Tagging Items Automatically Based on Both Content Information and Browsing Behaviors

Tags have been adopted by many online services as a method to manage their online resources. Effective tagging benefits both users and firms. In real applications providing a user tagging mechanism, only a small portion of tags are usually provided by users. Therefore, an automatic tagging method, which can assign tags to different items automatically, is urgently needed. Previous works on automatic tagging focus on exploring the tagging behavior of users or the content information of items. In online service platforms, users frequently browse items related to their interests, which implies users’ judgment about the underlying features of items and is helpful for automatic tagging. Browsing-behavior records are much more plentiful compared with tagging behavior and easy to collect. However, existing studies about automatic tagging ignore this kind of information. To properly integrate both browsing behaviors and content information for automatic tagging, we propose a novel probabilistic graphical model and develop a new algorithm for the model parameter inference. We conduct thorough experiments on a real-world data set to evaluate and analyze the performance of our proposed method. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach achieves better performance than state-of-the-art automatic tagging methods. Summary of Contribution. In this paper, we study how to automatically assign tags to items in an e-commerce background. Our study is about how to perform item tagging for e-commerce and other online service providers so that consumers can easily find what they need and firms can manage their resources effectively. Specifically, we study if consumer browsing behavior can be utilized to perform the tagging task automatically, which can save efforts of both firms and consumers. Additionally, we transform the problem into how to find the most proper tags for items and propose a novel probabilistic graphical model to model the generation process of tags. Finally, we develop a variational inference algorithm to learn the model parameters, and the model shows superior performance over competing benchmark models. We believe this study contributes to machine learning techniques.

[1]  Bala Iyer,et al.  Innovation Impacts of Using Social Bookmarking Systems , 2011, MIS Q..

[2]  Yi-Cheng Zhang,et al.  Tag-Aware Recommender Systems: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 2011, Journal of Computer Science and Technology.

[3]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media , 2007, CHI.

[4]  J. Lafferty,et al.  Mixed-membership models of scientific publications , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Hong Cheng,et al.  The dual-sparse topic model: mining focused topics and focused terms in short text , 2014, WWW.

[6]  Yang Song,et al.  Automatic tag recommendation algorithms for social recommender systems , 2011, ACM Trans. Web.

[7]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  Value Transformation in the Mobile Service Ecosystem: A Study of App Store Emergence and Growth , 2012 .

[8]  Zhoujun Li,et al.  The topic-perspective model for social tagging systems , 2010, KDD.

[9]  Thomas Lukasiewicz,et al.  Tag-Aware Personalized Recommendation Using a Deep-Semantic Similarity Model with Negative Sampling , 2016, CIKM.

[10]  Lars Schmidt-Thieme,et al.  Tag-aware recommender systems by fusion of collaborative filtering algorithms , 2008, SAC '08.

[11]  Panagiotis Symeonidis,et al.  Tag recommendations based on tensor dimensionality reduction , 2008, RecSys '08.

[12]  Hongyan Liu,et al.  Exploiting User Consuming Behavior for Effective Item Tagging , 2017, CIKM.

[13]  Roland Helm,et al.  Optimal stimulation level theory, exploratory consumer behaviour and product adoption: an analysis of underlying structures across product categories , 2009 .

[14]  David M. Blei,et al.  Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticians , 2016, ArXiv.

[15]  Feng Xu,et al.  Guiding supervised topic modeling for content based tag recommendation , 2018, Neurocomputing.

[16]  Lars Schmidt-Thieme,et al.  Pairwise interaction tensor factorization for personalized tag recommendation , 2010, WSDM '10.

[17]  P. S. Raju Optimum Stimulation Level: Its Relationship to Personality, Demographics, and Exploratory Behavior , 1980 .

[18]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  The Role of Optimum Stimulation Level in Exploratory Consumer Behavior , 1992 .

[19]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Designing for Diagnosticity and Serendipity: An Investigation of Social Product-Search Mechanisms , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  Harvesting Brand Information from Social Tags , 2017 .

[21]  Feng Xu,et al.  MATAR: Keywords Enhanced Multi-label Learning for Tag Recommendation , 2015, APWeb.

[22]  Zhiyuan Liu,et al.  FolkDiffusion: A Graph-Based Tag Suggestion Method for Folksonomies , 2010, AIRS.

[23]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Exploratory consumer buying behavior: conceptualization and measurement. , 1996 .

[24]  Ramesh Nallapati,et al.  Labeled LDA: A supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-labeled corpora , 2009, EMNLP.

[25]  Hongyan Liu,et al.  Mining Exploratory Behavior to Improve Mobile App Recommendations , 2017, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Manik Varma,et al.  FastXML: a fast, accurate and stable tree-classifier for extreme multi-label learning , 2014, KDD.

[27]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Modeling annotated data , 2003, SIGIR.