The quick and the dead: when reaction beats intention

Everyday behaviour involves a trade-off between planned actions and reaction to environmental events. Evidence from neurophysiology, neurology and functional brain imaging suggests different neural bases for the control of different movement types. Here we develop a behavioural paradigm to test movement dynamics for intentional versus reaction movements and provide evidence for a ‘reactive advantage’ in movement execution, whereby the same action is executed faster in reaction to an opponent. We placed pairs of participants in competition with each other to make a series of button presses. Within-subject analysis of movement times revealed a 10 per cent benefit for reactive actions. This was maintained when opponents performed dissimilar actions, and when participants competed against a computer, suggesting that the effect is not related to facilitation produced by action observation. Rather, faster ballistic movements may be a general property of reactive motor control, potentially providing a useful means of promoting survival.

[1]  R. Miall,et al.  Movement interference in autism-spectrum disorder , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Sukhvinder S. Obhi,et al.  Internally generated and externally triggered actions are physically distinct and independently controlled , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  R. Passingham,et al.  Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. II. The effect of movement predictability on regional cerebral blood flow. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  Gaby Maimon,et al.  Parietal Area 5 and the Initiation of Self-Timed Movements versus Simple Reactions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[6]  D A Rosenbaum,et al.  Scheduling and programming of rapid finger sequences: tests and elaborations of the hierarchical editor model. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  J. Tanji,et al.  Contrasting neuronal activity in supplementary and precentral motor cortex of monkeys. II. Responses to movement triggering vs. nontriggering sensory signals. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others with One's Own Mirror Neuron System , 2005, PLoS biology.

[10]  J. Flanagan,et al.  The reaching movements of patients with Parkinson's disease under self-determined maximal speed and visually cued conditions. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  U. Castiello,et al.  Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour , 2007, Cognition.

[13]  E. Jones.  Ascending inputs to, and internal organization of, cortical motor areas. , 1987, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[14]  Robert Chen,et al.  Changing the "when" and "what" of intended actions. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  L. Deecke,et al.  The Preparation and Execution of Self-Initiated and Externally-Triggered Movement: A Study of Event-Related fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[16]  P. Roland,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow changes in cortex and basal ganglia during voluntary movements in normal human volunteers. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  J. Talairach,et al.  Clinical consequences of corticectomies involving the supplementary motor area in man , 1977, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[18]  M. Inase,et al.  Neuronal activity in the primate premotor, supplementary, and precentral motor cortex during visually guided and internally determined sequential movements. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[21]  S. Ortiz,et al.  The American West , 2005 .

[22]  D Goodman,et al.  On the nature of human interlimb coordination. , 1979, Science.

[23]  K. A. Hadland,et al.  Role of the human medial frontal cortex in task switching: a combined fMRI and TMS study. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  W. Schultz,et al.  Neuronal activity preceding self-initiated or externally timed arm movements in area 6 of monkey cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Ewald Moser,et al.  The selection of intended actions and the observation of others' actions: A time-resolved fMRI study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[26]  James Stanley,et al.  Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Sam J. Gilbert,et al.  Modification of planned actions , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  R. Ratcliff.  Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  E Brenner,et al.  Perception and action are based on the same visual information: distinction between position and velocity. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  J. Tanji,et al.  The role of premotor cortex and the supplementary motor area in the temporal control of movement in man. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  M. Hallett,et al.  Mesial motor areas in self-initiated versus externally triggered movements examined with fMRI: effect of movement type and rate. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Switching from automatic to controlled action by monkey medial frontal cortex , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. , 1988, Psychological review.

[34]  C. Kennard,et al.  Human Medial Frontal Cortex Mediates Unconscious Inhibition of Voluntary Action , 2007, Neuron.

[35]  R. Iansek,et al.  Movement-related potentials in Parkinson's disease. Presence and predictability of temporal and spatial cues. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  G. Hammond,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory processes in primary motor cortex during the foreperiod of a warned reaction time task are unrelated to response expectancy , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.