Focal hepatic masses: enhancement patterns with SH U 508A and pulse-inversion US.

PURPOSE To evaluate the role of SH U 508A-enhanced ultrasonography (US) in the differentiation of focal hepatic masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS Contrast material-enhanced pulse inversion US was performed on 58 unknown hepatic lesions: 23 hepatocellular carcinomas, 10 focal nodular hyperplasias, 16 hemangiomas, and nine metastases. Selected images were sequentially reviewed by readers blinded to the final diagnosis. On a baseline image, they determined lesion echogenicity, and on a vascular image, the presence or absence of distinct vascularity. On an arterial phase interval-delay flash image and a postvascular image, they assessed enhancement of the lesion and liver. Responses were compared with confirmed diagnoses. RESULTS Focal nodular hyperplasia was characterized by detectable vascularity and positive enhancement on interval-delay and postvascular scans (sensitivity, 83% [eight of 10 lesions]; specificity, 98% [40 of 41 lesions]). Hepatocellular carcinoma also showed detectable vascularity and positive enhancement on interval-delay images but no postvascular enhancement (sensitivity, 68% [14 of 20 lesions]; specificity, 74% [23 of 31 lesions]). Vascular imaging with SH U 508A did not contribute to the diagnosis of metastasis or hemangioma. However, no or weak enhancement during the arterial phase flash without postvascular enhancement produced a sensitivity of 83% (seven of eight lesions) and sensitivity of 77% (33 of 43 lesions) for metastasis. Peripheral nodular enhancement on arterial phase flash images was highly specific (98% [37 of 38 lesions]) but not sensitive (44% [six of 13 lesions]) for hemangioma. CONCLUSION SH U 508A-enhanced pulse-inversion interval-delay flash and postvascular phase imaging are helpful in differential diagnosis of focal hepatic lesions.

[1]  D O Cosgrove,et al.  Improved imaging of liver metastases with stimulated acoustic emission in the late phase of enhancement with the US contrast agent SH U 508A: early experience. , 1999, Radiology.

[2]  M. Averkiou,et al.  Techniques for perfusion imaging with microbubble contrast agents , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Navin C. Nanda,et al.  Advances in Echo Imaging Using Contrast Enhancement , 1997, Springer Netherlands.

[4]  Andrea Prosperetti,et al.  Thermal effects and damping mechanisms in the forced radial oscillations of gas bubbles in liquids , 1977 .

[5]  P. Burns,et al.  Pulse inversion imaging of liver blood flow: improved method for characterizing focal masses with microbubble contrast. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[6]  S. Ohshima,et al.  A microwave exciter for Cs frequency standards based on a sapphire loaded cavity oscillator , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (Cat. No.98CH36165).

[7]  M. Fujita,et al.  Color Doppler flow imaging of liver tumors. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  H. Mischinger,et al.  Sonographic evaluation of focal nodular hyperplasias (FNH) of the liver with a transpulmonary galactose-based contrast agent (Levovist). , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  P. Burns,et al.  Harmonic hepatic US with microbubble contrast agent: initial experience showing improved characterization of hemangioma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metastasis. , 2000, Radiology.

[10]  P. Burns,et al.  Nonlinear imaging. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  B. Choi,et al.  Hepatic tumors: contrast agent-enhancement patterns with pulse-inversion harmonic US. , 2000, Radiology.

[12]  Harald Becher,et al.  Handbook of Contrast Echocardiography , 2000, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[13]  N. Hosten,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced power Doppler sonography: Improved detection of characteristic flow patterns in focal liver lesions , 1999, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[14]  R. Farina,et al.  [Hepatic focal lesions: role of color Doppler ultrasonography with contrast media]. , 1998, La Radiologia medica.