang,et al.  Decoding the neural representation of affective states , 2012, NeuroImage.

[64]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Review Moment-to-moment Brain Signal Variability: a next Frontier in Human Brain Mapping? , 2022 .

[65]  Woodrow L. Shew,et al.  The Functional Benefits of Criticality in the Cortex , 2013, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[66]  Bao-Liang Lu,et al.  Differential entropy feature for EEG-based emotion classification , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[67]  Claudia M. Roebers,et al.  Cortical oxygen consumption in mental arithmetic as a function of task difficulty: a near-infrared spectroscopy approach , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[68]  Y Kamitani,et al.  Neural Decoding of Visual Imagery During Sleep , 2013, Science.

[69]  A. Damasio,et al.  The nature of feelings: evolutionary and neurobiological origins , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[70]  Maciej Tomczak,et al.  The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size , 2014 .

[71]  K. Hiraki,et al.  Negative emotion modulates prefrontal cortex activity during a working memory task: a NIRS study , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[72]  A. Burgess,et al.  Hypnotic induction is followed by state-like changes in the organization of EEG functional connectivity in the theta and beta frequency bands in high-hypnotically susceptible individuals , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[73]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[74]  Sreekanth H. Chalasani,et al.  Information theory of adaptation in neurons, behavior, and mood , 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[75]  A. Ehlis,et al.  Replication of the correlation between natural mood states and working memory-related prefrontal activity measured by near-infrared spectroscopy in a German sample , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[76]  Bao-Liang Lu,et al.  Investigating Critical Frequency Bands and Channels for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition with Deep Neural Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[77]  A. Seth,et al.  Granger Causality Analysis in Neuroscience and Neuroimaging , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[78]  Woodrow L. Shew,et al.  Cascades and Cognitive State: Focused Attention Incurs Subcritical Dynamics , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[79]  Yifei Lu,et al.  Combining Eye Movements and EEG to Enhance Emotion Recognition , 2015, IJCAI.

[80]  C. Koch,et al.  Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[81]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Confidence and certainty: distinct probabilistic quantities for different goals , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[82]  Ajay B. Satpute,et al.  The Brain Basis of Positive and Negative Affect: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis of the Human Neuroimaging Literature. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[83]  R. Hari,et al.  Discrete Neural Signatures of Basic Emotions. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[84]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Emotional state estimation using a modified gradient-based neural architecture with weighted estimates , 2017, 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[85]  Yuan Chang Leong,et al.  How We Transmit Memories to Other Brains: Constructing Shared Neural Representations Via Communication , 2016, bioRxiv.

[86]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Communication dynamics in complex brain networks , 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[87]  Satu Palva,et al.  Roles of Brain Criticality and Multiscale Oscillations in Temporal Predictions for Sensorimotor Processing , 2018, Trends in Neurosciences.

[88]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  The grand challenges of Science Robotics , 2018, Science Robotics.

[89]  Earl K. Miller,et al.  Different Levels of Category Abstraction by Different Dynamics in Different Prefrontal Areas , 2018, Neuron.

[90]  R. Carhart-Harris The entropic brain - revisited , 2018, Neuropharmacology.

[91]  Justus M. Kebschull,et al.  The logic of single-cell projections from visual cortex , 2018, Nature.

[92]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Cortical travelling waves: mechanisms and computational principles , 2018, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[93]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Human consciousness is supported by dynamic complex patterns of brain signal coordination , 2019, Science Advances.

[94]  Ralf Wessel,et al.  Cortical Circuit Dynamics Are Homeostatically Tuned to Criticality In Vivo , 2019, Neuron.

[95]  M. Spüler Questioning the evidence for BCI-based communication in the complete locked-in state , 2019, PLoS biology.

[96]  Tor D Wager,et al.  Emotion schemas are embedded in the human visual system , 2019, Science Advances.